Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

London Anarchist bookfair 2020

are you this much of a prig off the boards?

I suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
 
I suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
i have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with me
 
is this some sort of alternate reality urban or something? who are all these strange people?

anything interesting going on, or is it just the usual?

Did you mean alternative there, or one which keeps switching in and out of reality? Either would do tbf.
 
i have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with me

I know this is going to sound like a crazy idea, but bear with me for a moment: Have you tried not referencing their arguments with other people in your dealings with them? Anyway your trolling is pretty subpar to be honest.
 
I know this is going to sound like a crazy idea, but bear with me for a moment: Have you tried not referencing their arguments with other people in your dealings with them? Anyway your trolling is pretty subpar to be honest.
i haven't used the words "unsolicited" or "unwelcome" in any exchange with you and it's a lie for you to suggest i have.

but do you see how you have one rule for yourself and quite another for everyone else?
Well discuss it with Fozzie Bear who said it was multi-factor, at least one of the factors being adherence to some particularized social norm.
 
Last edited:
do you see how you have one rule for yourself and quite another for everyone else?

#1
"Unwelcome" and "unsolicited" leap out at me from that.
#2
I did not solicit your advice on social norms and clearly showed it to be unwelcome when offered anyway, I don't see the problem with my statement.
#3
are you this much of a prig off the boards?
#4
I suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
#5
i have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with me

You claim (#5) to have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with you. The reference to said argument between myself and chilango (#1 and #2) was introduced in your dealings with me by #3. It hence seems to stand to reason that, if you have no patience for such arguments to be referenced in your dealings with people you could, you know, not reference them. As for having one rule for myself and another for everyone else, you are free to substantiate that claim. If that remark is about my claim that your trolling is subpar, it's because your complaint in #5 is only one "link" backwards to #3 which should've showed you the obvious solution to the problem you expressed having in #5. If you want to troll properly you have to have many links backwards so people have forgotten by then who it was who brought up what.
 
You claim (#5) to have no patience with people who continually reference their arguments with other people in their dealings with you. The reference to said argument between myself and chilango (#1 and #2) was introduced in your dealings with me by #3. It hence seems to stand to reason that, if you have no patience for such arguments to be referenced in your dealings with people you could, you know, not reference them. As for having one rule for myself and another for everyone else, you are free to substantiate that claim. If that remark is about my claim that your trolling is subpar, it's because your complaint in #5 is only one "link" backwards to #3 which should've showed you the obvious solution to the problem you expressed having in #5. If you want to troll properly you have to have many links backwards so people have forgotten by then who it was who brought up what.
i haven't referred to chilango's argument with you.

i quoted your post, which is brimful of priggery, as an example of priggery. if i'd wanted to reference chilango's argument, i would have quoted chilango. it stands to reason, doesn't it. so, so much of your post is useless verbiage based on premises founded on sand.
 
Have you completely lost the plot here? I never claimed you used the words "unsolicited" or "unwelcome" in any exchange with me.
when you reply to someone like this
I suppose. I guess I mostly just have no patience for silly games like complaining about "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" advice on relationships whilst giving me unsolicited and unwelcome advice on relationships and then complaining that the words "unsolicited" and "unwelcome" are used in pointing that out.
you give rather another impression with your use of quote marks
 
I’m a member of ACG, who are, apparently, “terfs who support Helen Steel”. This Judgement is non negotiable and actual statements or positions are irrelevant.

And you're not even being a dick to the bookfair authorities. See, I knew that whole "don't be a dickhead" thing was just an excuse.
 
I thought I’d repost a link to the ACG statement, to which I subscribe:

 
Back
Top Bottom