Ax^
Silly Rabbit
Yeah, saw a picture of Trump giving her a cuddle at Mar-a-lago.
His wife was in New York because she calls his place in Florida a swamp.
Yeah, saw a picture of Trump giving her a cuddle at Mar-a-lago.
His wife was in New York because she calls his place in Florida a swamp.
One amusing take I heard is that his own team are spreading rumours they're having an affair because that's better than people thinking he's taking advice off her.FFS "Donald Trump and Laura Loomer" could hardly sound more like a comic book supervillain couple.
Perhaps... maybe if Melania's been getting stick for not playing the dutiful wife, given the importance of the role of the wife in campaigning over there and the First Lady role, then maybe she wants to deflect some of the attention/ire?I wonder if Mrs Trump has a hand in spreading/embellishing this story?
She must have been in divorce suit evidence gathering mode for some time now
The dope opens his gob and gives imo a veiled instruction to vote for Trump
'Choose the lesser evil' in US election, says Pope as Catholic leader criticises Kamala Harris and Donald Trump
Pope Francis made the remarks after a 12-day international tour and said both US presidential hopefuls have policies that are "against life".news.sky.com
Pope Francis has called both major US presidential candidates "against life" and advised Catholic voters to choose the "lesser evil" when casting their ballots in the November election. The pontiff said not welcoming migrants - seemingly referring to Trump - is a "grave" sin, and compared Kamala Harris's stance on abortion to an "assassination". “Both are against life, be it the one who kicks out migrants, or be it the one who kills babies″ the Pope said in rare political comments at a Friday news conference
he encouraged Americans to vote. "Not voting is ugly. It is not good. You must vote," he said. "You must choose the lesser evil. Who is the lesser evil? That lady, or that gentleman? I don't know. Everyone, in conscience, (has to) think and do this."
It isn't an endorsement of either of them. I was replying to a post which claimed it was an instruction to vote for Trump.Difficult choice though - getting migrants to leave the country or assassinating babies
Hardly an endorsement of Harris at all.
Not a lot of difference but if you read it literally the statement seems more of an endorsement of Trump than of Harris: "assassinating" babies?It isn't an endorsement of either of them. I was replying to a post which claimed it was an instruction to vote for Trump.
I'd be interested to know whether people really think it would be a good idea for the Pope to explicitly endorse one candidate over the other. My opinion is that it wouldn't.
Not a lot of difference but if you read it literally the statement seems more of an endorsement of Trump than of Harris: "assassinating" babies?
She's stuck with him given she is a Catholic.I wonder if Mrs Trump has a hand in spreading/embellishing this story?
She must have been in divorce suit evidence gathering mode for some time now
No, but describing her stance on abortion as assassinating babies seems to me the greater of two evils. I think a lot of Catholics will see it as such. The alternative isn't assassinating migrants.He has literally said that both are against life - see my quote above.
Do you think he should explicitly endorse Harris?
I agree that assassinating isn't a great choice of words, but I don't think that should obscure his wider point.No, but describing her stance on abortion as assassinating babies seems to me the greater of two evils. I think a lot of Catholics will see it as such. The alternative isn't assassinating migrants.
Eta: it's also a bit too close to Trump's "executing" babies after they've been born.
Must admit I took it as a tacit nudge to vote Harris but I might well be projecting.
It isn't an endorsement of either of them. I was replying to a post which claimed it was an instruction to vote for Trump.
I'd be interested to know whether people really think it would be a good idea for the Pope to explicitly endorse one candidate over the other. My opinion is that it wouldn't.
Yes can quite see that, too. Not sure how Catholics would feel though, and lays it open for Trump to start saying that he the pope agrees with him about Harris assassinating babies.
That's not the pope's position, though. Catholic church in general around the world has for decades and still does actively agitate for the banning of abortion for everyone. This Pope is no different.If it helps, I'm a Catholic, and if I were voting according to my understanding and interpretation of Catholic teaching, I'd vote for Harris.
The fact that it's a sin for Catholics to practice abortion doesn't mean that I think abortion shouldn't be available for those who choose it.
That's not the pope's position, though. Catholic church in general around the world has for decades and still does actively agitate for the banning of abortion for everyone. This Pope is no different.
No idea. Don't much care. It makes the Catholic church a force for ill.I guess that makes me a heretic then...
Yes. And that's a mark of the shitness of the politics of his position.The Pope doesn't strike me as a stupid man, he's pitching on a question he knows has the possibility of alienating large numbers of the flock either way and has hedged by saying they're both shit. Trying to read a personal lean into it disregards the politics of his own postion.