Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

a Cardiff Against the Cuts Councillor told to 'get a life' and 'get a job' by a Labour Councillor
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/cardif...paigner-to-get-a-job-in-email-91466-32917113/
Responding to an email Ms Caldwell sent to all councillors, Coun Michael told the Llandaff resident: “Get a job, you obviously have too much time on your hands.” He goes on to suggest she “gets a hobby that does not involve sending daft and incorrect emails to councillors”.
Ms Caldwell, who founded the Green Dragon Preservation Society, said she was asking Labour to rethink the proposed Splott Pool and Cardiff Riding School closures.

Using his official council email account, Coun Michael replied: “Learn how a council and council finance works before making daft amendments to a budget process you don’t try to understand.
“Stop sending out e-mails in the name of a society that even though it has more members than pLIED councillors, seems to be a figment of your fertile imagination.”
campaigner accepted written apology
 
This statement was sent to one of our group member who forwarded it to us, we are unable to confirm details within - but alarm bells are ringing !!!

"I work within the Department for Work and Pensions so please don't use my name as it could cost me my job.

The dwp are rolling out nationally an initiative to work with 120k families whose lives are blighted by joblessness, single parents, crime an...d truancy. We have specially trained personnel to work closely with them to break these harmful trends and integrate them into society, improve their lives and make working the preferred options.

However what has not been released and is being kept hush hush is that these families are to achieve certain targets working with our staff and stakeholders, professional organisations which have been hand picked to get the desired results as expediently as possible. The department is investing a great deal of resources into this project and participants are to be under no illusions that equal investment and commitment are required from them. This will not be an option where families can choose not to be involved in.....if they refuse to participate, their benefits will be stripped under sanctions. If after a period of 26 weeks results are not forthcoming and improvements tangible and sustained all benefits will be withdrawn.

The adults will either have to work in any position that can be found and will be paid via fuel food and basic clothing. If the children continue to truant and participate in anti social behaviour those under 13 will be taken into care and those over 13 will be expected to work under the same terms as their parents with tutors twice weekly to ensure a basic level of literacy and numeracy. They will not be living with their parents but in dormitory accommodation. Tenders have been received and a short list drawn up for the lots as with pip.

Fore runners are G4S, Deloitte, Veolia, Capita and Serco Global Services

Myself and many other staff are horrified but are powerless to stop this. The Conservatives are saying they will save more on what they cut on the benefits including DLA for the people in these families getting high rates for anger and behavioural problems, housing benefits and benefits for babies and children. Any of the parents having children throughout or once they've failed the initiative will be taken into the care of local authorities. The families will be allowed supervised access at contact centres as deemed acceptable by the people overseeing the project and the handlers for the individual families.

This is all underway and being arranged as we speak. The govt see these families as an absolute blight on society and one way or another are determined to get rid of them in any way they can. Their view is that support and money haven't helped, ASBO's are a joke and seen as a badge of honour and children whether in these families or other families on low incomes are a drain on resources and they believe if they stop paying then the children will stop being born and those already here will have to either conform or to be excluded and earn their keep. To get disability allowance for children is going to be nigh on impossible which is why the reforms haven't targeted them, new plans are underway as the perception is that ALL children need care and parents know this before having them therefore there are only very rare circumstances where additional support is justifiable.

Thank You"See More
362Like · · Share
This is being reposted across the net, if correct as its only one source, dynamite, powerful stuff...

think this needs its own thread...
 
There's been a programme working with some of the famliies identified under these criteria that has completely failed, but nothing on that about permanent benefits being stopped and getting payments in kind or kids being taken into care, I would want to see confirmation of a lot of this before I give it any credibility tbh. They couldn't bring pre-pay cards in for claimants without new legislation, and there's maximum 3 year JSA sanctions, how are they going to do this stuff without new legislation? I don't think they can, but ianal of course.
 
There's been a programme working with some of the famliies identified under these criteria that has completely failed, but nothing on that about permanent benefits being stopped and getting payments in kind or kids being taken into care, I would want to see confirmation of a lot of this before I give it any credibility tbh. They couldn't bring pre-pay cards in for claimants without new legislation, and there's maximum 3 year JSA sanctions, how are they going to do this stuff without new legislation? I don't think they can, but ianal of course.

It's the way the wind's blowing though. And the govt have already proved themselves quite capable of introducing new legislation to get IDS out of the shite WRT the work programme.

TBH, I reckon if the idea of pre paid benefit cards was mooted enough people would support it to make it a goer.
 
Yesterday, Hull councillors Gary Wareing, Dean Kirk and Gill Kennett, the ‘Hull 3′ were victimised for their principled refusal to vote for the budget where cuts will throw 600 people out of work and further reduce services across the city.
Gary and Dean were ‘indefinitely suspended’ from the Labour group, Gill suspended for three months.
Such action for defiance of the whip is not obligatory on councils. Other councillors elsewhere in the past, such as in Broxtowe council in 2012, have not faced disciplinary action for sticking to their principles and voting against cuts in defiance of the majority of their Labour group.
...
Across the country, Labour and campaign activists and even MPs are watching the excellent film, Spirit of 45, about the creation of the welfare state and its step-by-step demolition by the Tories. You can do something to help stop some of that demolition now. Support campaigners against these cuts, support those who stand true to their principles.
Please support the ‘Hull 3′ as well as other councillors who also face victimisation.

