frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Hang on a minute...
...the government is now saying the cladding believed to have been used is banned in the UK.
why the hell was it used then
Hang on a minute...
...the government is now saying the cladding believed to have been used is banned in the UK.
Maybe that was the wrong way to put it, but what I was getting at was that speculation about the final death toll and associated cover ups is creating a space for CT nonsense to breed.
I just had a look at his Twitter feed. I wished I hadn't. Retweeting similar stuff from Tommy Robinson. How is this lying piece of shit allowed to get away with this?
Heh yeah it's ok I know this already but what a proper scumbag, here on the other hand is an entirely different person.The world is an unfair place, where assholes have a disproportion amount of power. Sorry.
Don't get the obsession over the number of dead, or buy into any kind of theory that this is being deliberately suppressed (why? To what ends?). Don't think it leads to anywhere useful. The actual number of dead is 'too many', can we just stick to this?
Maybe that was the wrong way to put it, but what I was getting at was that speculation about the final death toll and associated cover ups is creating a space for CT nonsense to breed.
It is genuinely staggering quite how small some London Boroughs have actually shrunk the (local) state. My own borough (albeit a titchy one by GL standards) has an annual expenditure of £150m. (In a borough where the total estimated public sector expenditure is approx £2bn.) These neoliberal, consolidator entities hardly exist.Or possibly plain cluelessness (though that might be being generous to them)
Agreeing with you. Any number over zero is far too many.Don't get the obsession over the number of dead, or buy into any kind of theory that this is being deliberately suppressed (why? To what ends?). Don't think it leads to anywhere useful. The actual number of dead is 'too many', can we just stick to this?
A major blaze inside Grenfell Tower in 2010 was successfully contained, suggesting the building was safe before the flammable cladding was added;
you shouldn't really be posting vids put up by racistsA whole new strand of madness here.
A witness claiming that Muslims think that it was a revenge attack for London Bridge & Manchester. Let's hope that narrative doesn't take hold.
I suggest you wind your neck in, read the words I typed, consider what I said, and then write out your apology.
If that's beyond you, then I suggest you simply stroll on and don't bother dirtying up the thread with anything further on this particular side-issue.
There are a lot of crazy theories swirling about, I think not giving them air is probably best.A whole new strand of madness here.
.
Can't listen to this at the moment, so unclear on details.
Apparently they're being told they will be declared "intentionally homeless" if they refuse relocation outside of London?
Horrendous, contemptuous, and utterly disorganised treatment
Hammond has done two things today: said that it's banned, and also said that the government's response to Lakanal was sufficient. I dunno why he'd go out and buy a sword to fall on, but he's on it regardless.Hang on a minute...
...the government is now saying the cladding believed to have been used is banned in the UK.
Not bought but leasedHammond has done two things today: said that it's banned, and also said that the government's response to Lakanal was sufficient. I dunno why he'd go out and buy a sword to fall on, but he's on it regardless.
Thread. Quite powerful watching the appreciation of the community towards LFB. Although the Scientologists setting up a stall to prey on the vulnerable is extremely enraging.
Sorry, I hadn't really paid any attention to the channel it was on.you shouldn't really be posting vids put up by racists
Hammond has done two things today: said that it's banned, and also said that the government's response to Lakanal was sufficient. I dunno why he'd go out and buy a sword to fall on, but he's on it regardless.
Fair point. I'll edit.There are a lot of crazy theories swirling about, I think not giving them air is probably best.
Sorry, I hadn't really paid any attention to the channel it was on.
They are not attacks, they are warnings to be careful of your links and where they come from. Will you take any of that on board?? Will you learn?You are right, sorry. I should have limited my tirade to the manic posters who used your post to get on their high hobby horses and make attacks on me, again. I see your wording was not an attack.
yes, but Rax isn't a racist...Maybe you've got an agenda Oh well, let you off this time.
Snivelling shit. You've been let off loads of times and had it explained to you by many posters and still keep doing it. Corax takes the point, apologises and edits, do you do that? No you twist and wriggle trying to justify your sources. See the difference??Maybe you've got an agenda Oh well, let you off this time.
Has this been posted?
With Corax it's a mistake, with Anudder Oik it's deliberateSnivelling shit. You've been let off loads of times and had it explained to you by many posters and still keep doing it. Corax takes the point, apologises and edits, do you do that? No you twist and wriggle trying to justify your sources. See the difference??