Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

But it makes sense from the full-throttle Randian neoliberalism perspective. Any type of state support is socialism and anti-liberty and basically evil and should be abolished for the good of all.
Making sense from a Randian perspective does not make these attitudes sane though does it?

That's the scary thing here, not that the guy is nuts but that he's talking from an entire intellectual perspective developed for and by the elite, and among his peers he'll be able to find plenty of people to agree with him.

You are right it is scary, on account of most of us being able to realise the psychopathy of that 'intellectual perspective developed for and by the elite' you refer to. It's anti-human on every level IMO. The elite are also dehumanised by their participation and perpetuation of it. The fact it protects them and their double standards is their reward.
 
My eyessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss, someone please put this man out of his demented misery! :mad::(:facepalm::confused:



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ing-in-tradition-of-abolitionist-9080982.html
Article makles 2 mistakes:

Cait Reilly and Jamie Wilson's schem was not declared unlawful, the way the DWP lied to them that it was madatory was the reason they won. I wish these schemes were outlawed, but they haven't been.

It also fails to correct the errant use of the term 'spare room subsidy', deliberately used by MP's to make the bedroom tax sound less evil. A subsidy is what you give someone, not what you take from them, and Housing Benefit has never had any such component either.
 
“It’s one of those programmes to get middle England ‘up in arms’," O'Grady told presenters Matt Baker and Alex Jones.
"These people are the sacrificial lambs on the altar of light entertainment and they have gone willingly: a smart tongue has got them to say all sorts and it is a very unfair representation of unemployment in this country.
"A lot of people do not choose to be on benefits and this is portraying everyone on benefits as doing it because they want to, not because they have to - it's shocking.”
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...ady-calls-cast-sacrificial-lambs-9063581.html


Paul '0 Grady sticks up for claimants again, but 'viewers' complain that the One Show did not allow a contrasting opinion.

The 'contrasting opinion is available nearly very day, and who can forget the 'balanced' authored pieces such as John Humphries programme on benefits

btw, Smith really is barmy, how he survives in his post is incredible
 
Paul '0 Grady sticks up for claimants again, but 'viewers' complain that the One Show did not allow a contrasting opinion.

The 'contrasting opinion is available nearly very day, and who can forget the 'balanced' authored pieces such as John Humphries programme on benefits

btw, Smith really is barmy, how he survives in his post is incredible
and you can bet from this that a legion of tory tossers (like Michael Portillo who is happy to take their - our - coin) will think the BBC is lefty liberal nonsense.
 
"Black Dee" from the TV documentary Benefits Street is among a number of people living on the road who have been charged with drug and firearm offences.
Samora Roberts, known as Dee, 32, and a prominent character in the Channel 4 series, was charged with conspiracy to supply a class B controlled drug, conspiracy to supply crack cocaine, possession of diamorphine, or heroin, and possession of ammunition for a firearm without a certificate.
West Midlands police said the charges followed raids that took place last June at a number of addresses in the street, after concerns were raised by the community.
Police charged seven people with drug offences following the raids, in James Turner Street, Winson Green, Birmingham, and at an address in nearby Handsworth, before the series reached the screen.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...k-dee-drug-gun-charges?guni=Keyword:news-grid main-1 Main trailblock:Editable trailblock - news:position2

number of residents been arrested after police raid, I hope they also go after the idiots who who were threatening to kill some of the residents...
 
number of residents been arrested after police raid, I hope they also go after the idiots who who were threatening to kill some of the residents...
I remember doing my oral history training a couple of years ago and learning about the ethics of recording people, issues of power between interviewer and interviewee, making sure people were adequately informed about potential consequences of this work. Producing a documentary which results in the arrests of voluntary participants has got to be about as low as you can get ethics wise.
 
Last edited:
From the facebook page ‘Atos Miracles’, 24th Jan 2014

”As a Jobcentre worker who took early retirement last year to get away from the pressures & stress I can confirm what many contributors are saying. Since the change of government in 2010 there was a total shift in emphasis in what we are there for. It is now to “police” the benefit system, “protect the public purse” & deter people from claiming anything. We are NOT there to help or advise people anymore..."

http://welfaretales.wordpress.com/category/job-centre-2/
 
Can I just say all you lefties have not got a clue. You bang on about how its all unfair these cuts, oh how will I survive. You want to count yourself lucky there is a welfare as there are some countries in the developed world where there is either no welfare or it is so meagre you can just about afford bread and water. Labour kept borrowing to support the welfare and now the tories have had to clean up the mess and look like the Nasty party because the have to sort out the deficit.

Its simple Maths if your outgoings are more than your income you have to make cuts.

