Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Goldsmiths University Diversity officer facing sack

Should she be sacked?

  • Yes she should

    Votes: 71 53.4%
  • No she should not

    Votes: 32 24.1%
  • Official warning

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • Attention seeking option

    Votes: 23 17.3%

  • Total voters
    133
All them downvotes. It's probably doing the rounds in the MRA/Gamergate swamp.
ah of course - thats sad and makes me feel somewhat sorry for everyone involved (and being mocked)
To me student politics is a place to find yourself and cut your teeth a little, in the relatively safe space and small scale of the campus - whatever the rights and wrongs of this this isn't something that should be covered in national newspapers and shared hundreds of thousands of times on the internet.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why she's put herself in the sentence though. Women in general cannot be sexist towards men, and people from ethnic minorities cannot be racist towards the predominant ethnic group. But, like probably a great many other things, she only seems to be interested in this stuff as it pertains to her personally.

Also, 'not racist' does not necessarily mean 'not an idiot'.

She is very clear in that vid as to why she doesn't feel she can be 'racist or sexist'. 'Because racism and sexism describe structures of priviledge based on race and gender'.

Also, she obviously positioned herself in that sentence as the allegations are against her in particular.
 
Naive stupid and childish speech so simple that if she and her ilk were not serious, it would be perfect for a comedy sketch.
Yet again a prime example of how the capitalist system fukks up and confuses our brains.
 
‘It’s a way of reclaiming the power from the trauma many of us experience as queers, women, people of colour, who are on the receiving end of racism, misogyny and homophobia daily’, she said.

I don't buy this explanation either. The way to reclaim power for me is the opposite...not to internalise and start using the very same perjorative insults. IME working through/out trauma isn't best served by mimicking the very things/structures/insults that oppress in the first place.
 
Are you being deliberately obtuse? You said to pickman's that he couldn't make the judgement call regarding someone's colour of skin in defence of someone doing exactly that.
I wasn't defending her. I was criticising people for saying that someone who didn't identify as white was white.
[Pedant mode]deliberately obtuse is a tautology [/pedant mode]
 
One of her central arguments seems to be - because I am Turkic, I cannot be racist.

Pretty odd one when set against the Armenian genocide...

And then her wider point is that all ethnic minorities can never be racist, which is even more bizarre.
 
I'm sure some diversity officers swing the lead (and this one seems to be a penis), but are you really questioning the validity of a role for someone to provide advocacy and representation for minority groups within an institution?

I'm sure there is a role for it, I'm doubtful how often that role is actually useful and not just used to tick another box.

Better engagement with faculty and students would be better and cross cultural events appealing to both minorities and majorities would be good.
 
Back
Top Bottom