Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

CIA knew of 9/11 - told Admin - Covered Up for Inquiry

DrRingDing said:
This place is your CV.

Regardless of you real opinions, If I was in your position I would be concerned about being blacklisted if I had precarious work in the media like yours.

To clarify I also can see from your character that you could well be sincere in your belief in that the US admin clique had no prior knowledge or desire for a terrorist attack on home soil.
 
DrRingDing said:
Because you accused me of being a gap year twat, when I'm trying to make a real difference off my own back when I could be living a comfy life with my woman in Denmark.

I do not consider myself morallly superior to the editor or kyser.

I asked if you were a gap year student. You seem to have decided that you are a possible twat yourself. I then pointed out that you described yourself as a ''work shy cunt''. Your response was to throw insults around.
 
DrRingDing said:
Badger Kitten try not take it personally.

See my previous post. You seem to have decided to throw personal insults about, then to patronise me. I merely asked if you were trying to get banned on purpose? Are you trying to get banned? If so why? And why the personal insults? Is that part if a campaign to get banned too?
 
DrRingDing said:
To clarify I also can see from your character that you could well be sincere in your belief in that the US admin clique had no prior knowledge or desire for a terrorist attack on home soil.
That's not his position. I don't think it's anyone's. You'd have to be a 5* muppet to take any government at their word. The reason for all the anger is that some people have guarded skepticism, whereas other people have open-skulled belief in fantastic theories. The two groups will never see eye to eye, so it all goes round and round in circles until we end up in this sad petty mess that this thread is in. (back that up! lier! you said! but you said! etc.)
 
DrRingDing said:
Regardless of you real opinions, If I was in your position I would be concerned about being blacklisted if I had precarious work in the media like yours.
What "precarious work in the media," please?

You don't even fucking know what I do, you pathetic liar.
 
DrRingDing said:
To clarify I also can see from your character that you could well be sincere in your belief in that the US admin clique had no prior knowledge or desire for a terrorist attack on home soil.
More lies!
:rolleyes:

Feel free to explain what you can supposedly see from "my character".

For a truthseeker you sure like to pump out endless personal attacks and lies from a position of total ignorance.
 
DrRingDing said:
You write techy articles no?
I do a lot of things, none of which is your business, or which you know anything about.

But be sure to explain how my supposed "precarious work in the media" influences my posting and moderating here please.
 
DrRingDing said:
You've wanted to perma ban me for a long time I suspect but remmeber what I said in the pm.
Your PM was a load of bizarre, ill-informed bollocks from someone who clearly knows nothing about the subject.

And the only reason you'll be perma banned is if you persist on posting up FAQ-busting lies about my personal life.
 
editor said:
What "precarious work in the media," please?

You don't even fucking know what I do, you pathetic liar.
It's pretty easy to figure out though. 30 seconds work with google.
 
Crispy said:
It's pretty easy to figure out though. 30 seconds work with google.
No, it's not. You haven't a clue what my main current freelance jobs are.

Either way, it's utterly irrelevant to 9/11 or my moderating or my opinions expressed here.
 
DrRingDing said:
Completely destroying both of the wtcs!?

You *are* aware of it that this was not the intention since this could not be expected?
Because as far as *my* information goes, no matter who was responsible or plotted or executed the attack could not have dreamt *that* to be the final result.

salaam.
 
An apology.

I take back the following comment I retorted to the editor accusing him of being... "too busy trying to score jobs with mutlinational media companies" to read Manufacturing Consent.
 
Aldebaran said:
You *are* aware of it that this was not the intention since this could not be expected?
Because as far as *my* information goes, no matter who was responsible or plotted or executed the attack could not have dreamt *that* to be the final result.

salaam.
That may not be the case. It is reliably reported that experienced demolition contractors saw the danger of collapse just from the TV images.
On that cloudless September morning, the imminent collapse was horribly apparent to veteran implosion experts like Mark Loizeaux. Watching the events unfold on television, Mark knew immediately that the towers would fall. “Within a nanosecond. I said, ‘It’s coming down. And the second tower will fall first, because it was hit lower down,’” he recalled. “I thought, Somebody’s got to tell the fire department to get out of there. I picked up the phone, dialled 411, got the number, and tried it – busy. So I called the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management.” It was in 7 World Trade Centre. He couldn’t get through. [Rubble, p.252]
source
 
Mark Loizeaux (whose company - 'Controlled Demolition' had the contract for the clean up) also informs of the pools of molten steel which existed for over a month after.
 
Jazzz said:
Mark Loizeaux (whose company - 'Controlled Demolition' had the contract for the clean up) also informs of the pools of molten steel which existed for over a month after.
Please don't repeat yourself all over again.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom