Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

I'm surprised none of these names come out fighting McAlpine stylee as their reputations are being chipped away with innuendo and if they are totally innocent or unconnected have nothing to lose. Peter Bottomeley was quick out of the traps.


Leon Brittan never sued when Private eye first made the allegation in the 80s.
 
Cover up without doubt on the way.
All blame will be laid at the door of some long deceased scumbucket.
All will be well in the island of Angels, we can all sleep a little less soundly in our beds tonight.:(

Peter Morrison - noted pederast will do nicely - I used to work in the Department of Energy when he was minister - he was always pissed and surrounded by blue eyed blonde young men in his Private Office.
 
I'm surprised none of these names come out fighting McAlpine stylee as their reputations are being chipped away with innuendo and if they are totally innocent or unconnected have nothing to lose. Peter Bottomeley was quick out of the traps.

One of the more famous names on the list is using the EU right to be forgotten ruling to remove some of the gossip about him, I've been comparing Google search results with those obtained via a US proxy where the ruling doesn't apply. So they are obviously concerned about this stuff but don't want to take it to court. :hmm:
 
One of the more famous names on the list is using the EU right to be forgotten ruling to remove some of the gossip about him, I've been comparing Google search results with those obtained via a US proxy where the ruling doesn't apply. So they are obviously concerned about this stuff but don't want to take it to court. :hmm:

Fighting a losing battle methinks - rather like Brazil - truth will out.
 
Yes, probably, i recall that mary moss worked closely with chris fay in exposing this stuff and was, i believe, the source of the list

more of her documents here *removed*
 
Last edited:
umm

or about prostitution and /or under-age prostitution in general? (I assume the latter exists with both genders) - and I'm not sure that a "rent boy" is necessarily under age, even now. it's also worth bearing in mind that until the mid 90s, a 20 year old was 'under age' as regards gay male sexual activity.

Certainly all of that stuff too. And I wasn't trying to imply that rent boy = under age. The changing laws regarding age of consent for gay male sexual activity is certainly a complication which can come up quite a bit when dealing with the specific subset of 'rent boy' stuff which I was getting at.

Specifically, the number of cases we have either heard about in the mainstream media (the original North Wales care home stuff that grabbed most of the attention initially) or via longstanding rumours. And the abuse-related vectors that put some people on that path. And any changes that have occurred both specifically to that stuff and more generally regarding male prostitution since the eras the historical allegations encompass.

To give just one very small and specific example, I don't think I've got that much idea exactly how old the boys that Peter Morrison was involved with were, or how such things would be treated today.

More broadly, societies failure to routinely and frankly discuss wider issues relating to age of consent and sex workers with a sustained clarity and depth, makes it even harder to have more specific discussions. The foundations for this discussion are weak and don't seem to be able to sustain a heavier conversation without repeated risk of collapse into one or another horrible mess. Including when people like me try to bring it up without using so many words as to ensure the subject is done justice and I don't come across as having some kinds of dodgy attitude towards either matters of sexuality or sex work.
 
that list (obviously I'm not commenting on the credibility or otherwise thereof) has been floating around the interweb for months if not a year or more. i'm not sure who floated it first
 
:eek: is it?
Well i don't read it, it just came up in google. Honestly.
The pictures are interesting but I will take down the link as I wouldn't want to increase their traffic and I'm sure they can be found elsewhere.
It's also hard to make much out in the pictures
 
Just search the thread for NAYPIC if you want my often-repeated description of the list, in terms of who made it, what it is and isn't.

One thing I probably haven't said umpteen times before is that I would not be at all surprised if certain journalists had been shown that list at various times over the decades since it was compiled. Certain historical press reports certainly suggest a strikingly similar list of alleged abusers were mentioned back in the day, although only the already disgraced or deceased were mentioned by name rather than vaguer descriptions of their position in society.
 
And as noted above the alleged list is very old and frequently posted - usually in very dodgy places.
Well for me, as I have been completely ignorant of the supposed identities it was surprising. Is it not credible then?
I'll remove the link if you lot think it muddies the waters or is not credible.
 
