They can dine out on that for oh a few decades.
Remember when Sodhi and Wagner blocked out the last two hours in the gloom in Christchurch to clinch the series against England? NZ don't beat England very often. This is a proper high point in NZ cricket. Test cricket matters.Three?? lol!!
Why not such a long tour? It's culminated with a terrific match.
Why so few properly competitive warm-up matches on such a long tour? Is perhaps a better question. The death of the meaningful tour match is a thing that needs addressing.
Did they? Stuart Broad looked like he's finally woken up. If they looked exhausted at the end of a day when they bowled 100 overs in a desperate attempt to win a match, well that's not so surprising.England looked exhausted. It's the longest tour for decades.
Did they? Stuart Broad looked like he's finally woken up. If they looked exhausted at the end of a day when they bowled 100 overs in a desperate attempt to win a match, well that's not so surprising.
And NZ has overtaken them to move into third in the test rankings. Bit of a humiliation right there. Coaches and captains have been sacked for less than this shit run they're on.
Hmm. We're going to play five tests against them (cos money) and two against you (cos no money) and so we can get more points than you and rank higher (cos money).This'll be a function of the ranking system. It works on series won or lost, not matches. IIRC winning a two-match series is worth as much in terms of rankings as a five-match series.
Not that I'd dispute that NZ are currently a better side than England. But the rankings system is a load of bollocks.
Hmm. We're going to play five tests against them (cos money) and two against you (cos no money) and so we can get more points than you and rank higher (cos money).
Different countries have different busy times of the year. In rolling rankings there will always be movement up and down at different times for different teams. I think the tour programme does okay in terms of getting the top eight at least playing everywhere (India v Pakistan excepted). And Bangladesh have been getting a better crack at it recently. But England play five test series v India and aus and nobody else cos money and that does distort things.Quite so, see the edit to my post.
I'd personally rather watch NZ v England than the aussies at the moment. I think they deserve a five test series next time round. I understand why India's lucrative given the size of the fan base, but why Australia?
Tickets in aus are very cheap by our standards. Day at the test costs under 20 quid. Big bash is very cheap indeed. The TV deals are the big money now.More touring fans with Aus vs England. And I'm sure a test match ticket in Sydney or London costs more than one in Mumbai.
What did you expect Leach to actually do in this test given the conditions and wide context? Malan looked a better spinner than leach? I wonder why there's ex-test spinners or players lining up to say he had an excellent game and was unlucky to come away with so few wickets, but he did provide many overs of accurate clever penetrating spin that built up pressure and forced batsmen into shots they may not have played otherwise. This is test cricket - not superhero cricket.Questions have to be asked. Why such a long tour. Why one coach for all three formats. And when the fuck are they going to put Cook and Moeen out to pasture. I'm sure they'll do better in the summer at home but apparently this is the worst overseas run since WW2. There have to be better options than Stoneman, Vince and Leach. Malan looked a better spinner than him ffs.
Indeed well done Kiwis. I'm happy with the result and that they won the series. Bit of squeaky bum time at the end and a nice tense finish. Sodhi held his nerve well and also had a bit of luck.Yes they can. Well deserved series win for nz and after five months this tour is finally over. Thank fuck for that.
Actually I got this slightly wrong. In the case of this winter's tours by England, it's:Hmm. We're going to play five tests against them (cos money) and two against you (cos no money) and so we can get more points than you and rank higher (cos money).
Flintoff has a massive dig at Vaughan.
Some ball-tampering critics are chucking stones in glass houses - Andrew Flintoff
Doesn't want to bag them? Only talking about one person.