Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

worra massive ~CUNT!!

excellent dodge of living on benefits for a week too! :facepalm:

However, I agree with him here

"The trouble is, it's a stunt when someone like me does it because you do it for a week.

So instead of a stunt, why not make it real and do it for three months, preferably over the winter and see how well you fare when you've the quarterly bills coming in, and let's not forget the water, council tax, tv licence etc.
 
However, I agree with him here



So instead of a stunt, why not make it real and do it for three months, preferably over the winter and see how well you fare when you've the quarterly bills coming in, and let's not forget the water, council tax, tv licence etc.
Not very realistic is it, quarterly bills. He should be given card meters with debts on from the previous tenant and no explanation how they work. Should also only be allowed a non-smart phone and no internet. The phone should be in emergency credit when he gets it, and he should be given a set of shoes that is about to wear out.
 
Not very realistic is it, quarterly bills. He should be given card meters with debts on from the previous tenant and no explanation how they work. Should also only be allowed a non-smart phone and no internet. The phone should be in emergency credit when he gets it, and he should be given a set of shoes that is about to wear out.

Too cruel. He might chuck in the towel and then we'll never get to see him survive the full three months :D
 
However, I agree with him here



So instead of a stunt, why not make it real and do it for three months, preferably over the winter and see how well you fare when you've the quarterly bills coming in, and let's not forget the water, council tax, tv licence etc.

give him some kids to look after too, make sure the period he has to do it for covers school uniform time, a school away trip, Christmas and at least one child's birthday too. And manufacture the washing machine breaking in the middle of that period. Then see how many fucking 'risks' he feels like taking, the cunt
 
give him some kids to look after too, make sure the period he has to do it for covers school uniform time, a school away trip, Christmas and at least one child's birthday too. And manufacture the washing machine breaking in the middle of that period. Then see how many fucking 'risks' he feels like taking, the cunt

:cool::D
 
All of this analysis and information is available. Why then are the government hell bent on ignoring it/spinning it to fit their own narrative?

Rhetorical question. :(
 
The State of welfare

Radio 4

10am

Seventy years ago William Beveridge wrote a report that was to lay the foundations for the welfare state. He identified the Five Giants that society needed to slay: Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor and Idleness. Using archive from the time, Jane Garvey and Julian Worricker take us back to that extraordinary moment in wartime Britain that has proved so pivotal to the shape of the welfare state today. They discuss how well the system serves those who rely it on it now - and those who pay for it. Changing attitudes to those on benefits are reflected in a new BBC-commissioned poll and and we hear three radical visions for how welfare should be provided in the future. There'll be tough debate on fairness, entitlement, rights and compassion with Frank Field, Labour MP, the philosopher Roger Scruton and social commentator Polly Toynbee. The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith will be challenged to outline the philosophy behind his decisions on reforming the welfare state, as well as responding to the views of contributors and listeners.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01p0fpg
 
This is a horrible development :mad:

http://antiworkfare.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/the-return-of-workhouse.html?spref=tw

The proposal offers tenants hit by the Bedroom Tax a deal to make up the shortfall in their rent by working for LMH doing odd jobs such as “litter picking” on LMH estates. Tenants would also be shunted into training (work) programmes with local charities to secure a roof over their heads. Coffey coats the proposed workhouse scheme with a voluntary varnish, but how voluntary is voluntary when it is conditional? Well, it’s not voluntary, at all, when the threat of eviction forces tenants into the scheme

Also this:

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/137633/response/336517/attach/html/4/Adviser Guidance FOI Version 1112.pdf.html

Formal work history is defined as paid work of over 16 hours a week for either
a continuous period of six months, or two blocks that make up six months
(e.g. 2 periods of 3 months, or 1 period of 4 months plus another period of 2
months).
Please Note: work history must be since leaving full-time education – Work
history whilst in full-time education is not relevant

So you could have held down a 2-day a week job for years, possibly at the same time as doing a degree, which surely amply shows ability to time-manage/prioritise/multitask/be responsible and punctual etc etc but these bastards would still tell you you have no experience of work and that you have to go and work for free for 13 weeks 'to gain experience' or lose your benefits. I see it makes mention of covering 'reasonable costs of paid childcare' and children are not mentioned at all in the exemption bits which suggests not being able to find childcare to go on one of these fucking slave labour placements if you're a single parent would get you a sanction.
 
This is a horrible development :mad:

http://antiworkfare.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/the-return-of-workhouse.html?spref=tw



Also this:

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/137633/response/336517/attach/html/4/Adviser Guidance FOI Version 1112.pdf.html



So you could have held down a 2-day a week job for years, possibly at the same time as doing a degree, which surely amply shows ability to time-manage/prioritise/multitask/be responsible and punctual etc etc but these bastards would still tell you you have no experience of work and that you have to go and work for free for 13 weeks 'to gain experience' or lose your benefits. I see it makes mention of covering 'reasonable costs of paid childcare' and children are not mentioned at all in the exemption bits which suggests not being able to find childcare to go on one of these fucking slave labour placements if you're a single parent would get you a sanction.

If you hear of this happening to anyone and it doesn't get overturned on appeal then I'd suggest that would be worth taking to court, I really doubt that the ECHR would allow that to happen.

But yeah the above in all is totally shit - work for your home directly more or less.
 
If you hear of this happening to anyone and it doesn't get overturned on appeal then I'd suggest that would be worth taking to court, I really doubt that the ECHR would allow that to happen.

But yeah the above in all is totally shit - work for your home directly more or less.
And how do you suggest that a claimant gets it taken that far, given the severe cutbacks on what Legal Aid can help you with?
 
And how do you suggest that a claimant gets it taken that far, given the severe cutbacks on what Legal Aid can help you with?

Well, until April 2013 that's not a problem, after then I think you'd find a children's charity who'd take up or pay for the case or I think we'd be able to get a solicitor to do it for free/cheap and fundraise to cover costs. For the most part benefit cases are totally screwed by the legal aid cuts but I think a situation like that above would see organisations/people support the case.. "think of the children, oh won't someone think of the children".
We're basically talking about a situation where someone either leaves their kids at home alone or doesn't have food for them. Barnardo's being the dicks they are probably wouldn't care but others would I reckon.
 
Well, until April 2013 that's not a problem, after then I think you'd find a children's charity who'd take up or pay for the case or I think we'd be able to get a solicitor to do it for free/cheap and fundraise to cover costs. <snip>
We're basically talking about a situation where someone either leaves their kids at home alone or doesn't have food for them. Barnardo's being the dicks they are probably wouldn't care but others would I reckon.
Even so, that's nothing to rely on. Benefit payment is often stopped while you appeal - what does the claimant live on 'til then? foodbanks don't cover the rent or fuel bills.
 
:mad:

http://www.tesco.com/foodbank/

@boycottworkfare I guess the plan is that people will buy food from Tesco to give to food banks for people who work at Tesco

@boycottworkfare Tesco also has plenty of free labour; maybe if they paid people wages there wouldn't be as much a need for food banks.

Are tescos still involved in Workfare?

*goes to check

Tesco are still involved in the scheme

http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?page_id=16

Maximising profit at every level... Every little helps. :facepalm:
 
Back
Top Bottom