Why? Because of the name calling or because of the claim to universality?
It's a hilariously self contradictory mess of a sentence. Which manages to expose that to Rhydiccal only the people on the right side have the right to a "universal" opinion.
Why? Because of the name calling or because of the claim to universality?
Stonewall submitted a statement to the Women and Equalities Select Committee on Transgender Equality calling for a review of the Equality Act 2010, including "remov[ing] exemptions, such as access to single-sex spaces".what trans rights organisations actually demand that 'trans women should have access to all women's spaces, in all circumstances, without any exceptions?'
as indeed noted earlier and responded to at length. That does not equate to 'in all circumstances, without any exceptions'Stonewall submitted a statement to the Women and Equalities Select Committee on Transgender Equality calling for a review of the Equality Act 2010, including "remov[ing] exemptions, such as access to single-sex spaces".
I would do this crazy thing of trusting trained, committed and experienced workers to recognise when someone is not acting in a manner conducive to the good of the group. We don't need strict laws and regulations to map out every possibility. Everyone should, and can, be found a way to be given support. It's an insult to the workers (women in the overwhelming majority) who provide such services to say that they are incapable of making such judgement calls. They already do it most days.Under your system, if, when speaking to people, they lie about/don't reveal their biological sex, you can't effectively provide single-sex spaces, even in the most essential cases. Can you see why that's something that bothers some women?
I would do this crazy thing of trusting trained, committed and experienced workers to recognise when someone is not acting in a manner conducive to the good of the group. We don't need strict laws and regulations to map out every possibility.
admission to ALL non-public spaces is contingent on how you are acting. Every single one. No woman, cis or trans, can just rock up to a refuge and demand entry. You are talking utter nonsense. Probably on purpose. But, as I said, I'm done on this topic on this thread as everyone else has more pressing concerns about the event.Admission to single-sex spaces is contingent on sex, not how someone is acting! If you belive in effective single-sex spaces (do you, by the way?), it follows that you need an efffective way to establish sex. Where someone is refusing to disclose their sex, or even lying about it, are you saying that those responsible for those spaces can and should establish sex entirely on looks? If not, how do you propse they do it?
i hear that admission to a prison generally not on a voluntary basis eitheradmission to ALL non-public spaces is contingent on how you are acting. Every single one. No woman, cis or trans, can just rock up to a refuge and demand entry. You are talking utter nonsense. Probably on purpose. But, as I said, I'm done on this topic on this thread as everyone else has more pressing concerns about the event.
admission to ALL non-public spaces is contingent on how you are acting. Every single one. No woman, cis or trans, can just rock up to a refuge and demand entry. You are talking utter nonsense. Probably on purpose. But, as I said, I'm done on this topic on this thread as everyone else has more pressing concerns about the event.
Many of us will never before have had such opportunities for postingwhat’s good is that we will all have way more time to argue about who can access what spaces when we are on lockdown and the army is on the streets.
what’s good is that we will all have way more time to argue about who can access what spaces when we are on lockdown and the army is on the streets.
Many of us will never before have had such opportunities for posting
I'm stíll getting paid, so still posting on the boss's dime...but you won't be at work
I'm stíll getting paid, so still posting on the boss's dime
When there always seemed to be a fight.
When there always seemed to be a fight.
... and people say we're not trying to live up the traditions of the Anarchist bookfair ;p
I mean the thread only covers one point of contention. Anarchists are a passionate and somewhat over zealous bunch, whatever generation or school you hereld from.
It's part of the reason I love the movement and greatly enjoy the comrades in it, even the ones I'm having a bluey with.
Tbh far more often personal differences rather than ideological or with copsAt one point that was always with police
The fight traditionally used to be with the police rather than each other.
At one point that was always with police
The fight traditionally used to be with the police rather than each other.
Sorry to hear this, though not unexpected. Was thinking of going, if i could get some mates to come along. Probably wouldn't have, but you never know..Now cancelled until 2021, as has the London Radical Bookfair in August
Reckon it's fallen by the waysideis this happening? looked on the website and doesnt have any info
is this happening? looked on the website and doesnt have any info