BandWagon
Life's a bitch and then you die...
That's a really nice link. I'm glad that the problem has been recognised and help is available.
That's a really nice link. I'm glad that the problem has been recognised and help is available.
It is all a a bit:That's a really nice link. I'm glad that the problem has been recognised and help is available.
Religion persists because it's pounded into people's heads when they're too young to think critically. If that stopped then it would die out. Trouble is, you can't stop it.Personally I am a deeply convinced agnostic and believe any and all religion should be strictly kept out of education, law or government - and yes, that includes Buddhists and yoga-mongers and 'mindfulness'-touters as well as fundamentalist Catholics/Prods/Jews/Muslims. Religion nearly always works to the detriment of women and the weakest in society so those are two other extremely compelling reasons to reject it altogether.
I was lucky enough to be brought up by atheists within a weakly Anglican environment so I got the cultural benefit of the "stories" (all that Bible-centric art, literature and philosophy) without suffering too much for not BELIEVING in any of it.
I'd love it if the rest of the world came around to my way of thinking But my principles are tested by many things. You could say I'm plagued by doubts ...
- if religion is so inherently illogical (if not stupid) then how come it hasn't died out already? why didn't the Enlightenment just call time on it and done?
- people are obviously capable of great kindness/great crimes regardless of their cultural context, but it is noticeable that even in societies where generation(s) were brought up without religion, or religion was even punished, as soon as the repression lifted, people (not all but many) drifted back to it. Why? is it simply that religions act like private therapy? make us feel more 'grounded' or more able to deal with our fate, which is otherwise too bleak or meaningless to accept? Or is it just that people like meeting up for tea, biscuits and singing and the social role of religion is what we are actually most keen on?
- regardless of its big "truth" issues, shouldn't we look at the thing the other way round - something like, we humans are too mentally weak and clannish and bonkers (with those possible "god spots" in the brain etc - design faults if ever I heard of them) to do without religion and that's why it spontaneously generates in all human societies thus far? that whether or not there's a god, or a jesus, or sin or seven hells or reincarnation, that humans inherently need some sort of belief system to reconcile their 'humane' feelings (about envy/justice/jealousy/violence) and the inhumane violence and scarcity of survival? is religion just a way to make life bearable until the interwebs come along?
i have evidence and understanding that leads me to know there will be a tomorrow. my chances of seeing it, is a matter of probability based on my understanding of causes of death in women of my age and health. None of this is faith.Which god. when, why?
You can have faith that there will be a tomorrow.
Maybe what he's saying is that if you believe in god and an afterlife, then even if you die tonight you will still see tomorrow.i have evidence and understanding that leads me to know there will be a tomorrow. my chances of seeing it, is a matter of probability based on my understanding of causes of death in women of my age and health. None of this is faith.
no gods. never. irrelevant and enormously unlikely.Which god. when, why?
Should jail the f******Probably not the right thread but:
The Scottish Catholic Church has apologies to abuse survivors!
Well that makes it all right then.
'I am married to Jesus': Consecrated virgin
Never trust anyone who says "What God meant to say is".
There is a good point here: which god?
There are dozens of religions, and within them, hundreds of sects. There are around 20 different islamic sects, I think, and I read somewhere that there are 30,000 christian sects. I don't know if that's true.
They can't all be right because they preach different things, so all but one must be wrong. Which one is right, if any is? You can't tell, because there is no proof for any of them.
The alternative way of looking at it is that they are all right, but incomplete and riddled with error, because they are attempts by humans to understand something which is unknowable.
My opinion? It's all a load of c***.
You are deeply convinced that you are not convinced?Personally I am a deeply convinced agnostic
What is really going on ?^ I am deeply convinced that it's impossible for the human brain / human being to fully understand, much less KNOW, what is really going on in the universe...
^ I am deeply convinced that it's impossible for the human brain / human being to fully understand, much less KNOW, what is really going on in the universe...
What is really going on ?
You mean quantum mechanics and cosmology ?
We already know a very great deal, and with every passing year we know more. We are also good at inventing tools to help us, like computers and telescopes. It's quite conceivable that further evolution of our brains coupled with incredibly powerful quantum computers will enable us to understand the rest.Someone once told me that if the human brain was simple enough for us to be able to understand we would then be too simple to understand it. Catch 22.
To understand the whole universe we would need brains more complex than the whole universe which can't happen because we are part of the universe. Paradox.
Bollocks.Someone once told me that if the human brain was simple enough for us to be able to understand we would then be too simple to understand it. Catch 22.
To understand the whole universe we would need brains more complex than the whole universe which can't happen because we are part of the universe. Paradox.
once you've achieved singularity you build vast dyson spheres, tap the power of your local stars thusly to build hyper dense bose-einstein condensates about the size of a skyscraper. You put them in orbit around convenient brown dwarf stars and run the human iterations in them virtually, only observable time for the user experience is slowed down drastically so a single actual day stretches for a year of observed experience. That way we can outlive the final heat death of the universe.We already know a very great deal, and with every passing year we know more. We are also good at inventing tools to help us, like computers and telescopes. It's quite conceivable that further evolution of our brains coupled with incredibly powerful quantum computers will enable us to understand the rest.
What the f*** we do after that would be a problem, though.....
Civilisation, democracy and education would help.yebbut understanding the physics/ mechanics of the universe is one thing. Finding a way to reduce human cruelty and suffering is another question. is there any ideology or organisation - religious or not - that could move us on in that respect?