How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

[bendeus]

A guy who masturbates over prepubescent kids is a poster who "deserves better"? Twisted logic there our kid.

Brilliant.

 

[Frances Lengel]

I aim to please.

Though it seems you're lacking an argument.

 

[bendeus]

I aim to please.

Though it seems you're lacking an argument.

I'm very comfortable with my position. You, in the cold light of morning, may be less so (unless you're Firky)

 

[Frances Lengel]

I'm very comfortable with my position. You, in the cold light of morning, may be less so (unless you're Firky)

Nah, I'm not The Runt cheap shot that was though, he never even liked me anyway - Skinny cuntchya.

Why are you defending a guy who made a crack about wanking off over prepubescent girls though? You've never satisfactoraly answered that.

 

[Humberto]

Attention whore

 

[Frances Lengel]

Attention, whore.

 

[bendeus]

Nah, I'm not The Runt cheap shot that was though, he never even liked me anyway - Skinny cuntchya.

Why are you defending a guy who made a crack about wanking off over prepubescent girls though? You've never satisfactoraly answered that.

You're asking the wrong question about the wrong person. You've dragged your wormy dog arse along the carpet of this thread and in so doing have accused a bunch of people, without backup, of being apologists for paedophilia, or paedophiles in the flesh. A_chap has very little to do with this; the fact that you're a twat, everything.

 

[editor]

Piss off dick -I doubt anyone's arsed about your bullshit. You're the one sticking up for him. And you spew out bile, not shit it out. Do try to keep up. Worst cunt.

Last warning for the evening. Wind your neck in please.

 

[Humberto]

Fucks sake Frances.

 

[Frances Lengel]

You're asking the wrong question about the wrong person. You've dragged your wormy dog arse along the carpet of this thread and in so doing have accused a bunch of people, without backup, of being apologists for paedophilia, or paedophiles in the flesh. A_chap has very little to do with this; the fact that you're a twat, everything.

I'm not asking any questions of a worthless trumpet such as you - Anyone who's stuck up for a_chap is suspect in my book - Let him clear the air if he can. The backup is there in the form of a_chap's decidedly dubious comment - You're an apologist - Have you got a beard coz I dunno how you could look yourself in the eye in the shaving mirror?

 

[Frances Lengel]

Last warning for the evening. Wind your neck in please.

Ok, I'm leaving it now - THe last comment was made before I saw this.

 

[bendeus]

I'm not asking any questions of a worthless trumpet such as you - Anyone who's stuck up for a_chap is suspect in my book - Let him clear the air if he can. The backup is there in the form of a_chap's decidedly dubious comment - You're an apologist - Have you got a beard coz I dunno how you could look yourself in the eye in the shaving mirror?

You fucking desperate wanker!

 

[Shippou-Sensei]

and much fun was had by all

 

[Shippou-Sensei]

Internet J'accuse are always handled with delicacy and tact.

 

[existentialist]

tbf, they have had chance to answer, as they were looking at this thread half an hour ago.

Given the way in which those of us who have merely questioned the possibilities that this was an innocent comment have been spoken to, I wouldn't blame the poster for not wanting to put himself in harm's way.

Frances has given the DM a bloody good run for its money in terms of incoherent frothing rage on this one.

 

[existentialist]

I'm not having that - Elaborate or retract.

I have no idea if he's referring to me, but I certainly found it rather ironic to find myself being accused of being a apologist for noncery. And not, I have to say, particularly pleasant - that's the point at which I reported a post.

 

[existentialist]

A guy who masturbates over prepubescent kids is a poster who "deserves better"? Twisted logic there our kid.

I should have thought that you were starting to sail extremely close to the wind, defamation-wise, by now.

 

[andysays]

Oh dear, Frances Lengel, you really have come across as an incoherent, self-righteous idiot.

I can only hope that you now get back and make some pretty grovelling apologies to the many and various people you've accused of shit here, TOTALLY unjustifiably, as far as I can see

 

[existentialist]

Oh dear, Frances Lengel, you really have come across as an incoherent, self-righteous idiot.

I can only hope that you now get back and make some pretty grovelling apologies to the many and various people you've accused of shit here, TOTALLY unjustifiably, as far as I can see

I think he has form for this, and I think that, IIRC, in the past he has come back and retracted extreme comments he's made.

I hope so - because I would like very much for him to withdraw his allegations against me, just for starters.

 

[ViolentPanda]

How do you actually know what "Is there an innapropriate wank button too?" means?

To be scrupulously fair to Frances, given JC3's usual bent for humour, those familiar with his posting style would most likely take it as him in effect saying "I've just had a wank over this photo, and I know it's inappropriate".

 

[ViolentPanda]

It could mean 'I don't like this creepy photograph'

If that was the intention, then why mention wanking or inappropriateness?

Ockham's razor.

 

[bi0boy]

To be scrupulously fair to Frances, given JC3's usual bent for humour, those familiar with his posting style would most likely take it as him in effect saying "I've just had a wank over this photo, and I know it's inappropriate".

JC didn't make the comment though, this is nothing to do with him.

 

[bi0boy]

If that was the intention, then why mention wanking or inappropriateness?

Ockham's razor.

Not everyone who mentions the word "wank" is referring to an actual incident of masturbation.

 

[ViolentPanda]

JC didn't make the comment though, this is nothing to do with him.

Fair point. I misread the mangled post because JC3 posted the picture in question (so not entirely "nothing to do with him", is it?). a_chap posted the inappropriate comment.

 

[ViolentPanda]

Not everyone who mentions the word "wank" is referring to an actual incident of masturbation.

You're so sharp that I'm surprised you haven't bled to death.

 

[Dan U]

well this thread certainly went weird.

 

[ViolentPanda]

well this thread certainly went weird.

Wanker!

 

[Dan U]

Wanker!

 

[existentialist]

If that was the intention, then why mention wanking or inappropriateness?

Ockham's razor.

Even if that were the case, a line got crossed when he started to cast aspersions against people for not joining in with his histrionics...

 

[ViolentPanda]

Even if that were the case, a line got crossed when he started to cast aspersions against people for not joining in with his histrionics...

Agreed.