Christ, I just went to vegan revolution's twitter, they're a proper nasty piece of shit, full on antisemite, with 63,000 followers. Reporting them, with twitter's new rules.
That's the thing, because of what they eat / don't eat they genuinely think they're living a morally superior life, whilst spending their time spewing hatefilled racist bile.
Not come across this thread before and haven't previously seen nationalist/racist sympathy type stuff like it in relation to veggie/vegan issues. Would I be right in thinking it has some kind of origin in eco-nationalist/anti-globalist ideas?
Not sure what bollocks you're yapping on about now tbh. For a start I'm nowhere near "angry" and secondly, in spite of the strong meathead resistance particularly from the more bloodthirsty hardcore ones, there is a steady growth in interest and take up of veganism. If China can somehow manage to wise up and becomes more civilised and stops trying to adopt the SAD crap, we might even reach critical mass by 2045.
Your true colours are starting to show here.
Pa's really squeamish, he even looks away when cutting bacon or sausages on his plate
Again, more incoherent nonsense, looks like that completely run out of argument and getting desperate.
Nature vs nurture. Indeed some people have been brought up with that kind of thing and don't feel at all squeamish at all and some of the hunting psychos love that shit. A substantial (an growing) number of compassionate and civilised people don't much care for blood and guts and are repulsed by it. Which explains why youtube have warnings on those types of videos. I suppose that we could "train them early" in schools so that children can get used to what some believe comes naturally, although somehow I doubt that that will ever become a popular addition to the national curriculum, but you never know.
lol, lbj's "phone a friend" shows up right on cue. It is indeed incoherent nonsense accusations, he appears to have run out of ideas, and so do you, adding nothing of any value to the thread just cowardly digs.
you're not even adding cowardly digs
It does suggest, though, that the idea that if people were closer to the "animal/death/blood" bit of the process, they wouldn't eat meat - is fallacious.
Yes, and?
Like I said, nothing of value. Lame accusation without any foundation.
Sounds more like the actions of a psycho nutcase like yourself might get up to.
...and yet there are very examples of that very thing happening. People who were "close to the action" have stopped notable examples being Howard Lyman, John Robbins and Phillip Wollen. Like I said we can put this to the test by putting children in touch with their true meat eating nature and see how it goes.
It was bollocks then and is still bollocks now.
