Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
diamond's fantasy world is the one in which he's respectedI think pandering to diamond's fantasy world is probably not the best idea, on reflection.
diamond's fantasy world is the one in which he's respectedI think pandering to diamond's fantasy world is probably not the best idea, on reflection.
As your sense of superiority clearly does. Don't you have a case to work on? You obviously have a lot to do...You're entitled to your opinion but it is wrong.
No doubt your sense of entitlement will provide a warm blanket by way of respite.
As your sense of superiority clearly does. Don't you have a case to work on? You obviously have a lot to do...
Pro bono work is a good thing, diamond misunderstanding the law around which his client's case will be argued, not so much.Why is everyone so negative and dismissive about Diamond doing pro bono work? That's a good thing to be doing surely?
i was watching s.1 ep.3 of the shield earlier in which there was a sticker on a door: "no solicitors"Solicitors in the UK. Lawyers are American.
and when you've finished that you could turn to the rather more daunting task of trying to build a case for yourself.I'm on my way home from watching the Gooners spank West Brom so I have time to swat away your weak repartee but, yes, when I arrive I will try and build a case for my client, if possible.
and when you've finished that you could turn to the rather more daunting task of trying to build a case for yourself.
He's probably going to interpret that as needing to present his case to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal some time soonand when you've finished that you could turn to the rather more daunting task of trying to build a case for yourself.
and when you've finished that you could turn to the rather more daunting task of trying to build a case for yourself.
not quite, as it turned out.He's probably going to interpret that as needing to present his case to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal some time soon
True.not quite, as it turned out.
Post of the week contender.That does not mean anything.
yes. it's this sort of slipshod shite which i - and i expect others - associate with you. there's none of the evidence of logical procedure in your contributions which i would expect from the trained legal mind, but a load of auld crap which the callowest newbie should be ashamed of.That does not mean anything.
i'm surprised they aren't on first name terms with him.He's probably going to interpret that as needing to present his case to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal some time soon
Maybe he's still in the taxi and didn't read it properly etcyes. it's this sort of slipshod shite which i - and i expect others - associate with you. there's none of the evidence of logical procedure in your contributions which i would expect from the trained legal mind, but a load of auld crap which the callowest newbie should be ashamed of.
maybe he did read it properly but couldn't comprehend it.Maybe he's still in the taxi and didn't read it properly etc
i'm surprised they aren't on first name terms with him.
Cards at Christmasi'm surprised they aren't on first name terms with him.
Or maybe he assumed you were being careless with your language.maybe he did read it properly but couldn't comprehend it.
yeh regular as clockwork they want to see him early in january for another transgressionCards at Christmas
unfortunately for a professional pedant, diamond doesn't understand things as well as he thinks he does.Or maybe he assumed you were being careless with your language.
As evidenced in the concurrent manslaughter/self defence thread. If only he were as avid in his defence of marginalised and excluded people to the extent of supporting them on this thread rather than latterly cynically using it as a vehicle for obtaining the necessary legal references without putting in the work required.unfortunately for a professional pedant, diamond doesn't understand things as well as he thinks he does.
perhaps if he read law books instead of just dusting them now and again he'd be in a position to offer an informed opinion.As evidenced in the concurrent manslaughter/self defence thread. If only he were as avid in his defence of marginalised and excluded people to the extent of supporting them on this thread rather than latterly cynically using it as a vehicle for obtaining the necessary legal references without putting in the work required.
I doubt he's got the green book to hand but google is his friend.perhaps if he read law books instead of just dusting them now and again he'd be in a position to offer an informed opinion.
i didn't know he was that way inclinedI doubt he's got the green book to hand but google is his friend.
I didn't mean that green booki didn't know he was that way inclined
the full text of this one readily available online tooI didn't mean that green book