Why would Wiltshire make that up?I'm not catching your drift.
Why would Wiltshire make that up?
Not obvious to me that it's necessarily about making stuff up as opposed to covering arse. Conceivably because they have no records showing what happened one way or the other. I'm more interested in why the IPCC have taken it on.Why would Wiltshire make that up?
Well they said this..Nope, still not following you. Are you mixing up what Wiltshire police have said recently with what the former officer alleged?
“Sir Edward Heath has been named in relation to offences concerning children. He lived in Salisbury for many years and we would like to hear from anyone who has any relevant information that may assist us in our enquiries or anyone who believes they may have been a victim.
...It makes one wonder why other police forces are suddenly leaping to it...
Well they said this..
Are you suggesting that the naming went beyond Myra Forde's allegations?
Really ? If we have to have multiple investigations they might at least communicate with one another.And what happens to any particular branch of investigation into him shouldn't affect the others.
Really ? If we have to have multiple investigations they might at least communicate with one another.
Ah, I see what you mean. I entirely agree.I should have been more specific. This thread sometimes features suspicions that stinky branches may be introduced in order to scupper things. I don't think it works like that, and I'm really quite bored of all the cloak and dagger bollocks.
Well, I'm sorry if my comment about how 'smelly' this story is has added to your frustration; that was not my intent.When I say bored, I probably mean frustrated. Because there is a lot of dodgy shit that actually happened, but quite a part of discovering what actually happened involves eliminating the bogus stories. So when people come up with a bunch of fresh intrigue every single step of the way, increasingly muddy waters frustrate me.
Former PM as paedo really is pretty big, isn't it?
Well, I'm sorry if my comment about how 'smelly' this story is has added to your frustration; that was not my intent.
But the way this story about Heath has emerged has all the hallmarks of an attempt at a highly choreographed example of news management. To my untrained eye it looks as though the authorities have thought long and hard about how to break this to the public.
It appears tonight that they've already moved to a national investigation, and this story seems to have grown very quickly. I suspect that the brothel-owner/retired plod story was seem as a convenient way to break the news relatively gently, but perhaps they didn't reckon on Forde blowing their story.
Former PM as paedo really is pretty big, isn't it? This is the sort of stuff that Icke & co. were on about years ago.
“On the day of her trial there was a large number of reporters at the court,” he said. “I was informed by the police that this was because the defendant, who had been on bail, had let it be known that if the case progressed as far as her having to give evidence she intended to allege that she had provided rent boys to Edward Heath.”
Seed said there was no suggestion the men were under age or “anything more than male prostitutes” and furthermore these were “unsubstantiated assertions”.
“The decision for the case to proceed no further was mine and was based on the lack of evidence and had nothing whatsoever to do with any potential allegations against Edward Heath.”
In a letter to the Times, Seed said three witnesses, all prostitutes who allegedly worked for Forde at her brothel in Salisbury, Wiltshire, failed or refused to give evidence at court, leaving him with no choice but to offer no evidence.
So now the prosecutor at the time for the abandoned Forde case provides a third version of events:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...e-was-dropped-over-lack-of-evidence-barrister
contrasting events? contrasting accounts?My suspicion is that these conflicting events have little to do with noncery, and everything to do with competing interests trying to ward off action for professional misconduct. I would read her lawyer's denial in that context. Were he not a lawyer, I would be more terse and precise.
contrasting events? contrasting accounts?
you have to be quick to get one by meCorrected while you were typing
The Metropolitan police do not have an ongoing investigation into allegations of abuse by Heath. The force said it had interviewed a complainant in April who alleged in the Mirror newspaper this week that he was raped by Heath as a 12-year-old boy.
But the force said that, after making a full assessment, there were no lines of inquiry that could “proportionately” be pursued. The force has refused to confirm whether Heath features in Operation Midland – its ongoing investigation into claims that three murders were carried out to cover up abuse by a paedophile ring made up of politicians and other high-profile individuals at locations across southern England.
Former PM as paedo really is pretty big, isn't it? This is the sort of stuff that Icke & co. were on about years ago.
That weirdo has been right so many times now it's unsettling