Please Immediately email your protest to the leader of Hull Labour council, Stephen Brady, [email protected], and copy in our campaign at [email protected]. If you are in a trade union, particularly if it is a local government or Labour-affiliated one, move the motion below suitably amended.
Solidarity against all cuts!

http://councillorsagainstcuts.org/2...misation-of-hull-councillors-who-oppose-cuts/
 
The UK Crimestoppers organisation launched a campaign last year against benefit fraud, complete with a poster of angry screaming people (‘the public’) and the caption “WEL-UN-FARE – don’t let benefit fraud make you mad.”

from the article, i didn't know about that, who in that organisation made that decision to run that campaign?, very political..

btw, great research, well done Kent university social policy team,

can people repost on FB sites

off to ring KU..
 
from the article, i didn't know about that, who in that organisation made that decision to run that campaign?, very political..

btw, great research, well done Kent university social policy team,

can people repost on FB sites

off to ring KU..

Can't say I ever saw the posters myself. Wonder if they were pulled?
 
Meacher, Hoban, Spartacus and ATOS

This week something happened which is without precedent in my 40 years of Parliamentary experience. On an issue of acute public importance where there had already been a Parliamentary debate revealing a total cross-party consensus solidly opposed to government policy, a Departmental minister then refused to see a delegation to discuss the matter further and to consider necessary changes in procedure. This issue, the work capability assessments carried out by Atos Healthcare, has been a top-line matter on the political agenda for many months now. I had therefore written to Iain Duncan Smith on 31 January asking him to receive a delegation from some of the key campaigning and analytical groups (I had, regrettably, to restrict this to three). I heard nothing for more than 5 weeks and therefore put down a Parliamentary Question on the Commons Order Paper asking when he proposed to answer my letter. As a result I got an immediate reply from Mark Hoban, the junior minister dealing with Atos matters, saying “my current diary requirements mean I am unable to accept your invitation at this time”. That is simply civil service-speak for a flat No. But I have taken the matter further.

cont'd...

http://www.michaelmeacher.info/webl...frit-of-seeing-delegation-on-atos-healthcare/
 
Iain Dunked-in Shit's behaviour is another fine example of ministers using the false distinction between operational and executive responsibility in order to insulate themselves from any fallout from their policies. They can claim "I'm the minister, I don't have operational control".
Older posters may remember Michael Howard making the same argument almost 20 years ago (and getting asked the same question 13 times by Jeremy Paxman!) with regard to his Prison Services director, Derek Lewis, and the results that Howard's own policies had reaped.
 
According to Lord Freud, the banker-turned-welfare-minister: “The fact that those in work will come under the ambit of the JobCentre Plus for the first time as a result of universal credit gives the government radical new opportunities.” The ComDems have learned their lessons from New Labour in the spin of framing retrogressive steps as ‘radical’. They are boldly going where no poverty profiteer has gone before. However, the government is well aware that the usual divisive rhetoric about benefits robbing ‘the taxpayer’ will be more difficult to direct against people who are already working and paying taxes. Also, many of the workers they aim to harass are organised, belong to unions and have access to resources such as free legal advice. The Cait Reilly case upset IDS so much he threw a spectacular hissy fit. There’ll be many more challenges if the DWP insists on sticking its nose where it’s not meant to go.
Therefore, the DWP and Policy Exchange are asking for suggestions on how to widen the range of their nets to self-employed, part-time and low-paid workers. In a document with the catchy title of “Extending labour market interventions to in-work claimants – call for ideas”, the DWP requests feedback from “employers, behavioural economists, social psychologists, think tanks, welfare to work providers, academics, charities, application designers and those at the sharp end of delivering existing services”. Of course, this call-out doesn’t include those at ‘the sharp end’ of DWP schemes

http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=2347

The Voids website is turning into one of the best campaiging site on the web as is Boycott Workfare, I just read this about U/C and the attempts to draw in millions of self employed and low paid into the net of conditionality/surveillance, etc, what is incredible is the State, through the fundamentalist Lord Freud is positively salivating at the opportunity to penalise and harrass millions of these citizens and put them under the DWP heel, I find it frightening and yes, it does remind you of the old eastern bloc states...

btw, the implications of UC which will affect millions, inc many on here needs its own thread, someone who really knows what it all means.
 
Someone suggested this, not sure who or where. But is it worth starting a Universal Credit thread, for information and support either here or in the protest forum? Only I think it'll be here quicker than you know and I reckon forewarned is forearmed. I don't want to start it :oops: but I reckon it could be useful.
 
Someone suggested this, not sure who or where. But is it worth starting a Universal Credit thread, for information and support either here or in the protest forum? Only I think it'll be here quicker than you know and I reckon forewarned is forearmed. I don't want to start it :oops: but I reckon it could be useful.

Definitely needs its own one as it'll just get buried in ATOS/Welfare Reforms/BT/IDS is a cunt threads
 
Back
Top Bottom