Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

Just to try to keep vaguely up-to-date with the legal situation:

Operation Pallial (North Wales abuse) has arrested 8 so far, and one charged: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-23956090
John Allen (charged) just got released on bail: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-24022779

The Operation Fernbridge priest and the children's home manager appeared in court earlier in September: http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5082/priest-and-ex-manager-of-richmond-children-s-home-in-court

Former head Richard Alston was arrested on August 20th under Operation Cayacos.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/richard-alston-ex-headteacher-arrested-2258612

(That operation is the newer strand that arrested Charles Napier in June.)
 
So for anyone who read about Peter Righton or watched that 'secret life of a paedophile' documentary, Operation Cayacos seems to be the most relevant one.
 
A reminder that "Cyril Smith - The Paedophile MP" - airs tomorrow, 11.05pm, Channel 4.

It gets less attention because he was only a politician (yawn), not a CELEBRITY!!!!11!! Nor does he present much opportunity to smack the BBC about.

Yet more trivial is the fact that MI5 helped the cover up by removing files. How supremely dull. No fuss, no bother, Ch 4 are doing "better than nothing" but still sticking it out late at night. When it was Savile we never heard the last. With Smith we barely hear the beginning.
 
Last edited:
That is going to get messy. Messier.

Something from Hencke:

Paedophile MP Cyril Smith: Possible Questions for Jenny Tonge and Tim Razzall

The Met Police’s official acknowledgement to Channel Four’s Dispatches programme that Cyril Smith visited the notorious Elm House guest house in Barnes in south-west London – which is alleged to be used by paedophiles raises serious questions for the Liberal Democrats.
So far attention has been centred on former Liberal leaders, David Steel. Nick Clegg and Sir Menzies Campbell,the latter who was shown (possibly unfairly) to be heaping praise on Cyril Smith at his funeral.

But the real Liberal Democrats who should be quizzed are Baroness Tonge, Lord Razzall and Sir David Williams on the scandalous affair that allowed Cyril Smith to sexually assault young boys.

They were the Liberal members of Richmond Council in the aftermath of highly publicised police raid on Elm Guest House and responsible – along with the previous Tory administration – for the safe keeping of children in the council’s Grafton Close children’s home.
Sir David is so much in denial that he believes that the current prosecutions by the Met Police of a senior member of council staff are only being undertaken to please the press.

Lord Razzall, who later moved a motion to sack Louis Minster, director of social services, who was in charge of Richmond’s social services at the time of the alleged abuse, told me at the time – that he couldn’t remember why he moved the motion.
Click to expand...
 
Frances Lengel said:
Obviously, but why aren't more people rushing foreward to condemn the filthy nonce?
Click to expand...
You've already got one thread about it in the dustbin. It looks like noone much cares about the throwaway comment in question - it isn't really clear what it meant anyway. If you think a post should be removed or someone should get banned then take it up with the mods. It doesn't have any relevance to this thread however.
 
classicdish said:
You've already got one thread about it in the dustbin. It looks like noone much cares about the throwaway comment in question - it isn't really clear what it meant anyway. If you think a post should be removed or someone should get banned then take it up with the mods. It doesn't have any relevance to this thread however.
Click to expand...

Paedo/hebephile apologist.
 
existentialist said:
No.

But I think calling someone out as a paedo apologist for question your methods is fucking silly.
Click to expand...

Maybe but if it wasn't for "my methods" as you call them, a_chap would've slipped under the radar. An explaination from him could still make it all alright. Though I don't see how he or anyone could explain that.
 
Frances Lengel said:
Maybe but if it wasn't for "my methods" as you call them, a_chap would've slipped under the radar. An explaination from him could still make it all alright. Though I don't see how he or anyone could explain that.
Click to expand...
I've looked at the photo you're getting so excitable about, and - while it's not exactly to my taste - I'm not sure if I can see what all the fuss is about.
 
Frances Lengel said:
Dunno, ask whichever mod saw fit to put it there. But you seem to be sticking up for a middle aged guy who makes throwaway remarks anout wanking over twelve year olds. Good on you, sport.
Click to expand...
No nothing I said was sticking up for anyone:

I said:

"You've already got one thread about it in the dustbin. It looks like noone much cares about the throwaway comment in question - it isn't really clear what it meant anyway. If you think a post should be removed or someone should get banned then take it up with the mods. It doesn't have any relevance to this thread however."
 
existentialist said:
I've looked at the photo you're getting so excitable about, and - while it's not exactly to my taste - I'm not sure if I can see what all the fuss is about.
Click to expand...

I thought you were an ok guy, but on the Kevin Webster thread you bent over backwards to defend those who would besmirch the name of an innocent man. And here you are saying you don't see what the fuss is about regarding a middle aged bloke talking about wanking over a twelve year old. Shown your true colours there, big guy.
 
Frances Lengel said:
I thought you were an ok guy, but on the Kevin Webster thread you bent over backwards to defend those who would besmirch the name of an innocent man. And here you are saying you don't see what the fuss is about regarding a middle aged bloke talking about wanking over a twelve year old. Shown your true colours there, big guy.
Click to expand...
If your opinion is quite so easily swayed, it isn't worth a lot to me. I am not sure exactly what is going on, because you haven't made it clear, but I am not going to be taking your slurs too seriously on the current showing.
 
existentialist said:
I didn't see any comment on the link you posted.

Anyway, one of the refreshing things about this thread has been its focus on facts over pitchforks and flaming brands. I think your concerns about an Urban poster don't really belong here.
Click to expand...
existentialist said:
I didn't see any comment on the link you posted.

Anyway, one of the refreshing things about this thread has been its focus on facts over pitchforks and flaming brands. I think your concerns about an Urban poster don't really belong here.
Click to expand...
The fact is, under that pic of a kid is a comment from a_chap saying "Is there an inapropriate wank button too" - It's there, do you think that's alright?
 
This is the comment you are going on about:

"Is there an innapropriate wank button too?"

This *could* be taken as condemning the photograph. I am not saying I know what is meant by this comment, but why is it relevant to this thread? Take it up with the mods and/or keep it in that thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Kid_Eternity
Is a revolution possible in the UK?
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
195
Views
7K
A380
A380
tim
Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby's time is up.
2 3 4
Replies
98
Views
3K
Dom Traynor
Dom Traynor
Buddy Bradley
How long before we get a proper Tory-style sleaze gaffe from Labour?
Replies
0
Views
213
Buddy Bradley
Buddy Bradley
burtabraham
  • Poll
Should there be an elected second chamber, and how should it be elected?
2 3
Replies
63
Views
2K
Puddy_Tat
Puddy_Tat
B
The status of terms 'people of colour' and BIPOC in the UK
2 3 4 5
Replies
144
Views
7K
likesfish
likesfish
Back
Top Bottom