yes he didBeat me to it.
I can only tell you about past ones. My team is non invited to future ones due to other people’s interpretation of what our views are.Is this what it's like at an Anarchist bookfair?
are you this much of a prig off the boards?
i have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with meI suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
yesis this some sort of alternate reality urban or something? who are all these strange people?
anything interesting going on, or is it just the usual?
is this some sort of alternate reality urban or something? who are all these strange people?
anything interesting going on, or is it just the usual?
is this some sort of alternate reality urban or something? who are all these strange people?
anything interesting going on, or is it just the usual?
i have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with me
i haven't used the words "unsolicited" or "unwelcome" in any exchange with you and it's a lie for you to suggest i have.I know this is going to sound like a crazy idea, but bear with me for a moment: Have you tried not referencing their arguments with other people in your dealings with them? Anyway your trolling is pretty subpar to be honest.
Well discuss it with Fozzie Bear who said it was multi-factor, at least one of the factors being adherence to some particularized social norm.
I can only tell you about past ones. My team is non invited to future ones due to other people’s interpretation of what our views are.
I’m a member of ACG, who are, apparently, “terfs who support Helen Steel”. This Judgement is non negotiable and actual statements or positions are irrelevant.What the hell did you get disinvited for?
do you see how you have one rule for yourself and quite another for everyone else?
#2"Unwelcome" and "unsolicited" leap out at me from that.
#3I did not solicit your advice on social norms and clearly showed it to be unwelcome when offered anyway, I don't see the problem with my statement.
#4are you this much of a prig off the boards?
#5I suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
i have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with me
i haven't referred to chilango's argument with you.You claim (#5) to have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with you. The reference to said argument between myself and chilango (#1 and #2) was introduced in your dealings with me by #3. It hence seems to stand to reason that, if you have no patience for such arguments to be referenced in your dealings with people you could, you know, not reference them. As for having one rule for myself and another for everyone else, you are free to substantiate that claim. If that remark is about my claim that your trolling is subpar, it's because your complaint in #5 is only one "link" backwards to #3 which should've showed you the obvious solution to the problem you expressed having in #5. If you want to troll properly you have to have many links backwards so people have forgotten by then who it was who brought up what.
I’m a member of ACG, who are, apparently, “terfs who support Helen Steel”. This Judgement is non negotiable and actual statements or positions are irrelevant.
i thought you agreed with the statement Serge Forward posted upthread, which doesn't seem of a piece with this 'terfs who support helen steel' for meI’m a member of ACG, who are, apparently, “terfs who support Helen Steel”. This Judgement is non negotiable and actual statements or positions are irrelevant.
i haven't used the words "unsolicited" or "unwelcome" in any exchange with you and it's a lie for you to suggest i have.
when you reply to someone like thisHave you completely lost the plot here? I never claimed you used the words "unsolicited" or "unwelcome" in any exchange with me.
you give rather another impression with your use of quote marksI suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
It’s not reality. Reality is irrelevant.That has not been my experience of ACG.
when you reply to someone like this
you give rather another impression with your use of quote marks
referring me back to the drivel i dealt with in my 1428 - a post you've ignoredOnly to the stupid and the disingenuous, for details I'm happy to refer you back a couple of posts.
I’m a member of ACG, who are, apparently, “terfs who support Helen Steel”. This Judgement is non negotiable and actual statements or positions are irrelevant.
I do. And you’re right, it isn’t. But that’s not the perception that seems to be doing the rounds.i thought you agreed with the statement Serge Forward posted upthread, which doesn't seem of a piece with this 'terfs who support helen steel' for me
referring me back to the drivel i dealt with in my 1428 - a post you've understandably ignored
no surprise there
I think there are several layers of discussion going on. As usual with this debate. For the avoidance of doubt, I count Fozzie Bear and chilango as decent folks and comrades.And you're not even being a dick to the bookfair authorities. See, I knew that whole "don't be a dickhead" thing was just an excuse.