And I don't see how my gender identity is at all political.
Ok - I have n fucking idea what you're on about then.
And I don't see how my gender identity is at all political.
Pro bono work is a good thing, diamond misunderstanding the law around which his client's case will be argued, not so much.
I prefer my lawyers to know what they're doing, pro bono or otherwise.
Why is everyone so negative and dismissive about Diamond doing pro bono work? That's a good thing to be doing surely?
it's that you whine about it, you drivel on about it, you fart about it. it's getting dull.Anyways, we know how averse the editor is to my talk of pro bono so how about we drop that now?
I was about to say that Diamond was possibly deliberately and successfully drawing fire from AuntiStella in an act of solidarity but I may have been mistaken.
how nice to find you, for once, lost for words.
it's that you whine about it, you drivel on about it, you fart about it. it's getting dull.
Benefit of the doubt together with ascribing you with laudable motivations.
every morning when i wake up i thank god i do not have to rely on your representation. and i pray for those who do.I don't do any of the above.
You, clearly, get fucked off about it.
Do I give a toss that a self-satisfied martinet like you gets wound up?
Yes, it's one of the highlights of the role...
every morning when i wake up i thank god i do not have to rely on your representation. and i pray for those who do.
if they have to rely on you, they'd better hope there's a deity out there somewhere to help them.You pray?
Tbh if the only problem people have with Diamond is that he says he does pro bono work (that's representing someone as a lawyer without charging right?) then I think the witch hunt could be called off. It's a good thing to be doing, and it's giving something back, and you might think he shouldn't mention it or boast about it (if he has) but if that's the most of peoples problem with him then this is pretty unpleasant mob stuff. I suspect it's just cos he's a lawyer full stop. And I dunno how justified that is?
Tbh if the only problem people have with Diamond is that he says he does pro bono work (that's representing someone as a lawyer without charging right?) then I think the witch hunt could be called off. It's a good thing to be doing, and it's giving something back, and you might think he shouldn't mention it or boast about it (if he has) but if that's the most of peoples problem with him then this is pretty unpleasant mob stuff. I suspect it's just cos he's a lawyer full stop. And I dunno how justified that is?
Solicitors in the UK. Lawyers are American.
It seems to me, in this thread at least (I'm not familiar with any other interactions) it's his work on anti-discrimination when he defends the right to cause offence that is the root of the ire.
Nah.
Solicitors here, attorneys there, lawyers everywhere.
Haven't you got work to do? Section 26 is your starting point.And bastards everywhere apparently...
Haven't you got work to do? Section 26 is your starting point.
You haven't talked to your client yet but you've already said it's a hopeless case? Blimey.The starting point is talking to my client not a book, but you probably wouldn't get that because you dont really get anything.
Which one is Bono?
You haven't talked to your client yet but you've already said it's a hopeless case? Blimey.
I have met her twice in person and she has two matters to address. One is dim, the other slightly brighter, but you follow your client's instructions nonetheless.
That's sort of how the whole law thing works.
But, let me guess, you have no idea what you are talking about...