I am going to take that as a "yes" attica.
No - that's wrong. It's a question I am refusing to answer cos it is crap. There are far other and better ideas and lines of argument than that. It is seriously shite.
What about to 'the BNP are an irritating but not doing much beyond existing crowd'? That is the sort of middle position between your 2 extremes - 'the BNP are doing supa yah'! and the BNP collapsing posse...
Incidentally that is where my opinion lies - between the ultra left on one side (IWCA/Butchers arse) and the Searchlight clan on the other. It is part of the area of autonomy
Unfortunately, the area of autonomy is located in an obscure corner of the universe.
Au contraire - that is the large middle ground where most people are
I will remind people of this when I go to the pub later.
To make a comparison, one that might lead to some critical self-reflexion on the part of the BNP is dead/dying crowd. But no, blunder onwards.
Would you be happy if the left start polling those results?
Incidentally that is where my opinion lies - between the ultra left on one side (IWCA/Butchers arse) and the Searchlight clan on the other. It is part of the area of autonomy
Au contraire - that is the large middle ground where most people are You ultra left freaks are the ones on your own.
Being 'happy' about some electoral gain is 'politics for dummy's'.
If most people agree with you, Brig, the sooner you stand for election the better! Don't bother waiting for Dave Douglas or anyone else to change his mind. You are the man of the hour, the people's tribune.
You're an anti-electoral anarchist now
It was yesterday.
Been looking at the numbers from the May local election results to see what's behind the national vote. Looking at England alone (London excluded as well) they had 343 seats where their vote was over 10%, the majority of them 15%+, and 82 seats in which they came 2nd. Here's the city/town %s in those areas where they've either had past success or stood large slates.
Barnsley - (21 seats contested) average vote across city = 17.36%
Calderdale (9) AV = 16%
Kirkless (20) 14.3%
Leeds (34) 11.2%
Rotherman (5) 27.9%
Wakefield (12) 20.48%
Basildon (14) 14.6%
Broxbourne (12) 15.35%
Epping Forest Loughton (14) 15%
Epping Forest DC (12) 15.5%
Thurrock (19) 21.7%
Southend (17) 10%
Brum (40) 7.5%
Stoke (11) 25.9%
Coventry (13) 11.2%
Dudely (11) 14.5%
Sandwell (12) 17.26%
Nuneanton and Bedworth (12) 20.77%
Solihull (12) 13.47%
Amber valley (7) 26.25%
Lincoln (5) 12.14%
Burnley (11) 21.89%
Bury (8) 11.11%
Carlisle (5) 16.3%
Liverpool (11) 9%
Oldham (5) 16.8%
Pendle (7) 30.43%
Salford (9) 12.48%
St Helens (5) 8.5%
Tameside (8) 21.75%
Wigan (7) 11.2%
Stockport (6) 10.5%)
Sunderland (25) 10.97%
Durham (30) 10.48%
Newcastle (12) 11.37%
South Tyneside (13) 13.18%
North Tyneside (5) 11.56%
Gateshead (12) 11.8%
It should be remembered that these seats are ones they they were returing to after the 2004 breakthrough - this would tell us whether we were seeing a simple BNP protest vote that would melt away once it was realised how inept the BNP were, or if we were seeing some genuine roots being laid down.
they had 343 seats where their vote was over 10%, the majority of them 15%+, and 82 seats in which they came 2nd
They're close to death butchers.
U need to keep up - I have said I'm not in the 'BNP are dead camp'. I am asking you to define your terms - which is basic politics and should not be difficult at all. However, for you fools it appears that it is.
Eg. - for comparison how many seats did labour have with their vote over 10%? And how many where they came 2nd? THousands I imagine - Butchers is producing stats with NOTHING for comparison which is 'reality lite' sociology and politics. Have you heard the phrase 'Pop sociology' - well that is what Butchers produces - it is next to worthless.
The comparison is with their past performance.
Louis MacNeice
DOh! It has to be next to it (or linked) or it is worthless. It is no good saying 'it exists', honest.
DOh! It has to be next to it (or linked) or it is worthless. It is no good saying 'it exists', honest.