Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

It's a bit weird if they are answering something Ms Forde never alleged. It turns the spotlight on the retired senior officer turned 'whistleblower'. It makes one wonder why other police forces are suddenly leaping to it. It's almost as if it were common practice to cover things up, even if that wasn't the case here.
 
Why would Wiltshire make that up?
Not obvious to me that it's necessarily about making stuff up as opposed to covering arse. Conceivably because they have no records showing what happened one way or the other. I'm more interested in why the IPCC have taken it on.

I have to say the initial story set off my 'possible bullshit' meter when it described the story as originating from a retired police officer. This wasn't alleviated by the revelation that he was a constable at the time. Every possibility that he's retailing canteen gossip rather than fact in the hope of selling a story.

As this has developed it's become a little more interesting although my response to learning that five separate forces are investigating allegations about Heath is to wonder how much of police budgets is being devoted to this, particularly given stories like this yesterday
Manchester police: Missing teen searches 'unsustainable' - BBC
 
Nope, still not following you. Are you mixing up what Wiltshire police have said recently with what the former officer alleged?
Well they said this..
“Sir Edward Heath has been named in relation to offences concerning children. He lived in Salisbury for many years and we would like to hear from anyone who has any relevant information that may assist us in our enquiries or anyone who believes they may have been a victim.
Are you suggesting that the naming went beyond Myra Forde's allegations?
 
...It makes one wonder why other police forces are suddenly leaping to it...

possibly because getting the 'scalp' of a long dead PM provides a convienient glossing over of current failures?

Wiltshire - or whoever - know that Heath will fill the papers for weeks with stories of brave rozzers challenging the establishment to uncover past misdeeds by the powerful, and will easily displace the story of the local sports coach finally being convicted after 15 years of un-acted-upon allegations.

the original allegation that a prosecution/investigation had been shelved came from a retired, senior officer. perhaps its the retired, senior officer who'se looking to muddy the waters over some impending, pension-losing, investigation..?
 
Besides I don't even know as its that important who got this ball rolling. The point is that now Heaths name is out there, every investigation into him get to call for victims to come forwards. And what happens to any particular branch of investigation into him shouldn't affect the others. If Heath was a prolific abuser then we've got some chance of learning some truth eventually, if not then maybe we'll never gain certainty on this one.
 
Really ? If we have to have multiple investigations they might at least communicate with one another.

I should have been more specific. This thread sometimes features suspicions that stinky branches may be introduced in order to scupper things. I don't think it works like that, and I'm really quite bored of all the cloak and dagger bollocks.
 
When I say bored, I probably mean frustrated. Because there is a lot of dodgy shit that actually happened, but quite a part of discovering what actually happened involves eliminating the bogus stories. So when people come up with a bunch of fresh intrigue every single step of the way, increasingly muddy waters frustrate me.
 
I should have been more specific. This thread sometimes features suspicions that stinky branches may be introduced in order to scupper things. I don't think it works like that, and I'm really quite bored of all the cloak and dagger bollocks.
Ah, I see what you mean. I entirely agree.
 
There's a high degree of incredulity expressed out there in the media, fwiw, and it's probably not helpful to the credibility of victims. There have been persistent rumours about Heath for years. Every case that turns out to be unsubstantiated or not proven increases the volume of the cries of 'witch hunt'. What is most concerning of all is the possibility that rich and powerful people haven't magically stopped abusing children and are even now getting away without being investigated and prosecuted.
 
When I say bored, I probably mean frustrated. Because there is a lot of dodgy shit that actually happened, but quite a part of discovering what actually happened involves eliminating the bogus stories. So when people come up with a bunch of fresh intrigue every single step of the way, increasingly muddy waters frustrate me.
Well, I'm sorry if my comment about how 'smelly' this story is has added to your frustration; that was not my intent.

But the way this story about Heath has emerged has all the hallmarks of an attempt at a highly choreographed example of news management. To my untrained eye it looks as though the authorities have thought long and hard about how to break this to the public.

