Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Goldsmiths University Diversity officer facing sack

Should she be sacked?

  • Yes she should

    Votes: 71 53.4%
  • No she should not

    Votes: 32 24.1%
  • Official warning

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • Attention seeking option

    Votes: 23 17.3%

  • Total voters
    133
Framing it as 'trans-exclusionary' - and therefore bigoted - is surely problematic?
It's excluding trans people so it sounds descriptive to me. If the reason for exclusion is bigotry, then they're not really in a strong position to be upset by people calling them bigots. If it's not bigotry, then they need to provide credible evidence to support their trans exclusion.
 
It means, though, you aren't engaging with what people *in this thread* are saying or thinking at all. You are assuming them to be saying and thinking the crap you've heard in the past and re-engaging with that all over again instead, to the detriment of us all, yourself included.
engaging? you don't have a leg to stand on.
 
It's excluding trans people so it sounds descriptive to me. If the reason for exclusion is bigotry, then they're not really in a strong position to be upset by people calling them bigots. If it's not bigotry, then they need to provide credible evidence to support their trans exclusion.

I'm playing devils advocate here based on some views I've read. One problem is the concept of someone merely having to 'identify' as a woman' to be allowed into female only spaces of which there's a whole spectrum. So for all intents and purposes a man can rock up to a female only space, say he identifies as a woman and expect to be let in? If not, where is a line drawn on the trans spectrum?

The other argument was based on female oppression being based largely on their reproductive systems. Things that are unique to cis women.
 
It's not just a twitter storm now though. The person/people who have engineered this have co-opted the right wing press, 4chan, reddit, etc in an effort to blow it up out of all proportion, lose her job, have her investigated by the police and strip her of her degree. Whatever I think of her politics, the more I hear about what's happened and read it for myself, the stronger my support for her. The politics can wait.


Sorry she behaved idiotically then decided to double down on her idiocy then complains she's being bullied.
What the fuck did she expect?
The male tears cartoon was a call out turns put she can hand it out just cant take it.
 
I'm playing devils advocate here based on some views I've read. One problem is the concept of someone merely having to 'identify' as a woman' to be allowed into female only spaces of which there's a whole spectrum. So for all intents and purposes a man can rock up to a female only space, say he identifies as a woman and expect to be let in? If not, where is a line drawn on the trans spectrum?

The other argument was based on female oppression being based largely on their reproductive systems. Things that are unique to cis women.

Before we go any further with this "devil's advocate" position, can you just explain what you mean by merely identifying? And then also the reproductive system aspect - what's the significance with that?
 
Sorry she behaved idiotically then decided to double down on her idiocy then complains she's being bullied.
What the fuck did she expect?
The male tears cartoon was a call out turns put she can hand it out just cant take it.
You've said some really really really fucking stupid stuff on here eg about Muslims. Anyone hunted you down for it, tried to lose you your job, investigated by the police etc?
 
Before we go any further with this "devil's advocate" position, can you just explain what you mean by merely identifying? And then also the reproductive system aspect - what's the significance with that?

So you haven't even bothered to acquaint yourself with these positions prior to dismissing them as exclusionist?
 
And what about others including Thora who now appear to be silent in the debate as the bigot hammer cracks down?
I was called a bigot (misogynist) many, many times including in a widely distributed blog and given no right to reply. And all I wanted to do was argue from my personal gender identity and not on the assumption of some others that I was a man.
 
I was called a bigot (misogynist) many, many times including in a widely distributed blog and given no right to reply. And all I wanted to do was argue from my personal gender identity and not on the assumption of some others that I was a man.

I don't think anyone on here thinks you're a man. I don't.
 
Back
Top Bottom