Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

London Anarchist bookfair 2020

what trans rights organisations actually demand that 'trans women should have access to all women's spaces, in all circumstances, without any exceptions?'
Stonewall submitted a statement to the Women and Equalities Select Committee on Transgender Equality calling for a review of the Equality Act 2010, including "remov[ing] exemptions, such as access to single-sex spaces".
 
Stonewall submitted a statement to the Women and Equalities Select Committee on Transgender Equality calling for a review of the Equality Act 2010, including "remov[ing] exemptions, such as access to single-sex spaces".
as indeed noted earlier and responded to at length. That does not equate to 'in all circumstances, without any exceptions'
 
Under your system, if, when speaking to people, they lie about/don't reveal their biological sex, you can't effectively provide single-sex spaces, even in the most essential cases. Can you see why that's something that bothers some women?
I would do this crazy thing of trusting trained, committed and experienced workers to recognise when someone is not acting in a manner conducive to the good of the group. We don't need strict laws and regulations to map out every possibility. Everyone should, and can, be found a way to be given support. It's an insult to the workers (women in the overwhelming majority) who provide such services to say that they are incapable of making such judgement calls. They already do it most days.

On a thread about an Anarchist Bookfair, to be demanding ever more stringent and codified rules seems a bit bizarre. So I'll leave it there.
 
I would do this crazy thing of trusting trained, committed and experienced workers to recognise when someone is not acting in a manner conducive to the good of the group. We don't need strict laws and regulations to map out every possibility.

Admission to single-sex spaces is contingent on sex, not just how someone is acting! If you belive in effective single-sex spaces (do you, by the way?), it follows that you need an efffective way to establish sex. Where someone is refusing to disclose their sex, or even lying about it, are you saying that those responsible for those spaces can and should establish sex entirely on looks? If not, how do you propse they do it?
 
Last edited:
Admission to single-sex spaces is contingent on sex, not how someone is acting! If you belive in effective single-sex spaces (do you, by the way?), it follows that you need an efffective way to establish sex. Where someone is refusing to disclose their sex, or even lying about it, are you saying that those responsible for those spaces can and should establish sex entirely on looks? If not, how do you propse they do it?
admission to ALL non-public spaces is contingent on how you are acting. Every single one. No woman, cis or trans, can just rock up to a refuge and demand entry. You are talking utter nonsense. Probably on purpose. But, as I said, I'm done on this topic on this thread as everyone else has more pressing concerns about the event.
 
admission to ALL non-public spaces is contingent on how you are acting. Every single one. No woman, cis or trans, can just rock up to a refuge and demand entry. You are talking utter nonsense. Probably on purpose. But, as I said, I'm done on this topic on this thread as everyone else has more pressing concerns about the event.
i hear that admission to a prison generally not on a voluntary basis either
 
admission to ALL non-public spaces is contingent on how you are acting. Every single one. No woman, cis or trans, can just rock up to a refuge and demand entry. You are talking utter nonsense. Probably on purpose. But, as I said, I'm done on this topic on this thread as everyone else has more pressing concerns about the event.

Pure sophistry.

I find it hard to believe you didn't understand what I meant, but have added the word 'just' to the original post, to be certain.

To be clear: Conduct is a necessary condition for entry, but not a sufficient one. Of course a woman who was acting dangerously wouldn't be admitted, but, also, a man who was acting entirely reasonably wouldn't be admitted.

You can't seriously be suggesting that sex isn't a condition of entry to single sex-spaces. Can you?

That sex is a condition of entry to single-sex spaces means that, if you believe in effective single-sex spaces (do you, by the way?), you need an effective way to establish sex. How should that be done (in addition to, rather than instead of, assessing e.g. how someone is acting)? Visually? Checking paperwork?

Please don't duck this.
 
Last edited:
When there always seemed to be a fight.


... and people say we're not trying to live up the traditions of the Anarchist bookfair ;p

I mean the thread only covers one point of contention. Anarchists are a passionate and somewhat over zealous bunch, whatever generation or school you hereld from.
It's part of the reason I love the movement and greatly enjoy the comrades in it, even the ones I'm having a bluey with.
 
When there always seemed to be a fight.

At one point that was always with police
... and people say we're not trying to live up the traditions of the Anarchist bookfair ;p

I mean the thread only covers one point of contention. Anarchists are a passionate and somewhat over zealous bunch, whatever generation or school you hereld from.
It's part of the reason I love the movement and greatly enjoy the comrades in it, even the ones I'm having a bluey with.

The fight traditionally used to be with the police rather than each other.
 
At one point that was always with police


The fight traditionally used to be with the police rather than each other.


While we'd rather the police get their noses out of it, in my experience nothing unifies comrades like remembering who our shared enemy is.

Perhaps by the end of the Corvid 19 crisis we'll all be on better terms and understanding and we'll manage to hold an event with the mutual aid and solidarity of y'all.

We are certainly not the reactionary liberal authoritarians some would paint us, this I can promise ;)

Hope y'all stay safe these next few weeks! Especially those of you in the big smoke.
 
Now cancelled until 2021, as has the London Radical Bookfair in August
Sorry to hear this, though not unexpected. Was thinking of going, if i could get some mates to come along. Probably wouldn't have, but you never know..

been a while.

Last time i was in london at a political meet was class wars international conference sep -91. That was one of the defining moments of my 'political life', its importance to a young born'n'raised communist-gone-anarchist can't be overestimated. Fuelled some ten years of intense political activity and i got to see blaggers ita and chumbawumba live... (if anyone here was there i hope your alright, remember a brother and sister with a 'place of worship-like' surname, who put us up in hackney and a class war healthworker with a viking-name though i think he was from manchester..)
Rhyddical i wish you and yours all the best arranging lab 2021, and if it comes to mean half as much to some young lefties as cwic 91 meant to me and my mates, then you've done good.

see you at the barricades.
 
Thank you for the thoughts.

Bit of a heads up we are going to be hosting a Digital Anarchist Bookfair on October the 17th this year.
Both Stockholm and Montreal have done similar things and closer to home Afest have organised a similar effort.

We've spoken to several organisations already who seem quite keen and feel it's a good alternative given the situation. We'll be issuing a statement with our intentions and hope you all attend and find it useful.

We have been somewhat silent for a while due to the Mutual Aid activities and subsequently BLM needing to occupy our space and efforts however I would expect that we will be ramping up our media and campaign over the summer.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom