SpookyFrank
A cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel
Yes, you’d expect medics to take such a stance. Matt Hancock on the other hand...
It'll be medics doing the vaccinating, not Hancock.
Yes, you’d expect medics to take such a stance. Matt Hancock on the other hand...
You don't really have to actively read or look for the stuff - it's all over social media with once-relatively normal people reacting and busy 'asking questions' as if compulsory vaccinations are already enshrined in current government policy.I knew that - but was wondering if there was anything (report, more particular conspiracy theory etc.) that might have made it more specific to the 'possibility' of compulsory vaccination for Covid, in the UK.
Like Rutita1 I don't read anti-vax stuff.
I also think that informed questioning of a very quickly developed vaccine is OK (though I would have it, and so would many other people who may be slightly uncomfortable with the speed of its development). It's this fallacy about an enforced vaccine that gets me.
Hancock is such a cunt that I'm reluctant to give him any breaks, but I am prepared to give him one here. He was very, very far from ruling it in. He just refused to totally rule it out. And given that they haven't really got a proper plan yet, what else could he say? It's a total non-story.You don't really have to actively read or look for the stuff - it's all over social media with once-relatively normal people reacting and busy 'asking questions' as if compulsory vaccinations are already enshrined in current government policy.
Apart from a few WhatsApp groups I don't do social media - I give FB a wide berth and only read Twitter threads where there's a link to something I may be interested in (such as on here).You don't really have to actively read or look for the stuff - it's all over social media with once-relatively normal people reacting and busy 'asking questions' as if compulsory vaccinations are already enshrined in current government policy.
Hancock is such a cunt that I'm reluctant to give him any breaks, but I am prepared to give him one here. He was very, very far from ruling it in. He just refused to totally rule it out. And given that they haven't really got a proper plan yet, what else could he say? It's a total non-story.
I have to say, my social media feeds are blissfully absent of most anti-vaxx stuff, ironically save for a couple of NHS groups that are usually dismaying at it but also will have the odd genuine anti-vaxx post every now and again.You don't really have to actively read or look for the stuff - it's all over social media with once-relatively normal people reacting and busy 'asking questions' as if compulsory vaccinations are already enshrined in current government policy.
I have to say, my social media feeds are blissfully absent of most anti-vaxx stuff, ironically save for a couple of NHS groups that are usually dismaying at it but also will have the odd genuine anti-vaxx post every now and again.
No, but we can detain people and treat them for tb against their will.^ This. It annoys me that the issue of 'forced vaccination' has become so great.
Anyone, feel free to correct me, but there is no history of forced vaccination in this country AFAIK and I'm not aware that a Covid vaccine is likely to be the first.
It'll be medics doing the vaccinating, not Hancock.
There is however a difference between enforced treatment of someone who already has a disease, whether TB or COVID, and enforcing a vaccination intended to prevent them catching it.No, but we can detain people and treat them for tb against their will.
I'm fine with mandatory vaccination if it turns out that's what's needed to confer protection to the vulnerable in my society. You don't have the right to kill other people, in my opinion.
I don't think that's an absolute, though. Covid has less than 1% mortality rate, perhaps half that now that treatment's improved, and much less than that for younger people. But if it had an 80% mortality rate across age groups as the bubonic plague did during the first pandemics in the Middle Ages, there would be far more inclination to make vaccination compulsory.There is however a difference between enforced treatment of someone who already has a disease, whether TB or COVID, and enforcing a vaccination intended to prevent them catching it.
Whatever the medical benefits, mandatory vaccination would, I think, be politically unacceptable.
We (and I mean we as a society, not just a handful of COVID denying nutters) don't even seem to be able to accept shutting non-essential parts of the economy for a few weeks and proper enforcement of wearing masks in public without huge amounts of special pleading about why the rules shouldn't apply to people who claim they're special.
He should have been sacked 30 mins after being appointedIt'll be medics doing the vaccinating, not Hancock.
He should have been sacked 30 mins after being appointed
Think about it againI was not aware of a minimum time limit.
I like how Lawrence Fox has become such a nobody that he's barely been mentioned for the last two pages on his very own thread.
Think about it again
Lawrence Cunt then.And had his name mis-spelled..
Lawrence Cunt then.
I'm finding it hard to drum up the fucks to give tbh.
It'd have been Hancock's half hour
Where ? Like any arts community, the theatre and film community is on which overwhelmingly holds liberal and centre left views. Why would they hire an outspoken bigot ?