nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Diddums. But 99%? Do you have any evidence to support that figure?you have a solution that would not atract the violent disaproval of 99% of the European electorate?
Last edited:
Diddums. But 99%? Do you have any evidence to support that figure?you have a solution that would not atract the violent disaproval of 99% of the European electorate?
So, let me get this straight: you're against the free movement of people? Also, where are these "open borders"? I'd like to see them.Only if you support complete Open Borders, there is no easy answers and that includes OB.
For some folk on this thread, the only valid economic migrants are our beloved 'ex-pats'.also economic refugees
Yeah, trust you to support sending a warship to the Med. Next, you'll be demanding that the same warship fires on refugees. You have no humanity. None whatsoever.Could that be HMS Lancaster?
ICYMI, these people are fleeing conflict. What would you do if you were in their position? Stay and die?What wrong with being anti immigration and why is it bullshit?
Are you shouting "racist" for people that disagree perchance?
None of them were fleeing war zones. Your point in relation to the OP is what exactly?East Anglia has struggled to assimilate 300,000 Eastern Europeans (I am always astounded to hear the oft repeated statement that support for UKIP arises in places which has experienced the least immigration - a statement easily refuted in Wisbech, Spalding, Thetford, Yarmouth) so I dread to imagine the potential upheaval created by massive refugee diasporas. Housing, for example. In a capital where demand already outstrips supply (although this is disputed) I fail to see how councils will deal with an influx of many thousands more.
What a shit rebuttal. It actually betrays the inner workings of your foetid mind.post pictures of dead children all you like, but that doesn't make policy any easier - if i posted 10,000 pictures of dead Syrian children would you suddenly decide that UK military intervention on the ground was the correct policy?
Where are these "open borders", Mr Compassion?So now anyone who doesn't favour open borders is a kipper.
Yeah, trust you to support sending a warship to the Med. Next, you'll be demanding that the same warship fires on refugees. You have no humanity. None whatsoever.
That's not a very good question and it's predicated on the notion that only warships are suitable for search and rescue. Have another go and next time, try to think critically.What other ship is designed to look for other ships and has small boats and a helicopter to pull people out of the sea?
That's not a very good question and it's predicated on the notion that only warships are suitable for search and rescue. Have another go and next time, try to think critically.
This was you from #166Which ship would you send then?
The military can break and smash things
Please explain what relevance 'open borders has to this thread, aside from derailing it?So now anyone who doesn't favour open borders is a kipper.
For some folk on this thread, the only valid economic migrants are our beloved 'ex-pats'.
Those of you who complain about "economic migrants" ....
Yeah, trust you to support sending a warship to the Med. Next, you'll be demanding that the same warship fires on refugees. You have no humanity. None whatsoever.
Where are these "open borders", Mr Compassion?
I can understand your point, and your despair and anger, but as was asked what would be your solution?What is "mass migration" aside from a over-dramatisation? I'm only surprised you haven't tried to paint a picture of invading armies and filthy hordes.
"Righteous indignation"? Hilarious.
Let 'em drown, eh? You're a real humanitarian.
No, you're projecting; it's you who's the thick cunt. You've used this thread to indulge in your opposition to immigration. You haven't got a humanitarian bone in your mean-spirited body.Fuck me, you're a thick cunt.
Why not read the thread and respond to what's actually posted rather than shit you imagine?
You ask me for a solution when you sit here and offer nothing but outrage over immigration when this is a humanitarian issue?I can understand your point, and your despair and anger, but as was asked what would be your solution?
No, you're the disgrace for using this thread to indulge in your opposition to immigration. No compassion. No sympathy. Just cold heartedness. How did you become such a hateful specimen of humanity? I'm only surprised you haven't told me that compassion is a liberal luxury.You're a fucking disgrace.
Unintentionally hilarious and smug with it. That's quite an achievement.So picking you up for bullshitting is nitpicking?
Stop lying and misrepresenting people please.
Who's done that then?
This is a humanitarian catastrophe and all you can do is indulge in this kind of shite. You're a nasty piece of work, pal.Let me guess, the answer is to remove all the borders and let everyone live wherever they want to?
Whine, whine, whine. Oh, the melodrama! Mr De Mille is ready for your close up, Miss Desmond.Not on these boards.
That's not a very good question and it's predicated on the notion that only warships are suitable for search and rescue. Have another go and next time, try to think critically.
No, you're projecting; it's you who's the thick cunt. You've used this thread to indulge in your opposition to immigration.
I've imagined nothing, pal.
Whine, whine, whine. Oh, the melodrama! Mr De Mille is ready for your close up, Miss Desmond.