The things is, those aren't the sentences written - and as far as I can work out there is no equivalent to the whole horrendous trans "debate". The use of the word "transphobia" to rule out any criticism of a political position such as gender critical feminism as motivated only by "hate" has no analogue anywhere else and this is why I am so baffled and confused by this issue.
To return to the original post can you at least highlight the "transphobic" sentences?
This is a genuine question.
Does someone have to have to use a sexist term in order to be sexist?
(You can apply this to racism of homopobia)
Surely there are people who act in a discriminatory way without using obviously abusive terms.
As a mixed raced black person I have my ideas taken by white people and presented as their own. That attitude can be(and has been) part of racist behaviour.
I have had people mock the smell or look of some of the food I grew up with. That can also be part of racist behaviour.
There are things in that statement that make me mistrust the motives of the person that wrote it.
For example ...
"No, I wouldn't like to talk about it. I have not said one thing that is transphobic (which has become a meaningless word as it is used so often)."
That mirrors stuff right wingers say about racism.
Also ....
"Is it OK for a person to claim to be disabled because they "feel disabled" and claim all the protections and systems put in place to allow disabled people to be equal within society?"
Many disabled people are treated poorly because they have "invisible" disabilities and are made to feel like they falsely claiming these protections.
And the the about Bob Marley comes across appallingly imho.
I have no idea what this person's politics are but that statement was (at best) piss poor.