Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

Give Up Work To Attend Workfare Say New DWP Guidelines

Posted on November 11, 2012 by johnny void | 52 Comments
Benefit claimants who are working part time could be forced to give up work to attend workfare new documents from the DWP suggest. Those who refuse will face the highest levels of benefit sanctions which could see some claimants stripped of support for up to three years.
The Provider Guidance for the Mandatory Work Activity (MWA) scheme has recently been updated and is now available online (PDF). MWA is four weeks workfare for community based organisations and functions as a form of Community Service for claimants who are judged to be not trying hard enough to find work. Already the scheme is mired in difficulties, with major charities pulling out and the DWP desperately trying to cover up details of the programme.
What has not been publicly announced is that the DWP expects some part time workers to also be sentenced to the scheme. When Universal Credit is introduced, allegedly next year, part time workers will be expected to constantly look for more work or better paid work in order to receive in work benefits such as Child Tax Credits and Housing Benefits.
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/give-up-work-workfare-new-dwp-guidelines/
 
Really good RSA type animation vid from the Barnet Alliance against cuts and outsourcing in Barnet:



Barnet Eye blog:

http://www.barneteye.blogspot.co.uk/


A radical plan by Barnet's 'easyCouncil' local authority to outsource most of its functions under the motto of One Barnet is meeting growing resistance from residents, most of whom have never been involved in politics or activism. John Harris meet the bloggers, parents and business owners in suburban north London who are leading what has been called the 'Barnet spring'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentis...tsourcing-easycouncil-revolt-video?CMP=twt_gu
 
Supreme Court paves way for ‘bedroom tax’ appeal



Published by Ross Macmillan for 24dash.com in Housing and also in Central Government, Local Government, Universal Credit

Friday 16th November 2012 - 10:56am
580_Image_supreme_court.jpg


Supreme Court paves way for ‘bedroom tax’ appeal
The Supreme Court has granted the Government permission to challenge a ruling which held that the housing benefit regulations discriminate against disabled people - a move which could have implications for the so-called ‘bedroom tax’ set to hit social tenants from next April.

http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2012-11-16-Supreme-Court-paves-way-for-bedroom-tax-appeal
 

The universal jobmatch thing is sounding like a nightmare. From what I understand/remember at the moment it's not mandatory, but it will become so at some point.
Somehow every job is going to be listed here so they can keep track of what people are doing and stop them from lying. Check you've done the applications you've said etc.
Also will make you apply for jobs that match your skill set, and you have to accept a job you've been offered, which could see tradespeople / skilled positions being offered for less than the going rate and people being forced to accept or no benefits.

I don't get how they reckon every job will be on there though, that won't be possible, aside from unadvertised jobs, will stuff like the TUC, jobs.ac.uk or arts job mailing lists get incorporated? Will they accept these things once universal jobmatch is running or will you be required to do a certain amount through their system?
If it's going to be done online they'll be able to track exactly what pages you look at, for how long etc.. it'll become harder to game the system (though not impossible by any means and perhaps some friendly hacktivists will write a robot that people can leave to look through the universal jobmatch site and pretend to be a real person..
The issue with this is that under universal credit you're going to be required to do 30 hours/wk of jobsearch (iirc, maybe 35). Now that's pretty difficult to do every week.. unless you "volunteer".
You'll be able to volunteer for 16 hours / week and this will count towards your jobsearch requirements. Don't make your 30 hours/week and you'll get sanctioned. Don't volunteer and you'll find it hard to make your 30 hours.
Workfare.. but more voluntary than it is now. Still effectively mandatory, still effectively meaning you'll get sanctioned if you don't volunteer (through the job centre obviously, which may mean going to private companies if a work placement there would be more suitable to helping someone to gain the experience they need to find work). But technically voluntary.

Anyway, I'd be planning to spend time finding job lists/boards that are not part of universal job match and claiming I'd read through lots of person specs just to check because I wasn't sure from the job title...

caveat: all this is still kind of up in the air as UC rules are not exactly clear at the moment. The scenario above hasn't been clarified enough to know if it's true.. and hopefuly UC is going to fail due to IT anyway.
 
