Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Elon Musk the greatest visionary or the greatest snake oil salesman of our age?

Its batshit...but so is the US legal system particularly when it comes to corporate rights. Presumably the lawyers think there's a case that can be won! (or have managed to talk Musk into believing it)
 
Last edited:
Yaccarino looks like a complete maniac in that post, wtf is up with her hand gestures?
If you ever watched HBO's Rome it's like when he goes for election and does the traditional wooden gestures that are supposed to accompany oratory.
 
Yaccarino looks like a complete maniac in that post, wtf is up with her hand gestures?

I guess she’s coming to terms with the grim reality that she was hired to regain the trust of the big advertising brands to Twitter and instead she’s starring into the lens slagging them off in a way that could only appeal to such luminaries as @tommy4evah, @MAGA_INCEL666, and @hornyracistteenfuckyou.
 
According to Musk, it's a conspiracy rather than just a number of individual companies deciding to boycott

Elon Musk sues Unilever and Mars over X 'boycott'


Elon Musk's X/Twitter is suing a group of major companies, alleging that they unlawfully conspired to boycott the site. It accuses the food giants Unilever and Mars, private healthcare company CVS Health, and renewable energy firm Orsted - along with a trade association called the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) - of depriving it of "billions of dollars" in advertising revenue. The lawsuit relates to the period in 2022 just after Mr Musk bought X, then known as Twitter, when advertising revenue dived. Some companies had been wary of advertising on the platform amid concerns that its new owner was not serious enough about removing harmful online content.
 
And GARM actually exists. :eek: it sounded like a made up acroynym like DERP or TWAT

The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) is a cross-industry initiative established in 2019 by the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) to help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization via advertising.
but why would it not want to advertise on twitter?
GARM was set up in the wake of the Christchurch Mosque shootings in which the killer livestreamed the attack on Facebook. This followed a slew of high-profile cases where brands’ advertisements appeared next to illegal or harmful content, such as child pornography and content promoting terrorism. This included the 2017 London Times exposé entitled “Big brands fund terror through online adverts.”

fair enough eh :thumbs:

I'd have thought GARM looks pretty safe unless the decision goes all the way up to the Supreme Court.
 
Back
Top Bottom