Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jamie Oliver is STILL a massive cahnt

wait , so if you eat a hamburger that's not from a botulism wagon on the side of the A303 you're like jamie oliver?

eh?:confused: :D

i mean that much of the "eateries" in London you could only afford to go to let alone on a regular basis, if you ARE jamie oliver lol

nobody ever mentioned the a303
 
I saw Jamie's dream academy some time ago, which I did enjoy mainly because of Starkey and Rankin, but I noticed during it that Oliver drove a Range Rover Sport.

Range Rover sport drivers are in my estimation pricks of the highest order. It is a statement that - in an accident with me, normal car drivers are going to get hurt, but me, I will be fine because I am a rich tosser and I don't care about anyone else in my gas guzzling uber car, for uber mensch like me!!
 
Just pop into Sainsbury's and pick up some mussels and cherry tomatoes and offer them 60p at the checkout. When they call security just tell them Jamie said it was ok :hmm:
Drag in a telly that somebody has left outside their house, then go round with a basket. Fill it with organic only obviously, no ready meals.
 
Oh god, shut up with the shop-worn we need to dialogue head teacher shit.

This is a thread about a cunt being a cunt. Not a useful social intervention predicated on PEOPLE SHUTTING DEBATE DOWN and people just wanting to so their social duty. When did you become so fucking boring liam?

:) Never been called a head teacher before.

I find all this dismissing of people as 'cunts' boring.

I think this is a fascinating subject, far from boring and hugely political. But projecting all kinds of meanings onto what Jamie Oliver says or doesn't say is just a left-wing version of Daily Mail-esque frothing. The myth that it's eating fat that makes you fat... rather than eating the addictive poison that is sugar... is political. The ridiculous notion that all food should be 'tasty' (surely it should be mostly fuel?) is political. The fact that gorging on sugary shite can be widely perceived as an 'entitlement'... as expressing our freedom of choice... is somehow giving two fingers to 'the man' is political.

But never mind that... cos 'Jamie Oliver's a cunt'.
 
Protein leads to lustful thoughts.
StanleyGreenplacard.jpg
 
:) Never been called a head teacher before.

I find all this dismissing of people as 'cunts' boring.

I think this is a fascinating subject, far from boring and hugely political. But projecting all kinds of meanings onto what Jamie Oliver says or doesn't say is just a left-wing version of Daily Mail-esque frothing. The myth that it's eating fat that makes you fat... rather than eating the addictive poison that is sugar... is political. The ridiculous notion that all food should be 'tasty' (surely it should be mostly fuel?) is political. The fact that gorging on sugary shite can be widely perceived as an 'entitlement'... as expressing our freedom of choice... is somehow giving two fingers to 'the man' is political.

But never mind that... cos 'Jamie Oliver's a cunt'.

Why doesn't he make a program attacking the amount people are expected to live on while he sits on £150m? Instead of preaching about how to turn stale bread into a delicacy, from his ivory fucking tower. That's politics, Liam.
 
I've only read the Indy article and 2 pages of this thread (I've noted someone's comment that he is a UKIP supporter), could someone inform the uninformed on what Oliver said about the migrant workers or it's the usual DM shit?, thanks:

0gKts64h.jpg
 
Aside from the price of food, the time it takes to cook a meal is surely also an issue? Working a full-day, picking kids up from school/childcare, then getting them to do their homework whilst cooking from scratch is pretty hard, especially compared to being a middle-class stay-at-home mum/dad who has had all day to prepare it.

Obviously haven't watched Jamie's 30 Minute Meals then.... :p
 
Ainsley Harriot could make a meal from anything in less than half an hour on Ready Steady Cook :mad: They're just not trying, these people.
 
He may be a cunt. But there"s plenty more of them calling him a cunt on here.

The "working class" will either liberate itself or the system will continue. And that liberation will not come through eating crap. No matter how much you think it ought to. Continuing to eat crap, allowing the ruling class to make money out of malnourishment, bad nutrition and unhealthy food merely plays into their hands. If you don't like Jamie Oliver, fair enough, he is a cunt. But what are you doing to prolong the lives of the poor or provide healthy alternatives? Oh no, I forgot, we've got to wait for the revolution. :rolleyes:
 
The '32-inch flat screen telly' thing popped up in some shit judgemental Daily Mail article a few months ago, as if this was some sort of luxury item. They're, what, £150 for a cheap shit one these days? Less than a hundred second hand, maybe forty or fifty notes off gumtree if you look about, sometimes free from friends/relatives. Someone tell Middle England that Plasma tellies don't cost two grand anymore. It's an anachronistic stick to beat the 'welfare scroungers'.

We shouldn't be asking politicians if they know the price of milk, ask them about the price of bottom-rung tellies.

Also bear in mind some people in poverty have worked in the past and have bought nice things when they've worked, or received gifts from relatives. You don't rescind the right to these items when you start signing on.

You get the feeling the Mail would like people to live in tents or something, it's not fair that the workless have homes, those homes could provide valuable buy-to-let investments for the equity-rich middle classes.


moving towards less eligibility...
 
Back
Top Bottom