Tomorrow. 19th Nov.
http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=11821

3.15pm Public Accounts
Subject: Contract Management of Medical Services (ATOS)
Witness(es): Neil Coyle, Policy Director, Disability UK and Gillian Guy, Chief Executive, Citizens Advice Bureau; Robert Devereux, Permanent Secretary, Department for Work and Pensions and Dr Bill Gunnyeon CBE, Chief Medical Adviser and Director for Health and Wellbeing, Department for Work and Pensions
Location: The Grimond Room, Portcullis House
 
Just met this lady in an online group, she met the shadow health minister last week and talked about ATOS:

I was lucky to meet with Shadow Minister last week who told a delegation of campaigners (inc myself) what I personally had suspected for some time, Atos are the governments scapegoats for failure, rather than the Government/DWP taking responsibility for an assessment process which was already flawed, being made worse by someone at the helm who threw caution to the wind, ignored the need for an impact assessment and by any means necessary was going to remove the vital support that people needed and who change regulations like they change their underwear. Atos Dr’s ,Nurses etc are not able to use the skills they trained years for,but are now Disability Analysts. The welfare of the Sick and Disabled do not come into it, if you can work one day a week then this is what they will say,this process IS NOT A MEDICAL that many believe it is in fact a programme to work regardless of levels ability to do so,where it is possible. I know many will be outraged by these comments but that is the stark truth,I’m not going to dress it up or give you a sticky plaster for it. It is now costing more in appeals than to implement the test itself, a 9 month wait on DLA alone for appeals.

http://blueannoyed.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/atos-saint-or-sinner/

Her and other attendees will be releasing a report asap.
 
Southwark
Defend Council Housing
Public Meeting



The Housing Commission:
A bleak future?

Defend Council Housing wants Southwark to retain all 39,000 of its Council houses. This can be done by implementing one of the three options put forward by the Housing Commission. The Commission's report also exposes the privatizers as people who want to waste public money, push up housing costs and drive ordinary people out of the borough. Come to the meeting to discuss how to retain our housing and build a Council house or flat for everyone who needs one.


St Paul's Church Hall, Lorrimore Square, off Carter Street, Walworth Road, SE17

Saturday, November 24, 3pm to 5pm

Speakers include:


Eileen Short, national chair of Defend Council Housing

Julian Jackson, Southwark DCH,


Sally Causer, Southwark Legal Advice Network


Contact Southwark DCH by emailing fairymill@gmail.
 
Just met this lady in an online group, she met the shadow health minister last week and talked about ATOS:



http://blueannoyed.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/atos-saint-or-sinner/

Her and other attendees will be releasing a report asap.
My comment on her post. We've known each other online for well over a year. One of the other women that was at the meeting is such a Labourite that she truly believes Labour are going to ride in like knights in shitey armour and save the day for all sick and disabled to rounds of applause and streets full of tickertape. :facepalm: I think Gail spent too long in her company on the train journey home.
Sad to say Gail I think you’ve been spun a Labour line from Anne McGuire and taken the hook. Atos are more than just DWP patsys in that they wrote the Lima software with the assistant knowledge base from their Disability denying cohorts UNUM and aided by the Mansell/Aylward school of biopsychobabble.
Atos could have, and still can, withdraw from the WCA/PIP assessments given they know what the public feeling is about them. They won’t though. That £40 million profit from the £110 million a year from the Government, ie US says it all.
Which other private business working in the UK would stay so quiet in the face of such a public and media clamour over the deaths tallied to these assessments so far. They are part and parcel of this deadly and dangerous farce.
What I see in your article is another side to the politics of division. A way to spin you into the Labour side while being given no assurance that any real change will happen if Labour regain control. Atos may be the scythe of the Tory Reaper, but, it’s doing a damn fine job of keeping it’s edges keen.
 
"I think we have a dreadful welfare system"

Poor people not taking enough risks apparently. This despite the fact they "have nothing to lose".

"You know, the incapacity benefits, the lone parents, the people who are self-employed for year after year and only earn hundreds of pounds or a few thousand pounds, the people waiting for their work ability assessment then not going to it - all kinds of areas where people are able to have a lifestyle off benefits and actually off conditionality."
 
worra massive ~CUNT!!

excellent dodge of living on benefits for a week too! :facepalm:
Lord Freud dismissed the possibility of taking part in a television documentary which filmed him living on benefits for a week, something a number of politicians have done in the past.
"I have thought of the issue," he said. "The trouble is, it's a stunt when someone like me does it because you do it for a week. That's not the point."
He added: "I think you don't have to be the corpse to go to a funeral, which is the implied criticism there."
 
he's an over-entitled smug bellend. Good analogy too, because the mourners are at the funeral temporarily, by choice, and could leave whenever they want. The corpse didn't get a say in the matter and is stuck there.
 
Back
Top Bottom