Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Griffin and BNP strategy

No - that's wrong. It's a question I am refusing to answer cos it is crap. There are far other and better ideas and lines of argument than that. It is seriously shite.

Is it crap cos you hold an "ultra-left" anarchist position that opposes voting, or for another reason?

anyway, seriously, why do you think it's crap?

i would have thought that if you were part of a left that did contest elections, or support left groups that stood in elections, then this was a reasonable Q. Would you like to have the success that the BNP have managed to accrue? I can think of a few reasons why you might think it an irrelevant Q, but what are your's?
 
I just think it's hypocritical to claim the BNP are doing poorly, whilst accepting that the left would love to get the results the BNP keep achieving, consistently.
 
What about to 'the BNP are an irritating but not doing much beyond existing crowd'? That is the sort of middle position between your 2 extremes - 'the BNP are doing supa yah'! and the BNP collapsing posse...

Incidentally that is where my opinion lies - between the ultra left on one side (IWCA/Butchers arse) and the Searchlight clan on the other. It is part of the area of autonomy:)
 
Incidentally that is where my opinion lies - between the ultra left on one side (IWCA/Butchers arse) and the Searchlight clan on the other. It is part of the area of autonomy:)




Unfortunately, the area of autonomy is located in an obscure corner of the universe.
 
Incidentally that is where my opinion lies - between the ultra left on one side (IWCA/Butchers arse) and the Searchlight clan on the other. It is part of the area of autonomy:)

Au contraire - that is the large middle ground where most people are:) You ultra left freaks are the ones on your own.:p

If most people agree with you, Brig, the sooner you stand for election the better! Don't bother waiting for Dave Douglas or anyone else to change his mind. You are the man of the hour, the people's tribune.
 
This is bad news for the BNP and good news for anti fascists everywhere:D:cool: It shows how thoroughly offensive and Nazi many of them openly are...

From the Socialist Unity site;

On a more personal note, I was pleased to see that in my neck of the woods, BNP Wiltshire organizer, Mike Howsman, was soundly thrashed in Corsham Ward for Corsham Town Council. The BNP won a set in Corsham last year because their candidate stood unopposed. Their poor result in this election undermines the credibility of their existing councillor, Michael Simkins.

Incidently, Mike Howsman is a nasty character. The Bath Chronicle exposed how his bebo account (like MySpace) had links to white supremacist sites (even ones prominently displaying swastikas), but most of the people linking to his site were between 16 and 20 years of age, and whom Howsman had built up links with through infiltrating the Air Cadet Corps.

Corsham Town Council, Wilts.
Lib-Dem – 676 (40.6%)
Con – 399 (24.0%)
Ind – 172 (10.3%)
Ind – 147 (8.8%)
BNP - 119 (7.3%)
 
Been looking at the numbers from the May local election results to see what's behind the national vote. Looking at England alone (London excluded as well) they had 343 seats where their vote was over 10%, the majority of them 15%+, and 82 seats in which they came 2nd. Here's the city/town %s in those areas where they've either had past success or stood large slates.

Barnsley - (21 seats contested) average vote across city = 17.36%
Calderdale (9) AV = 16%
Kirkless (20) 14.3%
Leeds (34) 11.2%
Rotherman (5) 27.9%
Wakefield (12) 20.48%
Basildon (14) 14.6%
Broxbourne (12) 15.35%
Epping Forest Loughton (14) 15%
Epping Forest DC (12) 15.5%
Thurrock (19) 21.7%
Southend (17) 10%
Brum (40) 7.5%
Stoke (11) 25.9%
Coventry (13) 11.2%
Dudely (11) 14.5%
Sandwell (12) 17.26%
Nuneanton and Bedworth (12) 20.77%
Solihull (12) 13.47%
Amber valley (7) 26.25%
Lincoln (5) 12.14%
Burnley (11) 21.89%
Bury (8) 11.11%
Carlisle (5) 16.3%
Liverpool (11) 9%
Oldham (5) 16.8%
Pendle (7) 30.43%
Salford (9) 12.48%
St Helens (5) 8.5%
Tameside (8) 21.75%
Wigan (7) 11.2%
Stockport (6) 10.5%)
Sunderland (25) 10.97%
Durham (30) 10.48%
Newcastle (12) 11.37%
South Tyneside (13) 13.18%
North Tyneside (5) 11.56%
Gateshead (12) 11.8%

It should be remembered that these seats are ones they they were returing to after the 2004 breakthrough - this would tell us whether we were seeing a simple BNP protest vote that would melt away once it was realised how inept the BNP were, or if we were seeing some genuine roots being laid down.
 
Been looking at the numbers from the May local election results to see what's behind the national vote. Looking at England alone (London excluded as well) they had 343 seats where their vote was over 10%, the majority of them 15%+, and 82 seats in which they came 2nd. Here's the city/town %s in those areas where they've either had past success or stood large slates.

