exosculate
a stagger with a beat
ResistanceMP3 said:so why would you talk to a member of cult?
Fraternal Greetings, ResistanceMP3
In the forlorn hope of saving you
Immigration .. part of neo liberalism/Thatcherism??
- Thread starter durruti02
- Start date
In the forlorn hope of saving you
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
exosculate said:
you must be joking. You cannot be serious. You think you're apolitical insults will draw me closer to the true revolutionaries? you are more deluded than I thought.despite your sectarianism, the door is always open, to work together upon that which we agree. Fraternally yours, ResistanceMP3
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
ResistanceMP3 said:
despite your sectarianism, the door is always open, to work together upon that which we agree. Fraternally yours, ResistanceMP3
As mad as a hatstand.
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
a hatstand cannot suffer from mental illness, so I would say your analogy is roughly correct.exosculate said:
edited to add: I have just gone back through your last dozen contributions, which one of them would you suggest is less apolitical than a hatstand? It seems to me they were Seven parts abuse, three parts cheer leading Mr Baldwin and Dur.
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
ResistanceMP3 said:a hatstand cannot suffer from mental illness, so I would say your analogy is roughly correct.
edited to add: I have just gone back through your last dozen contributions, which one of them would you suggest is less apolitical than a hatstand? It seems to me they were Seven parts abuse, three parts cheer leading Mr Baldwin and Dur.
Are you crazed obsessive stalker too.
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
I am just not prepared to give the child the last word she so desperately craves.prove me wrong.exosculate said:
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
ResistanceMP3 said:I am just not prepared to give the child the last word she so desperately craves.prove me wrong.
Aren't you missing your anti-blood transfusion workshop?
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
I don't get that one, can you explain?exosculate said:
durruti02 said:
Yes, immigration serves a number of purposes to capitalism.
(1) Migrants will accept lower pay therby pressuring wages downwards.
(2) Migrants less likely to be in/join a trade union.
(3) Illegal migrants can be paid below minimum wage and exploited.
(4) Illegal migrants cannot join a trade union.
(5) Racial tensions stoke division in the working class and resulting increase in support for right wing/far right parties.
(6) Agency employment is less secure and carries less benefits than full time work and proper jobs.
All this makes a mockery of the wealthy middle class SWP entering white working class areas screeching "racists" and "lumpen-scum", whilst waving placards declaring that "Asylum seekers are welcome here".
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
John Grean said:
Thats nail on head - they have an absolute disconnection with reality.
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
honest question, where have they done that?treelover said:
q_w_e_r_t_y
You see an investment scam and I see divinity
Sighthill in the aftermath of the murder of Firsat Dag
The SSP had to sit on them quite severely to stop them destroying all the good work that we had done there in both the indigenous population and aslyum seeker community.
The SSP had to sit on them quite severely to stop them destroying all the good work that we had done there in both the indigenous population and aslyum seeker community.
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
people were screeching "racists" and "lumpen-scum", whilst waving placards declaring that "Asylum seekers are welcome here"?q_w_e_r_t_y said:
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=4248
Correction: last week's report on the attack on Iranian refugee Masood Gomroki in Sighthill, Glasgow, stated that it was "likely" that the assault on Masood would lead to a sharpening of racial tensions in the community. It should have read that, as a consequence of the good work done between asylum seekers and refugees in Sighthill over the last 16 months, an increase in tensions was unlikely. http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=4225
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
go on, give me a clue, who would you consider impartial on the topic of Socialist-Worker?tbaldwin said:
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
ResistanceMP3 said:go on, give me a clue, who would you consider impartial on the topic of Socialist-Worker?
What do the seventh day adventists think?
TremulousTetra
prismatic universe
"Aren't you missing your anti-blood transfusion workshop?" wtf does that mean?exosculate said:
tbaldwin said:
Absolutely. The aforementioned Gate Gourmet incident, amongst others, may have made a lot of people think on that issue. It certainly did for me. I used to be for open borders and the 'free' movement of Labour but a lot has happened in the recent past, that actually made me think about the issue seriously and realise my naviety.
For the all talk of what Marx said on migration earlier, is there not also a part of the Communist manifesto that talks about workers dealing with the ruling class in their own country first?. Doesn't that indirectly say something about economic migration?. It's been a hard one to accept, given my parents were economic migrants and I've been lucky enough to probably have a better standard of living because of it but I can't say I agree with it anymore.
John Grean said:Yes, immigration serves a number of purposes to capitalism.
(1) Migrants will accept lower pay therby pressuring wages downwards.
(2) Migrants less likely to be in/join a trade union.
(3) Illegal migrants can be paid below minimum wage and exploited.
(4) Illegal migrants cannot join a trade union.
(5) Racial tensions stoke division in the working class and resulting increase in support for right wing/far right parties.
(6) Agency employment is less secure and carries less benefits than full time work and proper jobs.QUOTE]
i only just noticed this of course obvioulsy JG was a racist and was just trolling(and clearlly i am too
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
More thread archaeology, durutti?
dennisr
the acceptable face
And that good work was despite the SWP. The SWP had just recently (at the time..) joined the then SSP. They tried the usual tactic of ignoring the wishes of the rest of the SSP in their propaganda approach - luckily they were bought back in line by the rest of the SSP.
I could talk about locally -Southwark - loads of then SA placards (read SWP students imposing thier version of the SA over the local members) turn up on a demonstration against the NF marching with 'asylum seekers welcome here banners'. Weirdly not even the NF had raised asylum seekers!! - talk about having the sensitivity of single celled plant life. I'm sure the asylum seekers left behind when the SWP placard wavers had gone home felt much more comfortable
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
More thread archaeology, durutti?
More "look how prescient I am!" than relevance, though.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
I see, durutti is regarded by you as some sort of latter day Oracle at Delphi?
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
aren't they just. His daft claims are falling apart at a quicker rates of knots than normal.
(or did you not really know what 'chickens coming home to roost' actually means?)
Similar threads
