Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you've got 2) wrong. we care about such things at urban and if you're not down the with the message then perhaps you're not as urban as we all thought.1) yes, 2) no.
you've got 2) wrong. we care about such things at urban and if you're not down the with the message then perhaps you're not as urban as we all thought.1) yes, 2) no.
1) depends 2) dependsCan't be arsed to read the thread - can someone please tell me 1) is she as big a Fucking idiot as she sounds and 2) should I give a fuck?
Thanks in advance.
I always forget that pesky asterisk
I'm more post punk than Goth
Anyway, on a serious note, this sort of thing is not identity politics. It's plastic sectarianism.
No. I dont give a shit about Bahar Mustafa. I do care about some people's response to her nonsense on here, which has been a bit dodgy. No intersectionalism involved.It is in this instance though, isn't it?
No. I dont give a shit about Bahar Mustafa. I do care about some people's response to her nonsense on here, which has been a bit dodgy. No intersectionalism involved.
Cis is just a word/shorthand to describe what isn't trans*. In itself it's no more privilege politics than "straight" is. It's pointless rejecting a useful word just because you don't like the context in which it's used by a few students.Why use the word 'cis' if it's got nothing to do with privilege politics?
Why use the word 'cis' if it's got nothing to do with privilege politics?
I haven't used the word 'cis'
Cis is just a word/shorthand to describe what isn't trans*. In itself it's no more privilege politics than "straight" is. It's pointless rejecting a useful word just because you don't like the context in which it's used by a few students.
Well if it's of any use to you, I haven't met anybody who describes themselves as cis.
It's only of any use to me in giving me an understanding of your personal experiences, unless you're suggesting that anything should be extrapolated from those?Well if it's of any use to you, I haven't met anybody who describes themselves as cis.
Everyone on the thread thinks she's a bellend. What do you think you're arguing about?I'm referring to the diversity officer. You know, the topic.
It shouldn't be hard to counter the ridiculous and divisive antics of Bahar Mustafa and her ilk with a sensible acknowledgement that there are varying types and degrees of minorities, exclusion and oppression - without a descent into opposing ridiculousness and divisiveness.
Everyone on the thread thinks she's a bellend. What do you think you're arguing about?
What did you think you were arguing about?
some people's response to her nonsense on here, which has been a bit dodgy.
It's only of any use to me in giving me an understanding of your personal experiences, unless you're suggesting that anything should be extrapolated from those?
That's not what I said. What I said was that (to paraphrase) your personal experience of never having met anyone that describes themselves as "Cis" is only useful to me as an indication of your personal experiences, not whether or not "Cis" is useful as a term.You wouldn't be able to understand my personal experiences without me giving myself a bunch of labels?
That's not what I said. What I said was that (to paraphrase) your personal experience of never having met anyone that describes themselves as "Cis" is only useful to me as an indication of your personal experiences, not whether or not "Cis" is useful as a term.
Think yourself lucky - I don't have to reach far into my memory when someone tries to exclude me from a space for being trans.Ah right. I'll store it in the memory bank should it be needed. Perhaps when Im auto banned from some space or another.
Have you ever been banned from a space, citizen? Apart from women-only afternoon at the swimming baths?