I have no idea. Just they are all wearing sunglasses which is statistically odd.
is wearing sunglasses a right wing twat thing now?
i've tended for years to wear (prescription) sunglasses almost if i'm outside in daylight...
Heard on a youtube vid: "go fash, lose cash"lol, all the "go woke, go broke" bros must be desperately trying to spin their owning
is wearing sunglasses a right wing twat thing now?
i've tended for years to wear (prescription) sunglasses almost if i'm outside in daylight...
goatee and oakleys - one of the biggest red flags of modern times.It's definitely a pattern that anyone on social media with an avatar showing themselves wearing a big ol' pair of (usually fake) Oakleys is almost certain to be some kind of political troglodyte.
goatee and oakleys - one of the biggest red flags of modern times.
very suspect now of most gym bros, too. i understand that is entirely my imagination and totally small minded. oh but i have seen enough, seen enough!
get on the work of Byung Chul Han mate - namely The Burnout Society and Psychopolitics. In my view, he is one of the most important voices around at the moment. He is descriptive rather than prescriptive, but the world is a lot clearer after reading him. The gym bros are the penicle of what he calls the atomised achieving subject, where the master-slave dialectic is an internal one, implamented there by neoliberal slight of hand in the guise of absoloute freedom. The end result...burnout. Exhaustion. Bewilderment.Features common to winners of the Herman Cain Award.
I don't think you're entirely off base there. Bodybuilding forums are major sources/promoters of so-called "bro science", including most notably the idea that consuming soy somehow feminises men and turns them into weak lefties.
Is that like the pinnacle of being a dick?penicle
get on the work of Byung Chul Han mate - namely The Burnout Society and Psychopolitics. In my view, he is one of the most important voices around at the moment. He is descriptive rather than prescriptive, but the world is a lot clearer after reading him. The gym bros are the penicle of what he calls the atomised achieving subject, where the master-slave dialectic is an internal one, implamented there by neoliberal slight of hand in the guise of absoloute freedom. The end result...burnout. Exhaustion. Bewilderment.
It’s neoliberal subjectivity. If you’re interested, I can post up some papers. The ultra-short version is: primacy of choice, freedom from coercion and freedom to attain produces four interrelated dimensions of subjectivity.Does he also offer any explanation for why people fall for this kind of rat-race bullshit in the first place? It's just something I have trouble personally understanding. Like, it's just so much easier to not be bothered about trying to match up to some cartoonishly hypermasculine ideal of what a man's body should be, and the same goes for the kind of go-getting bullshit that encourages wage workers to go the extra unpaid mile to "advance your career". It all just sounds so fucking exhausting. I'd rather do the bare minimum to get a somewhat decently paying job - with persistence and some luck it is possible in my experience - so that I have more time and mental energy to do the shit I actually find fun.
One can't win everything, so turning all of life into a competition makes losers of everyone.
It often doesn't feel like there's much being "a leftie" is good for, but having a critique of capital does confer a degree of inoculation against hustle culture and hyper-masculinity I think. But for the broad mass of "apolitical" people it does hold promise, as long as (somewhat ironically given the pitch) you do what you're told. Commit all your youthful energy to perfection and work, and you'll get your reward init's just so much easier to not be bothered about trying to match up to some cartoonishly hypermasculine ideal of what a man's body should be, and the same goes for the kind of go-getting bullshit that encourages wage workers to go the extra unpaid mile to "advance your career". It all just sounds so fucking exhausting.
I suspect we're not going to actually have true AI unless quantum computing is actually a reality.
Why is that? I know that some have proposed that general intelligence in humans is at least a partially quantum phenomenon, but I don't think there's strong enough evidence to take the idea seriously. Neurons are squishy electrochemical things that work together in a warm and wet pulsing goop, hardly the kind of conditions suitable for quantum mechanical operations.
It's no more than a 'feeling' I have however this article may help flesh out reasons why:Why is that? I know that some have proposed that general intelligence in humans is at least a partially quantum phenomenon, but I don't think there's strong enough evidence to take the idea seriously. Neurons are squishy electrochemical things that work together in a warm and wet pulsing goop, hardly the kind of conditions suitable for quantum mechanical operations.
We’re not going to have true artificial intelligence until we stop pursuing it as something that emerges from suitably advanced algorithm logic. We’re not going to have it until we understand the thing we’re trying to achieve.
True, but we did need to understand that baby cows come from mummy and daddy cows. We didn’t think that if we just got enough beef together, a cow would spontaneously form.I'm not so sure that it's necessary to grok something in order to achieve it. We didn't need to understand genetics in order to start selectively breeding scraggly wild plants and panicky herd animals into a bewildering variety of crops and livestock.
We didn’t think that if we just got enough beef together, a cow would spontaneously form.