“illness is neither an indulgence for which people have to pay, nor an offence for which they should be penalised, but a misfortune, the cost of which should be shared by the community
Nye Bevan, 1961
“illness is neither an indulgence for which people have to pay, nor an offence for which they should be penalised, but a misfortune, the cost of which should be shared by the community
New Catholic cardinal renews attack on 'disgraceful' UK austerity cuts
http://www.theguardian.com/society/...ent-nichols-attacks-welfare-cuts-pope-francis
A new First Tier Tribunal bedroom tax appeal decision from Liverpool, again a successful one, and this time on wholly new grounds. The decision statement is here (and also on the FTT decisions page)
This is a first for a Tribunal finding on these grounds. I understand that the grounds echo those of the Liberty backed Judicial Review of the bedroom tax Regulations, brought by a separated family and children. This JR is ongoing, as far as I know, but I haven’t heard anything of its progress.
There is the usual question of how the FTT deals with ‘reading in accordance with’. The FTT has a track record of taking that to mean ‘pretending the regulations say what they ought to’, which is not how the higher courts will deal with the issue.
But this is a whole new ground for FTT appeals. And it will be very interesting to see how these play out.
In one of the most significant political interventions by leading members of the Church of England since the Faith in the City report in 1985, 25 of its bishops have blamed "cutbacks to and failures in the benefit system" for forcing people to use food banks. They are joined by two bishops from the Church in Wales, 14 Methodist districts chairs and two Quakers
God hates Tories:
Bishops blame David Cameron for food bank crisis
It's already had a big piece on the BBC news channel.Afaic, there is no coverage of this on the broadcast media: BBC News Channel, Sky, yet the BBC will report every single negative policy/utterance from the Coalition about benefits, etc.
That's why I posted the link at gone 3 in the morning - before it disappeared in a tide of trivia.Afaic, there is no coverage of this on the broadcast media: BBC News Channel, Sky, yet the BBC will report every single negative policy/utterance from the Coalition about benefits, etc.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5abc8d36-9a28-11e3-8232-00144feab7de.html#ixzz2ttuKIhdX
Outsource group seeks exit from UK £500m benefits contract after death threats
By Gill Plimmer
©Alamy
Persistent death threats against staff who decide whether sick and disabled people are eligible for benefits have forced the private company employing them to seek an early exit from a £500m government contract.
With opposition Labour MPs also stepping up criticism, Atos Healthcare said the political environment had become untenable and that it was no longer fair to employees to leave them vulnerable to attack.
“It is becoming incredibly difficult for our staff; it’s pretty unpleasant,” people close to the company said.
About 163 incidents of the public assaulting or abusing staff were recorded each month last year, Atos said.
At protests outside 45 Atos offices this week, names of individual doctors were chanted, while many of the 2,000 staff employed to carry out the work had received death threats both in person or on Facebook and Twitter, as well as bullying at the company’s assessment centres.
Examples on Facebook include: “murdering scumbags . . . won’t be smiling when we come to hang you bastards”. Another says: “Know anyone who works for Atos? Kill them.”
The French IT company has been in discussions with the Department for Work and Pensions with a view to exiting the deal since October last year, because it views the tests as “outdated”.
“In its current form it is not working for claimants, for DWP or for Atos Healthcare,” Atos said. “For several months now we have been endeavouring to agree an early exit from the contract, which is due to expire in August 2015.”
“Despite these ongoing discussions, we will not walk away from a front-line service. Our total focus remains on delivering the services we are contracted to provide in a professional and compassionate way, until a new service begins.”
Atos has become a lightning rod for discontent over the coalitions’s welfare reforms, which aim to shift more people off social security benefits and into work.
For the past three years, the company has been under fire for its handling of work capability tests, which assess whether people are well enough to apply for jobs.
A third of its decisions were overturned on appeal, amid allegations that people with terminal cancer or other serious illnesses had been denied benefits as a result of its assessments.
Last July, the DWP told Atos to improve the quality of written reports provided to the department.
Atos said it had improved processes and that appeal court judges had said its reports were the reason for a successful appeal in fewer than 1 per cent of cases.
A National Audit Office report also warned there were “dangers” in viewing high numbers of appeals as a measure of the quality of medical assessment work undertaken by Atos.
“An appeal may be successful because the information available to the tribunal was not known at the time of the original assessment,” the NAO said.
“In addition, a decision made by the Department on benefit entitlement will draw on other sources of information as well as the medical assessment.”
Atos has been the sole provider of work capability tests since 1998, when the then Labour government first handed the job to the private sector.
It won a competition under the last Labour administration to continue providing the assessments for five years from 2005, which was then extended until August 2014. The company earns revenues of £110m a year from the contract.
