If a mega-billionaire donates 2.4% of his fortune to charity but no charity gets any money, does it actually count as philanthropy?
That’s a lingering question surrounding Elon Musk, the Tesla chief executive and world’s wealthiest person, over the past month. A terse regulatory filing in mid-February disclosed that Musk, who is currently worth $235 billion according to Bloomberg, had earmarked $5.7 billion worth of his Tesla shares for charity in late November. And yes, that’s the only detail Musk has provided about where the shares have gone: “To charity,” according to the bare-bones prose in the SEC’s disclosure form. No nonprofits have recently announced receiving any money from him, and Musk did not respond to several Fortune requests for comment.
On paper, his $5.7 billion donation vaulted Musk up the ranks of the country’s most generous philanthropists in 2021—second only to the $15 billion donated by Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates to their joint foundation last year, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy. But it’s also possible that Musk hasn’t yet given away a single cent of this largesse.
All of us are only too aware of the fact that we only waste time posting nonsense on the internet due to not being multi mega billionaires.FWIW if I had his money and tech I'd be busy solving world hunger rather than shitposting on twitter.
All of us are only too aware of the fact that we only waste time posting nonsense on the internet due to not being multi mega billionaires.
What's that they say in Lassie? Elon has fallen into a dopamine ego wank loop of disastrous decisions?We're moving offices and there's a competition going on as we speak to come up with a naming convention for meeting rooms.
Along with all the yawnsome standards (Computing Pioneers! London Landmarks! etc), Famous Dogs is still in the running.
'I'll meet you in Lassie at 4.'
'The Finance Team are in Rin Tin Tin.'
(Probably insensitive to mention Laika.)
Its weird. There's a small part that feels a bit sorry for him, stress on the small. There's a slight sense of tragedy with this guy.
If sure we could have some Skippy the Bush Kangaroo/Gentle Ben getting lost in the bush/eaten by an alligator crossover episodes too.What's that they say in Lassie? Elon has fallen into a dopamine ego wank loop of disastrous decisions?
I think if you put a dog, a kangaroo and a bear together...that's not a cross over episode that's a call out for the RSPCA. Thank fuck you have an alligator to deal with thatIf sure we could have some Skippy the Bush Kangaroo/Gentle Ben getting lost in the bush/eaten by an alligator crossover episodes too.
We do a lot of work with a bank and they have a LOT of bureaucracy, regulations, redundancy etc etc, for precisely these reasons.Ah, attempts to be a bank by people that have no understanding of banks, have never been involved with banking operations, risk, compliance or any other banking area.
Things always look they should be easy when you conveniently ignore all the complications.
The reason why banking looks “inefficient” is because those inefficiencies are there to protect the consumer as well as prevent things like money laundering. Banks have to comply with regulations around loads of things to this end. For example:
Etc etc etc.
- operational resilience (like, how do you make sure that consumers’ transactions and accounts are protected even if software fails or a third party that the system relies on goes bankrupt)
- conduct (making sure that consumers’ lack of knowledge about complex financial products doesn’t cause them to be taken advantage of)
- capital and liquidity (mitigating damage from bank runs or contagion from elsewhere in the market)
- risk management (making sure they are identifying and monitoring emerging risks)
- communications (making sure they aren’t misleading and are clear)
You can’t be a bank or anything that looks vaguely like a bank without complying with these regulations and being licensed accordingly.
Oh, and did I mention that the regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction? So you’re going to have to have that compliance and the corporate governance that ensure it everywhere you want to be a bank.
TLDR: what Elon wants isn’t possible even in the medium term in the US, Europe, UK etc unless he also buys a bank that is already licensed in those jurisdictions (who will then prevent him from doing a lot of the things he thinks he wants to do).
Yes! Do it!We're moving offices and there's a competition going on as we speak to come up with a naming convention for meeting rooms.
Along with all the yawnsome standards (Computing Pioneers! London Landmarks! etc), Famous Dogs is still in the running.
'I'll meet you in Lassie at 4.'
'The Finance Team are in Rin Tin Tin.'
(Probably insensitive to mention Laika.)
I have no say whatsoever. It's going to be something deadly dull, isn't it?Yes! Do it!
BoooorrriiiinnnggggI have no say whatsoever. It's going to be something deadly dull, isn't it?
'See you in Turing at 12!'
Don't forget to take the toaster into the bath so you can immediately wash any stray jam from your skin.Of course make sure to switch the toaster on before you start, as heat rises and this helps to counteract the gravity holding the pop tart inside
Lazy, never quite sees things through.What are you in 7 words.
I have no say whatsoever. It's going to be something deadly dull, isn't it?
'See you in Turing at 12!'
Of course they do.lol a company I work for has a meeting room called Turing. They also have Ada Lovelace though.
I read that as musk fanny and was about to suggest you shower.
Linda Yaccarino, Twitter’s chief executive, went to Hollywood this week in a bid to woo talent agencies and entertainers days after owner Elon Musk announced the social media app’s sudden corporate rebranding to X. Yaccarino met agents at Creative Artists Agency and United Talent Agency in Los Angeles, pitching her vision for X in a bid to bring stars and influencers from cooking to music and sports on to the social media platform, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. The chief executive also held meetings with Disney, one person said. (...)
One person who attended the meeting with CAA said that Yaccarino, the former advertising head at NBCUniversal, told agents on Tuesday to “dream up what they would want and that X will try to build it”.
Reach out for the stars
And when that rainbow's shining over you
That's when your dreams will all come true
Today the richest man in the world woke up and thought, I know, an open call for conspiracy theories that’s what’s needed.
View attachment 384863Replies so far are mostly about how climate change isn’t real. Maybe he’s a cynic doing it for clicks but I think it’s not that.
he's a couping cunt - deserves a painful death bolivian-sourced lithium poisoning would have a nice sense of justice to itIts weird. There's a small part that feels a bit sorry for him, stress on the small. There's a slight sense of tragedy with this guy.
What do you think it is then? One of my thoughts l was having before going to sleep last night, is why the fuck Musk is pushing anti-vax bullshit on his platform. The only thing I could think of is that the pathetically petulant manchild is still smarting over the Covid shutdowns, and is embracing that nuttery as a means of lashing out. Otherwise I got nothing.
Because of his feed. Remove the feed, would it be the same Musk?What do you think it is then? One of my thoughts l was having before going to sleep last night, is why the fuck Musk is pushing anti-vax bullshit on his platform. The only thing I could think of is that the pathetically petulant manchild is still smarting over the Covid shutdowns, and is embracing that nuttery as a means of lashing out. Otherwise I got nothing.
All of us are only too aware of the fact that we only waste time posting nonsense on the internet due to not being multi mega billionaires.