Think about that when you vote!!!
 
Can I just say all you lefties have not got a clue. <snip> Think about that when you vote!!!
Do you usually swagger into a pub and start shouting the odds at complete strangers, sweetie? A bit of lurking and reading to get the tone of the place before posting might have been a good idea. Do your lips move when you read? I'm sorry to say that you sound as if they do. You might at least use a few more punctuation marks - speech marks and apostrophes are free.

If you expect a reasoned debate, at least get your terms right. In the UK we do not have "welfare", we have "benefits". Why should I be grateful for crumbs from a system into which I've paid, my parents have paid, and my grandparents also paid? National insurance isn't worth the name unless it pays out promptly, efficiently, and adequately when you meet the criteria for making a benefit claim.

I trust that you will soon be able to return under your bridge, as soon as the flooding has receded.
 
Can I just say all you lefties have not got a clue. You bang on about how its all unfair these cuts, oh how will I survive. You want to count yourself lucky there is a welfare as there are some countries in the developed world where there is either no welfare or it is so meagre you can just about afford bread and water. Labour kept borrowing to support the welfare and now the tories have had to clean up the mess and look like the Nasty party because the have to sort out the deficit.

Its simple Maths if your outgoings are more than your income you have to make cuts.

Think about that when you vote!!!

What's "a welfare"?
 
Can I just say all you lefties have not got a clue. You bang on about how its all unfair these cuts, oh how will I survive. You want to count yourself lucky there is a welfare as there are some countries in the developed world where there is either no welfare or it is so meagre you can just about afford bread and water. Labour kept borrowing to support the welfare and now the tories have had to clean up the mess and look like the Nasty party because the have to sort out the deficit.

Its simple Maths if your outgoings are more than your income you have to make cuts.

Think about that when you vote!!!

Hmmm, thanks for your opinion. Here's a few facts for you (I'll start with something simple, so as not to over-tax your wits):

  1. We're not all lefties.
  2. As someone who actually understands the economics of austerity, I can tell you (though you'll doubtless refuse to believe me) that the cuts do actually fall asymmetrically - much harder on the lowest 2 deciles of the population than on any of the others. So yeah, "unfairness" is an issue, especially when it is blatantly obvious that the Chancellor is deliberately avoiding making too many cuts on blocks of people who he believes will be more likely to vote Tory.
  3. I don't "count myself lucky" that the UK has a welfare state, and here's why: My family and I, and tens of millions of others, all paid into a "pooled risk" (look that up, if you've the wit) insurance policy called "National Insurance". Social Security isn't, as people with opinions ,like yours would have it, a gift from the government. For most of us it's an entitlement we contributed to. Do you have any insurance policies you wouldn't make a claim on? Didn't think so!
  4. Labour didn't "keep borrowing to support welfare". Having looked at what the money between 2004/2005 and 2007 (the years when the structural deficit developed - all the other years that Labour were in power were in the black, as were the preceding 5 years under Major) was spent on, you'd have to blame, in order of expense: a) The NHS; b) Education, and c) our old friend infrastructure improvement. Now, if you have evidence to the contrary (that's evidence, not your opinion), that money was borrowed purely to support welfare, I'd be interested to see it.
  5. The Tories aren't sorting out the deficit. In fact we're in deeper now than we were in 2008 or 2010, purely on the basis that the Chancellor flatlined the economy through political meddling.
So how about engaging your brain? That way, you might look less like a know-nothing troll gobshite, and more like someone who actually exercises the muscle between their ears.
 
It's really not. That sort of thinking might scrape you through AS Level Economics, but it won't get you far in the real world.

TBF, I've seen that sort of thinking get people degrees in economics, over the last 20 or so years, now that it's all about teaching neo-classical economics, rather than the history of economic systems too.
 
Poor bastard. How undignified!
yes, it's not good to turn into a chocolate biscuit

penguin-bar-advert-006.jpg
 
I'm gobsmacked..!!! Lord Freud, Aaron Antonovsky,
Salutogenesis and what the fuck next..??

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/transforming-welfare

Capita welfare reform conference, London
How welfare has changed in the last 4 years.

s216_s960_freud-960.jpg

Thank you…..I am very pleased to be here.

I would like to use my time this morning to reflect on the past 4 years, and in particular how different the welfare landscape is now compared to 2010.

In short, it is very different. And the change has been long overdue.

We are introducing the most fundamental reforms to the welfare and pensions systems for more than 60 years.

These are structural changes designed to reward work, encourage responsibility and help those who need it most.

And we are already starting to see the impacts of these reforms.
 
Back
Top Bottom