Express stories should set alarm bells ringing - the plot line and American accent suggest a fake snuff film - Charlie Sheen I seem to remember was taken in by the sick Japanese Guinea Pig films which are sfx and gruesome and loathsome.
Sheen contacted the FBI who eventually turned up on the doorstep of the late Chas Balun. When they explained why they were there he asked them if they had watched the end of the tape. It contained a 'making of' documentary showing how the special effects had been done.
 
:eek: is it?
Well i don't read it, it just came up in google. Honestly.
The pictures are interesting but I will take down the link as I wouldn't want to increase their traffic and I'm sure they can be found elsewhere.
It's also hard to make much out in the pictures

I guessed it was at the first mention of "jews" which is in the first sentence.
 
Well for me, as I have been completely ignorant of the supposed identities it was surprising. Is it not credible then?
I'll remove the link if you lot think it muddies the waters or is not credible.

As elbows posted just on Sunday:

elbows said:
It's one of the documents from NAYPIC that I often go on about. It was from a bunch of notes that the charity made back in the day when it was talking to some victims and the female manager of the guest house (who subsequently died). It, and a lot of other, less interesting, documents from the same source were crudely photographed and released onto the net, if memory serves me correctly approximately 18 months ago. The police subsequently took away the files as part of their Fernbridge/Fairbanks investigation, files which had been sitting in a shed for a couple of decades. Files that were being looked after by a woman from NAYPIC who does not trust the police and, according to some parts of her historical internet footprint, sometimes suffers from some problems of the mind (e.g. thinks she is related to royalty).

That page is certainly one of the major sources of fuel for the persistent, but rather sloppy and on legally dodgy ground, twitter and broader internet mini shitstorm thats been going for quite some time now.

I'm pretty sure that even Chris Faye, who worked for NAYPIC back in the day, characterised the documents as being a starting point for proper investigation, not some cast iron smoking gun thing. For example I don't think its in dispute that Elm Guest House was a gay brothel, and evidence of attendance is not, on its own, evidence of child abuse.
 
Well for me, as I have been completely ignorant of the supposed identities it was surprising. Is it not credible then?
I'll remove the link if you lot think it muddies the waters or is not credible.

I'm pretty sure it's been linked to on this thread a few times. Maybe from that site, maybe from others.

it's not entirely helpful that some of the sites making much of this whole issue are also virulently homophobic and / or anti-semitic and trying to make the story fit their shitty agendas.
 
I'm pretty sure it's been linked to on this thread a few times. Maybe from that site, maybe from others.
I'm sorry then to be raking over old ground. I've not read the whole thread, I believe I read a few pages at the very beginning and my response was that of mind boggled disbelief.So I stopped reading. It was not until yesterday that I truly paid attention to all of this so I hope you will excuse me and my internet naivety.
 
I'm pretty sure it's been linked to on this thread a few times. Maybe from that site, maybe from others.

it's not entirely helpful that some of the sites making much of this whole issue are also virulently homophobic and / or anti-semitic and trying to make the story fit their shitty agendas.

Or your common or garden conspiraloons ...
 
The list is certainly interesting (although not much background info) but the website it is on seems a little less credible.


The most interesting name on the list is "Gary Walker, " aka Sean O Callaghan an IRA/MI5 informer.

The list comes from the evidence in this video. From Chris Fay, former head of the nat assoc of young people in care and evidence he got from the woman who owned the Elms b and b.

 
wasn't there some story about when he was staying with ruth dudley edwards about sexual shenanigans?


Correct he went to a pub In Earls court, picked up a rent boy, brought him home, got tied up and robbed. Claimed it was all innocent.

The fact he is named by his MI5 codename shows the list could be authentic.
 
Regardless of how true the list is, it will be interesting to see if the announcement of inquiries emboldens other sites to repeat it. What happens after that will be even more interesting. Will any of the (living) people named do a Lord McAlpine, or will it spread? Can't see the mainstream media printing it in full to be honest, but there might be a few indirect references.
 
Back
Top Bottom