http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28203914Baroness Butler-Sloss's broader, independent inquiry, will look at how seriously public bodies and other important institutions have taken their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse.
...
Mr Sedwill said Lady Butler-Sloss's inquiry would not be pursing individual cases, although she would want to hear cases of that type.
...
Her report on child sex abuse in Cleveland during the 1980s - which had led to more than 100 children being removed from their families - resulted in the Children's Act 1989.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28203914As part of a two-pronged attack on child abuse, Home Secretary Theresa May announced on Monday a separate review, headed by the NSPCC's Peter Wanless, which would focus on concerns the Home Office failed to act on allegations of child sex abuse contained in a dossier handed over in the 1980s by former Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.
Not all of them.
Chris Fay said he was pinned to a wall and throttled before being given a chilling warning to “back away” from allegations surrounding the notorious Elm Guest House in Barnes, south-west London.
Young boys in care were allegedly taken there in the Eighties to be abused by high-profile MPs and other powerful establishment figures.
Mr Fay, who worked for the now-defunct National Association of Young People In Care, accused the Metropolitan Police of acting like “gangsters” when news of the scandal broke in 1990. He revealed how some Special Branch members routinely threatened him and his colleagues and even victims over a three-month period of intimidation
To give Hodge her due, she's not kept her gob shut on the stuff that's arisen post-Savile, even though she must be painfully aware that the meeja are just waiting to trot out her past.
Retired judges are quite often used for inquiries. Provided she still has all her faculties, there is no reason why EB-S shouldn't do a perfectly good job, at least as far as her age is concerned: her experience as a lawyer will be useful in examining evidence (assuming there is any) and questioning witnesses.
Butler-Sloss knows an establishment cover-up when she sees one
The ‘establishment’ have decided to respond to allegations of an ‘establishment’ cover-up of the wholesale abuse of children by ‘establishment’ figures, by installing an ‘establishment’ figure to investigate them…. Dame Butler-Sloss will lead a review into whether “public bodies had failed in their duty of care towards children.”
Whether there is any significance in the fact that Dame Butler-Sloss’ brother was the Attorney General who decided not to prosecute Peter Hayman, the Paedophile diplomat, exposed by Geoffrey Dickens MP, is open for debate. However, in the interests of 100% transparency, only an idiot would make such an appointment, knowing the questions that would likely be raised.
The family connection is no coincidence. It just sheds further light on the horrible, grubby nepotism that exists within the judiciary and wider ruling elite….
http://winterofmalcontent.wordpress...-an-establishment-cover-up-when-she-sees-one/
So the first and second reviews both focus mainly on institutions, rather than perpetrators. I suppose police investigations are ongoing, but they don't seem to be ongoing very quickly, these allegations are many years old.
<snip>
I was surprised when the Police stated a few years ago such films were a myth, how could they say that ?
Well, I imagine what will happen is:I’m not saying that won’t happen.
Just that the line that they knew nothing or that “we’ve lost them, they got shredded, the dog eat them” or any other similar tripe simply won’t wash anymore with an increasing sceptical public who will no longer uncritically swallow anything the Government says in the way they would, say, 40 years ago.
One possible interpretation is that 'snuff film' is often taken to imply something made primarily for commercial gain, where the very few actual cases of filmed sex murders are more like 'sex killer home movies' ie more in the nature of a trophy than a commercial thing.
A more careful version of that classic police line, which would also have been used at the time and I'm sure I heard in at least one documentary from the late 80's or early 90's, is that 'the snuff movie(s) may exist, but we've not seen one and until we do we'll have to treat it as an unsubstantiated rumour'.
A more careful version of that classic police line, which would also have been used at the time and I'm sure I heard in at least one documentary from the late 80's or early 90's, is that 'the snuff movie(s) may exist, but we've not seen one and until we do we'll have to treat it as an unsubstantiated rumour'.
So frightening, what really goes on...
My faith in police investigations snaring some high-profile perpetrators has diminished somewhat over time, but thats not just because of how long its taking, but rather the way the mood of Exaro news pieces has changed over time.
Sure but as far as I know (and I'm willing to be educated here), even if you include sex killer verite (but exclude stuff like the 911 footage) there are only about half a dozen documented cases that didn't turn out to be sfx fakes, run of the mill Japanese porn or various sorts of myths (e.g. every case of the many mentioned during the Satanic Panics). So given the number of actual occurences vs myths, I don't think it's unreasonable to treat any claim of snuff movies as unsubstaniated until you've got a case that'll stand up in court.
It has to be out there, the fact now adays everyone has a phone camera means its inevitable.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/47...to-track-down-victim-of-child-porn-snuff-film
It's undead, however many times it's knocked on the head it always pops back up.
That list has been around for a while. Thing is note the MI 5 names on there, and the name of Leon Brittan. It's hardly likely that the dossier given to Brittan ever went anywhere than the bin, and MI5 are not going to drop their own in the shit. Expect a cover up!http://thefreedomagenda.wordpress.c...-child-sex-abuse-network-leads-back-to-no-10/
I don't know how reliable this list is but it's a list
Another thing I think we need, especially when considering the potential for continued abuses today, is for society to have a whole bunch of frank discussions about 'rent boys'. But we actually seem to get less of this these days than we did back when it was 'mainstream acceptable' to spout a load of awful shit about homosexuality, gender issues, etc.
Just came across this :
Police did nothing to track down victim of child porn snuff film
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/47...to-track-down-victim-of-child-porn-snuff-film
That list has been around for a while. Thing is note the MI 5 names on there, and the name of Leon Brittan. It's hardly likely that the dossier given to Brittan ever went anywhere than the bin, and MI5 are not going to drop their own in the shit. Expect a cover up!
I was thinking just the same. I wonder how long that list has been online.I'm surprised none of these names come out fighting McAlpine stylee as their reputations are being chipped away with innuendo and if they are totally innocent or unconnected have nothing to lose. Peter Bottomeley was quick out of the traps.