Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Goldsmiths University Diversity officer facing sack

Should she be sacked?

  • Yes she should

    Votes: 71 53.4%
  • No she should not

    Votes: 32 24.1%
  • Official warning

    Votes: 7 5.3%
  • Attention seeking option

    Votes: 23 17.3%

  • Total voters
    133
And I don't see how my gender identity is at all political.

Gender is certainly a political issue. What takes the piss is that trans peoples experiences and sense of sex/gender and bodies are constantly held up for more deconstruction and criticism, whilst regularly asserted to be less valid ('real') than cis peoples - all the fucking time and to a degree which most cis people don't ever have to deal with. Trans women particularly then get exposed to daily cis-sexism too - wear jeans and hoody 'she's a man/not trying hard enough', wear a dress 'she's reinforcing patriarchal notions of feminity', dare to speak up and call cis people out 'that's male privilege/socialisation'.
 
Well this has all become a very cosy circle jerk in my brief absence.

Do carry on with your auto-stimulation folks, it's highly amusing.
 
Why is everyone so negative and dismissive about Diamond doing pro bono work? That's a good thing to be doing surely?

This bit mystifies me as well.

People seem to take much more personal offence to the fact that I work pro bono than if I insulted them directly.

Perhaps it's because they are lazy eejits who, deep down, know that they could and should be doing much more than sniping on a bulletin board but lack the motivation/conviction/talent/appetite to do anything else but mutter bad words from afar...
 
it's that you whine about it, you drivel on about it, you fart about it. it's getting dull.

I don't do any of the above.

You, clearly, get fucked off about it.

Do I give a toss that a self-satisfied martinet like you gets wound up?

Yes, it's one of the highlights of the role...
 
Tbh if the only problem people have with Diamond is that he says he does pro bono work (that's representing someone as a lawyer without charging right?) then I think the witch hunt could be called off. It's a good thing to be doing, and it's giving something back, and you might think he shouldn't mention it or boast about it (if he has) but if that's the most of peoples problem with him then this is pretty unpleasant mob stuff. I suspect it's just cos he's a lawyer full stop. And I dunno how justified that is?
 
Hart-Foundation.jpg
 
Tbh if the only problem people have with Diamond is that he says he does pro bono work (that's representing someone as a lawyer without charging right?) then I think the witch hunt could be called off. It's a good thing to be doing, and it's giving something back, and you might think he shouldn't mention it or boast about it (if he has) but if that's the most of peoples problem with him then this is pretty unpleasant mob stuff. I suspect it's just cos he's a lawyer full stop. And I dunno how justified that is?

It seems to me, in this thread at least (I'm not familiar with any other interactions) it's his work on anti-discrimination when he defends the right to cause offence that is the root of the ire.
 
Tbh if the only problem people have with Diamond is that he says he does pro bono work (that's representing someone as a lawyer without charging right?) then I think the witch hunt could be called off. It's a good thing to be doing, and it's giving something back, and you might think he shouldn't mention it or boast about it (if he has) but if that's the most of peoples problem with him then this is pretty unpleasant mob stuff. I suspect it's just cos he's a lawyer full stop. And I dunno how justified that is?

Don't worry about me.

I have a pretty thick skin and these muppets are many miles away from puncturing it.
 
It seems to me, in this thread at least (I'm not familiar with any other interactions) it's his work on anti-discrimination when he defends the right to cause offence that is the root of the ire.

That does not really make sense. Do you care to make it out more clearly?
 
You haven't talked to your client yet but you've already said it's a hopeless case? Blimey.

I have met her twice in person and she has two matters to address. One is dim, the other slightly brighter, but you follow your client's instructions nonetheless.

That's sort of how the whole law thing works.

But, let me guess, you have no idea what you are talking about...
 
Back
Top Bottom