Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

The obsession with punitive conditionality is obscene, people would jump at genuine help perhaps offered at a multi-purpose centre,

I know lets call them community centres, but aren't they being closed down?
Exactly. Getting some semblance of financial security, if only temporary, through winning my ESA tribunal has made all the difference. But the capitalists cannot and will not see how a carrot is better than the barbed wire wrapped club they currently use. It will become a vicious downward spiral until we descend into chaos. People always respond more to compassion honesty and support.
 
Benefits Street? It's nothing like the James Turner Street we researched
The fieldwork we did in Birmingham produced a picture of a community very different to that portrayed in Channel 4's series

"James Turner Street? I'm sure I've heard of it," I mused, when watching the trailer for the first episode of Channel 4's Benefits Street. But it didn't look like or seem to be the same street that I was soon to recall. Within a few seconds we had statistics quoted by a narrator – "only 5% working … almost everyone on benefits" – and residents to set the scene. Images of rubbish piled high were provided backed by a collection of dysfunctional individuals paraded in front of the cameras. And then it clicked.
I first went to James Turner Street in 2008 for my company, Vector Research. Specialising in researching what are known as "hard-to-access" groups and neighbourhoods, we had been commissioned by the city council and Urban Living, one of the government's housing pathfinder organisations seeking to improve communities in north-west Birmingham, to produce a report on the area. The project, conducted in partnership with Ark Housing Consultancy, was a neighbourhood renewal study to look at the conditions of properties and to gather a range of data from residents to identify their priorities for future intervention.


Great, Benefit Street exposed, got Love Productions bang to rights, the 'debate will be interesting, researchers who have worked in the area say it is nothing like the programme, yet policy is clearly being made on the back of that rubbish.
 
i don't think it's words that are needed unless those words are die scum! and issued shortly before doing violence unto their worthless bodies

edit: Actually, their bodies aren't worthless. Organ donation. I retract my insult.
 
Last edited:

<snip> This isn't heat or eat. This is can't heat OR eat.. !! :mad:

Edit to say.. I doubt my JSA will get me or my key/card meters to the next giro either.
That really is bad - even when my grant was late I could just about afford to use the cooker.

Benefit claims taking ages to start (and then to process) combined with near systematic dissuasion from putting in a claim in the first place are probably at the root of this. :mad:
 
That really is bad - even when my grant was late I could just about afford to use the cooker.

Benefit claims taking ages to start (and then to process) combined with near systematic dissuasion from putting in a claim in the first place are probably at the root of this. :mad:

Add in the sanctions dished out for ridiculous reasons and the price increases in food and fuel. It's a disaster.
 
FFS someone needs to reprogramme Rachel Reeves. This is where your policies will take us, the only difference is that the Tories get there quicker. High Speed Rail straight thorugh the twin constituencies of decency and compassion all the way to Black Heart Central.
 
I see Rachel 'hammer of the poor' Reeves is floating the idea of a 20 quid top up for claimants with more than five years NI

a) thats a risible amount

b) deserving/undeserving
She might as well just cross the floor. What's the point of her?

I say bombard her with messages telling her we don't want this shit.

For all the good it will do.
 
But it makes sense from the full-throttle Randian neoliberalism perspective. Any type of state support is socialism and anti-liberty and basically evil and should be abolished for the good of all. That's the scary thing here, not that the guy is nuts but that he's talking from an entire intellectual perspective developed for and by the elite, and among his peers he'll be able to find plenty of people to agree with him.
 
But it makes sense from the full-throttle Randian neoliberalism perspective. Any type of state support is socialism and anti-liberty and basically evil and should be abolished for the good of all. That's the scary thing here, not that the guy is nuts but that he's talking from an entire intellectual perspective developed for and by the elite, and among his peers he'll be able to find plenty of people to agree with him.
Apart from all the benefits he receives.

These people simply think benefits are, perversely, to be 'earned', which is their code word for 'hard working'.

Folk don't work and get paid. Instead they earn their money. People on shitty wages don't earn enough, in their vernacular, because they aren't, in the eyes of the tories, hard working enough. IDS earns lots because he's hard working (obviously!) and he's a tory (and all tories are, like pink elephants, hard working), so he's entitled (that word again) to a big fat house, a land subsidy, expenses, and hundreds of thousands, etc.

The whole thing is monstrously perverse. The guy is off his head.
 
Back
Top Bottom