sorry but there is no comparison between this and the Iraq situation - at least not the situation as it existed when we attacked Iraq (as opposed to the introduction of the no fly zone there)
In Libya a significant portion of the country has risen up to try to overthrow gadafi, is running a significant part of the country, is under military attack from Gadafi's forces, has been forced out of several areas they'd previously taken over, and have urgently been appealing for outside assistance to prevent Gadafi slaughtering them.
By this standard you should support the UN invasion of Somalia (also launched as humanitarian intervention) After all that ended so well didn't it.?n this situation the action is specifically authorised by a UN resolution, and is compliant with international law. In Iraq it wasn't.
I will have an ounce of respect for this hypocritical bollocks when i see you calling for western airstrikes in Israel, Yemen and Saudi Arabia
feel free to point us towards the UN resolution authorising the establishing of a no fly zone & the use of force to attack ground targets in Israel. I seem to have erased that resolution from my memory banks.Yes I can and do.
And with the UNSC resolutions, what about all the resolutions that the Israelis continue to ignore? Why have we not intervened on behalf of the Palestinians? What about the people of Bahrain? they too are demanding democracy and are being killed and brutalised as well as being invaded by not one but two foreign countries, Where do you stand on this issue? Do you support the UN intervening in Bahrain too
i dont think anyone here is particularly comfortable with the west bombing yet another country but im even less comfortable with what will happen if or when gadafi finally takes benghazi. the best thing to hope for i suppose is that blowing up most of his big weapons will make some saner people in the regime force gadafi out.
Indeed. I'm in the anti-Gaddafi, pro-people of Libya, anti-western Imperialism, pro-get it over as quickly as possible with the least bloodshed possible camp.
There are numerous resolutions declaring the occupation as illegal. Yet that doesn't stop the US vetoing every single resolution condemning Israeli settlement expansion. They did just this a few weeks ago.feel free to point us towards the UN resolution authorising the establishing of a no fly zone & the use of force to attack ground targets in Israel. I seem to have erased that resolution from my memory banks.
There are numerous resolutions declaring the occupation as illegal. Yet that doesn't stop the US vetoing every single resolution condemning Israeli settlement expansion. They did just this a few weeks ago.
feel free to point us towards the UN resolution authorising the establishing of a no fly zone & the use of force to attack ground targets in Israel. I seem to have erased that resolution from my memory banks.
as far as I'm aware, bahrain hasn't got any territory that has actually been taken out of the control of the government, no planes have been used, and air attacks on individual plane clothed policemen would seem a bit unlikely to do anything other than cause large numbers of civilian casualties.
There are numerous resolutions declaring the occupation as illegal. Yet that doesn't stop the US vetoing every single resolution condemning Israeli settlement expansion. They did just this a few weeks ago.
Any evolution of democracy in the Arab world can only, inevitably, result in the slow demise of the Israeli Empire.
That'll be the cruise missiles that are being tweeted about:
oh and just confirmed on R4
There are numerous resolutions declaring the occupation as illegal. Yet that doesn't stop the US vetoing every single resolution condemning Israeli settlement expansion. They did just this a few weeks ago.
When the West ie the Americans are getting to choose the governments, How is that democracy? And do you really believe that the Americans will allow any situation to develop that will threaten Israel?
I think that the times they are a-changing.
I was young when Dylan first sung it, but it could be happening now.
Of course there are reactionary forces and they will never be beaten. I think, however, that they are now suffering a serious defeat.
I hope that you are right but I doubt it.
No-one can be certain of anything. Ever.
I have never believed in living in hope, history is all that you have to look at to see the outcome, in this latest case I do just hope that the West is made to pay a heavy price for this latest crime.
I just hope there are not too many human shelds. I read earlier about Gaddafi forces taking the families of people possibly likely to defect into his barracks in Tripoli. Nasty.
I just hope there are not too many human shelds. I read earlier about Gaddafi forces taking the families of people possibly likely to defect into his barracks in Tripoli. Nasty.
I just hope there are not too many human shelds. I read earlier about Gaddafi forces taking the families of people possibly likely to defect into his barracks in Tripoli. Nasty.
I saw on the news thousands of his supporters surrounding his compound and offering themselves as human shields in the way the Serbs did so he has no need of hostages.
If you are in a house, and you are well armed, if robbers come to your unarmed neighbours house and starts raping pillaging and murduring them, I think you have a duty to do something about it! to go and protect your neighbour.. That is what is happenning here, there is no crime on behalf of the west, a crime would be if we had stood by and permitted the slaughter.
If this attack achieves one thing. it will be to strengthen Gaddafi's support base.
I saw on the news thousands of his supporters surrounding his compound and offering themselves as human shields in the way the Serbs did so he has no need of hostages.