Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it fractionMan's fault?

Some may say that planning a community websites so badly that it was unable to sustain itself speaks volumes of your own inadequacies and shortcomings in this area. I'd tend to agree.

Your websites weren't successes. They were failures and you let the users down.

Part of the process of building successful on-line communities involves thorough and extensive planning and research, and by cobbling together a site that flopped because of your poor financial planning, you've actually left users worse off.

What were the names of these sites please? I'm sure they would have been indexed by Google

They were: A Guide to Robin Hood and Northern England - http://www.robin-hood.uk.com - and Llantrisant Online - http://www.llantrisant.info. The latter one is still in the Internet archives, where you should be able to see how I followed Derek Powazek's guidelines for closing an online community.
 
They were: A Guide to Robin Hood and Northern England - http://www.robin-hood.uk.com - and Llantrisant Online - http://www.llantrisant.info. The latter one is still in the Internet archives, where you should be able to see how I followed Derek Powazek's guidelines for closing an online community.
Llantrisant Online's forum appears to have attracted no more than three posters (including yourself) before turning into another of your self promoting personal websites.

Example post:
Am I the only one here?
Am I the only one posting here ... where is everyone ?

And that's your idea of a successful community is, it? :facepalm:

As for http://www.robin-hood.uk.com, that seems to have underperformed so hopelessly that it may as well have never existed as far as Google is concerned.

You're really showing us how it's done here Mr Internet Expert.
 
So in your opinion, managing to attract three people to a board which promptly collapsed because the idiot in charge was too stupid to plan ahead and consider how it would be funded is your idea of a successful "online community", is it?

And you think that your experience - along with your other site that was such a flop Google didn't even bother to index it - makes you qualified to lecture others about how a community should be run, yes?

I've no idea who Jenny Preece is, btw.
 
She's an online community expert.

She can't be that much of an expert if those actually managing one of the largest online communities haven't heard of her, can she?

Btw, re the abject failure of your online communities - did you ever consider the possibility that it may have been the subject matter?
 
got to love the name dropping. there's probably a dozen numpties like bishop telling people how important they all are because they are quoting each other in papers in one pathetic little circle jerk.
 
got to love the name dropping. there's probably a dozen numpties like bishop telling people how important they all are because they are quoting each other in papers in one pathetic little circle jerk.

You've pretty much summed up academia there.
 
fogbat, please append "Online Community Expert" to my achievements on your website.

Thank you.
 
On a vaguely related note, when trying to figure out the answer to "is this person a member of the university and what are their access rights?” Cardiff university have just finished identifying 88 distinct types* of users of their systems.

Isn't identity management fun!

* not including sub-types
 
Fogbat, can I be a ''stakeholder representative in the oline community stakeholder community'', please?

Actually no, can I be ''A Big Man''?


cheers.
 
On a vaguely related note, when trying to figure out the answer to "is this person a member of the university and what are their access rights?” Cardiff university have just finished identifying 88 distinct types* of users of their systems.

Isn't identity management fun!

* not including sub-types

Obviously, you have Lurker, Troll, Big Man, Flirt, Snert, E-venger, MHBFY Jenny, Chat Room Bob, Ripper, Wizard and Iconoclast. I can't think what the other 77 types might be.
 
Back
Top Bottom