fractionMan
Custom Title
Yeah, sorry about that. My psychic diagnostic tools are on the blink.
It's hard to say.So, Shibboleth had an update recently didn't it? Tbh without more info it's hard to tell if it was a shibboleth problem or something at the vendor's end.
Here's is the legendary original thread: http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/threads/218366-Welsh-Labour-Closing-Down-Bulletin-Boards
"At the age of 28 Jonathan was elected to Pontypridd Town Council, and noted a similar path to former US President Bill Clinton, who was also elected unopposed to public office shortly after graduating from law school."
Internet comedy gold.
Some may say that planning a community websites so badly that it was unable to sustain itself speaks volumes of your own inadequacies and shortcomings in this area. I'd tend to agree.
Your websites weren't successes. They were failures and you let the users down.
Part of the process of building successful on-line communities involves thorough and extensive planning and research, and by cobbling together a site that flopped because of your poor financial planning, you've actually left users worse off.
What were the names of these sites please? I'm sure they would have been indexed by Google
Llantrisant Online's forum appears to have attracted no more than three posters (including yourself) before turning into another of your self promoting personal websites.They were: A Guide to Robin Hood and Northern England - http://www.robin-hood.uk.com - and Llantrisant Online - http://www.llantrisant.info. The latter one is still in the Internet archives, where you should be able to see how I followed Derek Powazek's guidelines for closing an online community.
Am I the only one here?
Am I the only one posting here ... where is everyone ?
Jonathan is currently updating his website
You're really showing us how it's done here Mr Internet Expert.
No, I describe how it is done here:
http://www.crocels.com
Increasing participation in online communities
How did that work out for your communities then?
Why should anyone take your comments on, "increasing participation in online communities" seriously when your own, badly planned and short-lived attempt only attracted three users (including yourself) before collapsing in a heap of total fail?No, I describe how it is done here:
http://www.crocels.com
Stop trying to make money out of this community by spamming your associate links to irrelevant books. Last warning.You can read about them in this conference proceedings:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Proceedings...tion-Centred-Design-of-E-Learning-Communities
Why should anyone take your comments on, "increasing participation in online communities" seriously
So in your opinion, managing to attract three people to a board which promptly collapsed because the idiot in charge was too stupid to plan ahead and consider how it would be funded is your idea of a successful "online community", is it?All these people do, including Jenny Preece:
http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?cites=10037623329700496756&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=2000&hl=en
I've no idea who Jenny Preece is, btw.
She's an online community expert.
But with your laughable attempt at an online community only attracting three posters (including yourself) before collapsing due to poor planning, you, clearly, are not an 'online community expert.'She's an online community expert.
She's an online community expert.
got to love the name dropping. there's probably a dozen numpties like bishop telling people how important they all are because they are quoting each other in papers in one pathetic little circle jerk.
fogbat, please append "Online Community Expert" to my achievements on your website.
Thank you.
Is one of the 88 types the "two fat ladies" type?
On a vaguely related note, when trying to figure out the answer to "is this person a member of the university and what are their access rights?” Cardiff university have just finished identifying 88 distinct types* of users of their systems.
Isn't identity management fun!
* not including sub-types