Some people may like having the last word--I don't, necessarily. The 2 posters above me gave links to Searchlight disinformation, on important matters: crisis (or otherwise) in the BNP, and the tall tales told by some 'reformed' fascists in Searchlight's orbit. Without questionong at all the sincerity and motives of those two posters, I really would be interested in some discussion on the rights/wrongs of these matters. Or failing that, at the very least an acknowledgement by the posters that, yes, there is an alternative point of view concerning these stories that may merit some examination, at least. Surely, on an internet discussion forum, that is a reasonable request on my part? I am well aware that Searchlight scum do not believe in debate, or allow it in their magazine--but I would hesitate before assuming such bad faith on the part of the above two posters I am referring to. If disinformation is peddled unchallemged, that only ensures repetition--Searchlight can get away with such falsehoods as they do precisely because people often uncritically see them as a 'neutral' information source. However, given their aspirations are monopolistic, surely even the most blinkered Last Century Leftist can understand that this whole area of fascism/anti-fascism/the media/the secret state, is one in which the secret state itself, in various dactions, has its own agendas. How much easier to pursue them, including the creation of false ;legends' for state assets, if the conversion stories of same are never subject to scrutiny, of the sort I have attempted in the articles mentioned above. Equally, as my seemingly flippant remark above about 'NSDAP in Crisis' alludes to, constantly crying wolf & underestimating the fascist enemy in fact aids fascists, because it divertd attention from examining and then targetting, their actual strengths & weaknesses. All very obvious really, and tedious to have to keep repeating such. But, to paraphrase Wellington, if the secret state & their sewage outlets keep coming on in the same old way, they need to be opposed in the same old way, at least. And finally, to those naive enough to sign up the the Searchlight 'shut down Redwatch' campaign, there is ample evidence in the public domain/online--including the entire Notes From the Borderland issue 2 article concerning Yorkshire--that Searchlight, including Lowles as well as Gable, and Searchlight/SB informant Tony White--are implicated in Redwatch Mark 2 as they were in Redwatch Mark 1. If you do not learn from history, then as Marx might have said, you are condemned to facilitate its repetition.