Barnsley - (21 seats contested) average vote across city = 17.36%
Calderdale (9) AV = 16%
Kirkless (20) 14.3%
Leeds (34) 11.2%
Rotherman (5) 27.9%
Wakefield (12) 20.48%
Basildon (14) 14.6%
Broxbourne (12) 15.35%
Epping Forest Loughton (14) 15%
Epping Forest DC (12) 15.5%
Thurrock (19) 21.7%
Southend (17) 10%
Brum (40) 7.5%
Stoke (11) 25.9%
Coventry (13) 11.2%
Dudely (11) 14.5%
Sandwell (12) 17.26%
Nuneanton and Bedworth (12) 20.77%
Solihull (12) 13.47%
Amber valley (7) 26.25%
Lincoln (5) 12.14%
Burnley (11) 21.89%
Bury (8) 11.11%
Carlisle (5) 16.3%
Liverpool (11) 9%
Oldham (5) 16.8%
Pendle (7) 30.43%
Salford (9) 12.48%
St Helens (5) 8.5%
Tameside (8) 21.75%
Wigan (7) 11.2%
Stockport (6) 10.5%)
Sunderland (25) 10.97%
Durham (30) 10.48%
Newcastle (12) 11.37%
South Tyneside (13) 13.18%
North Tyneside (5) 11.56%
Gateshead (12) 11.8%

It should be remembered that these seats are ones they they were returing to after the 2004 breakthrough - this would tell us whether we were seeing a simple BNP protest vote that would melt away once it was realised how inept the BNP were, or if we were seeing some genuine roots being laid down.

SO you are saying that there are no BNP genuine social roots being put down.

Also I am not sure about the inclusion of Liverpool in your list - 11 is not a large slate out of 60 odd, and 9% is not a high vote. So on your own terms its curious.
 
They're close to death butchers.

U need to keep up - I have said I'm not in the 'BNP are dead camp'. I am asking you to define your terms - which is basic politics and should not be difficult at all. However, for you fools it appears that it is.

Eg. - for comparison how many seats did labour have with their vote over 10%? And how many where they came 2nd? THousands I imagine - Butchers is producing stats with NOTHING for comparison which is 'reality lite' sociology and politics. Have you heard the phrase 'Pop sociology' - well that is what Butchers produces - it is next to worthless.:eek:
 
U need to keep up - I have said I'm not in the 'BNP are dead camp'. I am asking you to define your terms - which is basic politics and should not be difficult at all. However, for you fools it appears that it is.

Eg. - for comparison how many seats did labour have with their vote over 10%? And how many where they came 2nd? THousands I imagine - Butchers is producing stats with NOTHING for comparison which is 'reality lite' sociology and politics. Have you heard the phrase 'Pop sociology' - well that is what Butchers produces - it is next to worthless.:eek:

The comparison is with their past performance.

Louis MacNeice
 
DOh! It has to be next to it (or linked) or it is worthless. It is no good saying 'it exists', honest.

Originally posted by BA:

"Been looking at the numbers from the May local election results to see what's behind the national vote. Looking at England alone (London excluded as well) they had 343 seats where their vote was over 10%, the majority of them 15%+, and 82 seats in which they came 2nd. Here's the city/town %s in those areas where they've either had past success or stood large slates.

Barnsley - (21 seats contested) average vote across city = 17.36%
Calderdale (9) AV = 16%
Kirkless (20) 14.3%
Leeds (34) 11.2%
Rotherman (5) 27.9%
Wakefield (12) 20.48%
Basildon (14) 14.6%
Broxbourne (12) 15.35%
Epping Forest Loughton (14) 15%
Epping Forest DC (12) 15.5%
Thurrock (19) 21.7%
Southend (17) 10%
Brum (40) 7.5%
Stoke (11) 25.9%
Coventry (13) 11.2%
Dudely (11) 14.5%
Sandwell (12) 17.26%
Nuneanton and Bedworth (12) 20.77%
Solihull (12) 13.47%
Amber valley (7) 26.25%
Lincoln (5) 12.14%
Burnley (11) 21.89%
Bury (8) 11.11%
Carlisle (5) 16.3%
Liverpool (11) 9%
Oldham (5) 16.8%
Pendle (7) 30.43%
Salford (9) 12.48%
St Helens (5) 8.5%
Tameside (8) 21.75%
Wigan (7) 11.2%
Stockport (6) 10.5%)
Sunderland (25) 10.97%
Durham (30) 10.48%
Newcastle (12) 11.37%
South Tyneside (13) 13.18%
North Tyneside (5) 11.56%
Gateshead (12) 11.8%

It should be remembered that these seats are ones they they were returing to after the 2004 breakthrough - this would tell us whether we were seeing a simple BNP protest vote that would melt away once it was realised how inept the BNP were, or if we were seeing some genuine roots being laid down."

Louis MacNeice
 
The first question is do the votes cast represent reasonable levels of support; I'd argue that they do for a small extremist party. The second question is do these result show some evidence of resiliance; given that they are results from areas previously contested again I'd say they do. Taking this view it would seem that BNP's fortunes are waxing rather than waning. Of itself this is concerning. As an indicator of other political challenges facing the us (including but not exclusively the failure of the left to garner support) it is no less worrying.

Louis MacNeice
 
BNP round up
by butchersapron on Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:44 am

3) Kirklees, Dalton ward

Labour McBride, Peter Daniel 1397 Held
LIBDEM Liberal Democrat Munro, Alison Louise 1155
CON Conservative Leonard, Martin James 605
BNP British National Party Wright, Jonathan David Baxter 157
GRN Green Hargreaves, David William 103
IND Independent Walder, Colin Anthony 34

Bad result for them, down abiout 400 votes, drop in turnout but still bad.


Attica writes -

For the observant among you - you may want to know the % drop in BNP vote - here it is;

71.813285%

That is the % collapse of the irrelevant, lost and never coming back in one of their so-called 'growth areas':D







PS - % calculated on the stats in front of me/you. 'about 400' added to 157 = 557, and the drop to 157 = a % difference between the 2 figures of 71.813285%.
 
Back
Top Bottom