The DWP said it would not comment on specifics of commercially sensitive issues. “We announced [last] summer we will be bringing in additional provision to deliver Work Capability Assessments with the aim of increasing delivery capacity and reducing waiting times,” it added.
Despite the furore, Atos was awarded a fresh deal last year to carry out tests for the new personal independence payment (Pip), with the aim of reducing the projected cost of the benefit by 20 per cent by 2015-16. It replaces the disability living allowance and determines whether people are entitled to extra money to help cope with disability – such as cars, equipment or nursing.
Atos’s £400m Pip contracts over five years cover the southeast and north of the country, accounting for about 75 per cent of disability living allowance claimants. Capita, a rival outsourcing company, has the remainder.
Private providers likely to be in the frame for the next work capability contract include G4S, Serco, A4E and Capita.
According to an NAO report on the government’s four biggest suppliers, Atos earned £700m in revenues from the public sector in the UK in 2012, of £7.2bn sales worldwide. The company made an average net profit margin of about 2 per cent over the past decade, rising to 3 per cent in 2012.
Examples on Facebook include: “murdering scumbags . . . won’t be smiling when we come to hang you bastards”. Another says: “Know anyone who works for Atos? Kill them.”
The French IT company has been in discussions with the Department for Work and Pensions with a view to exiting the deal since October last year, because it views the tests as “outdated”.
“In its current form it is not working for claimants, for DWP or for Atos Healthcare,” Atos said. “For several months now we have been endeavouring to agree an early exit from the contract, which is due to expire in August 2015.”
There was another story my g/f mentioned a while back re. performance of different WP contractors.Good article. Explains these shitstains in power perfectly.
The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) is threatening the Department of Work and Pensions with court action for suspending the benefits of a blind man after he missed appointments which he was only informed about through letters he was not able to read......
"We get these complaints all the time," Fothergill said. She added that the DWP's system for sending out accessible information was "appalling" and "not fit for purpose". The DWP were "making blanket decisions" to sanction people rather than looking at their individual circumstances.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/19/rnib-dwp-blind-court-action-benefits
The Committee is particularly interested to hear views on:
Submissions do not need to address all of these points.
- Delivery of the WCA by Atos, including steps taken to improve the claimant experience
- The effectiveness of the WCA in indicating whether claimants are fit for work, especially for those claimants who have mental, progressive or fluctuating illnesses, including comparison with possible alternative models
- The process and criteria for procuring new providers of the WCA
- The ESA entitlement decision-making process
- The reconsideration and appeals process
- The impact of time-limiting contributory ESA
- Outcomes for people determined fit for work or assigned to the WRAG or the Support Group
- The interaction between ESA and Universal Credit implementation
The deadline for submitting evidence is Friday 21 March.
Bet they'll still get paid in full up to original date though!Just the other week an Atos shill was extolling the virtues of their WCA and all the happy clients/customers/claimants/stock that go through it to the *EDIT* Public Administration Select Committee.. Yet in the article it states..
Wading through government, DWP and corporate outsourcing bullshit.
Pretty much when you made your post. I'm no fan of the bbc coverage of cuts, but you've got to give them more than an hour, esp when the thing had only been released that morning.oops, what time was that?
I deliberately watched a whole hour from 11-12, it is on text service.
And Today certainly did a piece on it.It's already had a big piece on the BBC news channel.
There was another story my g/f mentioned a while back re. performance of different WP contractors.
Some were actually very good at helping long-term unemployed re-skill and find sustainable employment; the majority were just fascist sanction generators.
And Today certainly did a piece on it.
as much as i would agree about media bias in reporting on welfare, it's also the case that 24-hour rolling news means the nature of the stories that lead bulletins has changed greatly as well.fair enough, but a few years ago it would have led the bulletins through the whole day.
Where they tell you to phone an office to find out if they, the person you are asking at the desk, can take a payment for a budgeting loan.http://www.southwales-eveningpost.c...tory-20644155-detail/story.html#ixzz2thjfvqwX
Removing phones from job centres?, when you can be sanctioned for not making the correct number of applications, not connected....
We Challenge Labour Campaign
Ed Miliband says he will reverse the Bedroom Tax, NHS Privatisation, Work Capability Test, & Sack Atos Healthcare!
To do this would take the repealing of the Welfare Reform Act 2012 by his party,so Ed are you going to do this?
Naturally a new Welfare Bill would need to be put in its place, I'll leave that job to Labour Party. As a labour supporter all my life I say put your money where your mouth is?
PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT AN ATTACK ON THE LABOUR PARTY BUT IF HE WANTS TO PUT PEOPLE BACK IN POLITICS HERE A CHANCE!
The CHALLENGE : Our Vote In Exchange for a Fairer Society, we the undersigned call for Ed Miliband to state he will repeal the Welfare Reform bill 2012 should he be elected in 2015