Diamond, if you want to hide behind the 'hasn't been tested in court/found guilty', by all means do so. But there's sufficient 'evidence' out there from previous investigations, the police astonishment that he wasn't initially charged and all the rest for the reasonable person to think there is a very good chance he did the things he's accused of. In this case, where there won't be a conventional trial, that's probably as good as it will get in terms of establishing what happened. IN those circumstances, with real victims who have been terribly abused when at their most vulnerable, your trolling proceduralism is out of order.
edit... as said much better by existentialist in 5803