TeeJay said:You keep banging on about "plundering the third world of skilled labours" but there is never a fixed supply of skilled workers. Many people only train to be nurses etc because they can pay for their training and find work in richer countries. It is simply untrue that these people would have trained anyway, or that they would be able to find the same jobs in their own countries. For people to be employed there need to be jobs in the first place - something that you completely ignore in your bogus arguments.
Furthermore, even if it seems to you like there are a *lot* of immigrants, in fact the numbers are very small when compared with the large populations of many developing countries. Other jobs are outsourced to these countries, money is sent back, skills are taken back, connections made and trade increases - all of whoch benefit the developing economies.
.
Ive realy dealt with these points before but you must have missed them.
The reason many people in the phillipines and zimbabwe etc train to be nurses is its a way into the west.
They are obviously the people who have had the most education and the people developing countries need the most.
Your Thatcherite trickle down theory of "at least some of them send money home" does not address the fact that not many people in those countries have relatives abroad sending money home and that it can create further inequality in those countries. But i wouldnt expect an "authoritarian nationalist" to lose any sleep over that.
I have not said that exactly the same Jobs would be available at home that has never been my arguement.