It appears tonight that they've already moved to a national investigation, and this story seems to have grown very quickly. I suspect that the brothel-owner/retired plod story was seem as a convenient way to break the news relatively gently, but perhaps they didn't reckon on Forde blowing their story.

Former PM as paedo really is pretty big, isn't it? This is the sort of stuff that Icke & co. were on about years ago.
 
Well, I'm sorry if my comment about how 'smelly' this story is has added to your frustration; that was not my intent.

But the way this story about Heath has emerged has all the hallmarks of an attempt at a highly choreographed example of news management. To my untrained eye it looks as though the authorities have thought long and hard about how to break this to the public.

It appears tonight that they've already moved to a national investigation, and this story seems to have grown very quickly. I suspect that the brothel-owner/retired plod story was seem as a convenient way to break the news relatively gently, but perhaps they didn't reckon on Forde blowing their story.

Former PM as paedo really is pretty big, isn't it? This is the sort of stuff that Icke & co. were on about years ago.

Agree that this seems very orchestrated. I was having the same thoughts that it is probably true but being selectively released.
 
So now the prosecutor at the time for the abandoned Forde case provides a third version of events:

“On the day of her trial there was a large number of reporters at the court,” he said. “I was informed by the police that this was because the defendant, who had been on bail, had let it be known that if the case progressed as far as her having to give evidence she intended to allege that she had provided rent boys to Edward Heath.”

Seed said there was no suggestion the men were under age or “anything more than male prostitutes” and furthermore these were “unsubstantiated assertions”.

“The decision for the case to proceed no further was mine and was based on the lack of evidence and had nothing whatsoever to do with any potential allegations against Edward Heath.”

In a letter to the Times, Seed said three witnesses, all prostitutes who allegedly worked for Forde at her brothel in Salisbury, Wiltshire, failed or refused to give evidence at court, leaving him with no choice but to offer no evidence.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...e-was-dropped-over-lack-of-evidence-barrister
 
So now the prosecutor at the time for the abandoned Forde case provides a third version of events:

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...e-was-dropped-over-lack-of-evidence-barrister

My suspicion is that these conflicting accounts have little to do with noncery, and everything to do with competing interests trying to ward off action for professional misconduct. I would read her lawyer's denial in that context. Were he not a lawyer, I would be more terse and precise.
 
My suspicion is that these conflicting events have little to do with noncery, and everything to do with competing interests trying to ward off action for professional misconduct. I would read her lawyer's denial in that context. Were he not a lawyer, I would be more terse and precise.
contrasting events? contrasting accounts?
 
The various Heath investigations to be merged into one, or as the Guardian put it

Investigation into Edward Heath child abuse claims to go national - Guardian

Featured several paragraphs down the story :

The Metropolitan police do not have an ongoing investigation into allegations of abuse by Heath. The force said it had interviewed a complainant in April who alleged in the Mirror newspaper this week that he was raped by Heath as a 12-year-old boy.
But the force said that, after making a full assessment, there were no lines of inquiry that could “proportionately” be pursued. The force has refused to confirm whether Heath features in Operation Midland – its ongoing investigation into claims that three murders were carried out to cover up abuse by a paedophile ring made up of politicians and other high-profile individuals at locations across southern England.

This contradicts elements of the Mirror story which stated that there was an ongoing investigation of the allegation it described. However this is quite separate from any allegations about Heath being dealt with by Operation Midland which this weeks Exaro story refers to.
 
That weirdo has been right so many times now it's unsettling

No reason to be unsettled. Part of his work involves reheating old rumours and adding his spin. I won't give him much credit for that, and there were certainly plenty of historical rumours to choose from on the sex abuse front.

Aside from whatever happens in regards bringing people to justice, inquiries etc, one of the things thats steadily been happening post-Savile is better mainstream acknowledgement of the rumours. Perhaps we'll even get to find out whether some of them were true. Icke can never have been truly right about them in my book because he delivered them as if they were proven facts. Such sloppiness doesn't get a special award from me in the event that further detailed investigation later proves some of them.
 
Back
Top Bottom