Conspiraloons – why...?
- Thread starter jæd
- Start date
siarc said:
The rate at which knowledge is able to be shared today is not comparable to the past.
siarc said:
People realising the need for economic reform and understanding the reasons behind the structure of the present system is paramount i`d agree. No one wants to be annointed as anything, they just want to express themselves like anyone else does. I can`t remember which it was psychologist that put the desire for expression highest in the model of human need.
Schumann resonance?
siarc said:
I try not to speculate too far into the future. In fighting and treachery has always ruined the path of those who worship ego, that much I know.
pembrokestephen
New Member
You're that spambot thing that generates text for getting past heuristic filters, and I claim my £5.siarc said:
pembrokestephen
New Member
*giggles*pk said:
pk said:
what is this nonsense? some of you people wouldn't know spinoza if the ethics fell off a bookshelf and hit you on the face! it is quite reasonable to assume the artificial and contrived separation of natural science and metaphysics that occured hundreds of years ago will collapse, perhaps even within our lifetime. this needless splitting of fields of thought is symptomatic of the dividing instincts of oligarchical capitalism, the false 'enlightenment' (aufklarung) that is coeval with the collapse of simple mercantilism and the birth of dynasties like the rothschilds that control the system of exchanges to this day.
pembrokestephen
New Member
Nah, mate. I'm trying to give it up.laptop said:
*pats ample stomach*
this works both ways. if a phaenomenon comparable to the cathar heresiarchs occured today, it would be apparent to everyone far sooner, including those who wished to destroy it.
free expression must not be groupuscular, there are many who reject the inspirations of our forefathers and cannot parse the ideologies of capital on even an unconscious level, such that 'productivity' is only significant for them on economic terms.
what do you understand by schumann resonance? i had only ever thought of ionospheric resonance as a synechdoche for the noesis, never on its own terms, though i reject de chardin who was a witch doctor and an idiot. can we learn from it?
is this not the path followed by the naysayers on this thread? i have even been described as a 'spambot', as if i have no autonomous consciousness and regurgitate only the tripe inculcated by my masters, and they see no irony in this! the ego metastasises into the chorus of undead voices, imprecating capital to feed them and take away the nasty thoughts, let the nightmare finish. we should have sympathy for them.
Derian said:
what the fuck is this shit? aufklarung is just the german name for 'the enlightenment' as distinct from the 'secular' use of that term. it was a common loan word in nineteenth century english
i was trying to show how the enlightement of goethe, schiller, kant etc occured in places like weimar and frankfurt am main precisely at the same time as the nascent banking families of europe were establishing themselves.
siarc said:what the fuck is this shit? aufklarung is just the german name for 'the enlightenment' as distinct from the 'secular' use of that term. it was a common loan word in nineteenth century english
i was trying to show how the enlightement of goethe, schiller, kant etc occured in places like weimar and frankfurt am main precisely at the same time as the nascent banking families of europe were establishing themselves.
Yes. I know.
*whoosh*
laptop said:
they can both be understood as developing from the masonic rites of various central european principalities. it's known for instance that meyer amschel rothchild supplied not only credit, but also children, to the duchy of saxe-gotha. these pederastic rituals were probably at the behest of the electors of the holy roman empire. there were originally eight electors, and with the demise of papal oversight the original credit system was replaced with a numismatic order as represented by the rothschilds. the electors and the banking families were from this time intertwined, and with financial power they could support writers like goethe and kleist. goethe was probably also a mason and his writings are pederastic, albeit in a codified fashion, but this can be decrypted.
Badger Kitten
oof
You are a stoned/tripped out second year philosophy student and I claim my fiver. Quite good trolling, but your rubbish spelling and grammar give you away.
Badger Kitten
oof
sorry.
Badger Kitten said:
if only we open our eyes, the signs abound
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office#The_IAO_Logo
they mock us openly
there is no longer any concealment, as lyotard suggests, late capitalism need not induce the listless to labour when the notion of autonomy is reified as automatous in itself
http://www.whale.to/b/sp/rothschild...F_ARTICLES_ON_THE_TOP_13_ILLUMINATI_FAMILIES_
Iam said:Oh, look. A link.
Well, if it's posted on the 'net somewhere, it must be true.
Yeah, that clinches it for me.
that is of course a libel and a fallacy
how does it follow that something on the internet cannot be true
if you cannot see beyond simple binary oppositions then you are simply falling into a trap they have set for you; it's a simple one, but it works
'the commensurate value of death relinquishes nothing, forestalls nothing; only an absolute evil can convince itself that abjection possesses a rectitude and logic unto itself, as the flustered eagle tears off the limbs of the spartan infant upon the hillside'
bataille, ecrits
You do realise I'm going to need documentation on who funded Kant before I start seriously reconsidering the motives for the Aufklarung, don't you?
Though I do have to say that it's entirely unclear to me how Spinoza supported himself, having been expelled by the synagogue and his family and all. Were the Anabaptists he ended up hanging out with rich by then?
Though I do have to say that it's entirely unclear to me how Spinoza supported himself, having been expelled by the synagogue and his family and all. Were the Anabaptists he ended up hanging out with rich by then?
Similar threads
