DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
This is completely awful:
Revealed: undercover UK police officer deceived woman into 19-year relationship
Victim’s family accuse Avon and Somerset police of bullying and attempting to cover up deceptionwww.theguardian.com
What is even worse is he seems to have deceived the woman, simply because he could:
View attachment 390472
Rough timeline from article:Sounds like he was at best a sociopath who got a thrill out of deceiving her and her family.
Cunt.
- 2001: Undercover officer began pursuing 'Mary’ and established relationship with her
- 2006: Undercover officer leaves West Midlands Police & transfers to Avon & Somerset Constabulary
- 2013: Undercover officer leaves police
- (by) 2013: Senior officers in ASC “discovered that one of their officers had been using his undercover identity to deceive a woman into a relationship for many years, and that she had given birth to his child”
- 2016: ASC referred the matter to the Undercover Policing Inquiry
- 2019: Undercover officer proposes to ‘Mary’ and they become engaged to be married
- August 2020: ASC officers tell ‘Mary’ her husband-to-be had been using a fake undercover police legend for the entirety of their 19 year-long relationship
- until September 2023: ASC does everything it can to maintain the silence of ‘Mary’ and her family
As you can see, there are a lot of gaps and many unanswered questions. The article alleges ASC police, in the period between telling ‘Mary’ in 2020 and it coming out now, “cautioned that hardened criminals who were infiltrated by the undercover officer many years ago could seek retribution by harming Mary and her son”... Are they suggesting the officer used the same false identity both for his ‘legitimate’ undercover work against ‘hardened criminals’, and in his personal deception operation against ‘Mary’? What sort of work ID did he have and use, what sort of audit trail is there? Were no warning systems in ASC or the Home Office triggered by, for example, a false passport being used far beyond its legitimate lifetime? No collection of supporting documents at the end of deployment?
Meanwhile: ASC apology statement
Last edited: