Paul Marsh
NeitherWashingtonNorMecca
What's the betting that one consequence of this issue is that Searchlight offer to "inspect" the SWPs membership list so as to "check" for other infiltrators?
You mean they don't already?Paul Marsh said:What's the betting that one consequence of this issue is that Searchlight offer to "inspect" the SWPs membership list so as to "check" for other infiltrators?
levien said:As soom one named in the article perhaps people will listerned to me on this one. I'm going to say very little as its our internal issue and frankly non off your business.
Absolute nonsense. If I remember correctly, other groups such as trade unions and the Green Party are involved with UAF, and doubtless will be thrilled to know that your incompetant policy of recruiting anyone without asking many or any question (reminiscent of the Foreign Legion methinks) has placed members at risk.
Also, what about those who are not aligned to any group, but simply supported UAF as they considered it a good cause. Getting threatened and abused by the fash when you've signed up to take that risk is one thing, it comes with the territory and most anti-fascists know this, and I've had low-level harrassment myself, but suffering the same sort of thing simply because you left your details on a meeting attendance sheet is another matter entirely.
The least the SWP could do is try to find out what information has been passed to the fash, and liaise with other groups and individuals to make them aware of the potential risks (if any) that they are now facing. It remains to be seen whether this will actually happen.
Finally, my sympathy to those who have been betrayed by these people. Its always awful to know that comrades and friends you worked with were wearing more than one face. Sorry guys.
God that brings back memories. Nasty old fight that one. But in principle of course anything is possible. If the ACPO can ban the BNP from wearing police uniforms in the present climate then given enough pressure you never know...HST said:They won't get kicked out of uni for being fascists. Someone mentioned Patrick Harrington - he was a fascist at North West London Poly in the 80s. A very left wing institution then. I believe he wound up being taught as an individual (no lectures or seminars) and generally being treated like a leper. That's what'll happen to these two. Probably reinforce their fascism unfortunately.
bolshiebhoy said:Sorry but the people who ran Britain's universities didn't seem to have many qualms about helping the police and government witch-hunt trots in the 60's so claims of academic freedom ring a little hollow.
I agree, and I think it can actually get them sympathy as it seems that the system has got it in for them. However, as someone who has had to work with a NF member (this was a very long time ago) I think that the response has to come from the fellow students/workers. Let them do their degrees in isolation. BTW, don't think much for their job prospects.bristle-krs said:i don't think anti-fascism is particularly well-served by calls to ban people from jobs or education for the beliefs they hold.
Leaving aside for the mo the fact that Paisley has more in common with Grifin than the average Ogra member, I'd like to see them try. Funnily enough the same arguments were raised (not by Shinners though, they wanted to go the airport with hurley sticks) when David Irving visited Trinity College Dublin in the 80's: 'Next they'll be banning the SF speakers, or Palestinians'. It all depends where the pressure for a ban on fascists is coming from, not just the formal legalistic side of things. An angry anti-bnp campus is not one to allow Rectors to start banning left/progressive speakers.Idris2002 said:I could see the DUP demanding that Queen's student members of Ógra Sinn Fein be banned, and using bans on fash students as a precedent.
They'd be highly unlikely to get away with it, obv, but they'd still try it on. . . sure you want to be in the same area as the DUP?
maybe it does sound 'cultish' but as a member for a while i slip easily into left verbage. Unlike yourself who would never when talking about WP as 'the Group' or 'the fifth international'
As long as fees are involved the uni can't throw them out for their political views, unless explicitly stated in the uni statutes that BNP members are not welcome as students. Throwing them out for their political views would leave the uni open to a law suit and more free publicity for the BNP. An attempt at Salford Uni to have Wentworth booted failed dismally.
Oh, and by the way, no-one had heard of Tony Wentworth before that campaign, afterwards he didn't have to do anywork to build up his public profile as youth leader of the BNP. Through publicity in the national and academic press, the ANL did all that work for him.
Who you calling a liberal?bolshiebhoy said:How did I get suckered into a debate with liberals about No Platform on this of all threads.
Fuck off till you learn to argue politely ya twatDr. Christmas said:There's no debate about no platform you pious wanker.
Your 'kick them out' plan is legally impossible and will only serve to do all their publicity work for them without them lifting a finger (i.e. they announce themselves as BNP members and leave you to plaster their mug all over the national, anti-fascist and academic press for them).
When will the abject wrong headedness of your tactics penetrate your armour plated Trotskyite skull?
Same reasons as banning parties mate, could be us next...flypanam said:Don't see why they should be allowed to do their degrees. get them out now.