Interesting, could you please elaborate?I’ve been doing electronically signed (contract and TR1) purchases and sales for over 2 years now?
Interesting, could you please elaborate?
Ah, so I think the distinction here is that limited companies tend to play by different rules to private individuals.One of my jobs was/is to help sort out and oversee the administration of a company whose business is buying and selling houses. I built them a database and systems etc and implemented electronic signing of all documents (Docusign) to take out one of the main bottlenecks, which was getting physical paper documents signed and in the right place at the right time. I’d estimate they’ve done over 200 transactions like that now. Once or twice (literally) in that time the solicitors on the other side (for there’s always another side to each transaction obviously) have insisted on ‘wet ink’, but for the vast bulk it’s been no problem at all.
I know this company is far from unique in this as well, so I thought I’d mention it in response to someone above saying something like “the first all-electronically signed transaction has recently completed”, as that didn’t accord with my experience.
I was a bit inaccurate I guess when I said “I’ve been doing…” though. Not me personally!
Ah, so I think the distinction here is that limited companies tend to play by different rules to private individuals.
Very interesting, I hope docusign becomes the standard in future it would save everyone a lot of hassle.
How do you get electronic witnesses, do the purchasers need someone hanging over their shoulder when they docusign?Ah…. I think I’ve found the source of the confusion:
First electronically signed property deal goes through
Top-100 firm Hugh James is first to submit qualified electronic signature, which does not require witnessing.www.lawgazette.co.uk
Although the title of that article says “first electronically signed property deal…” what it actually means is first electronically signed transfer deed without a witness, which is a different thing.
It also contains a spokesperson for docusign claiming “transfer of title took 24 hours rather than 6-8 weeks”, which is a disingenuous and meaningless claim. Transfer of title is usually very fast. The 6-8 weeks is all the preparation work, none of which is obviated by the removal of a witness’s signature…
How do you get electronic witnesses, do the purchasers need someone hanging over their shoulder when they docusign?
Insurance policy has now appeared - but the wrong house number for the new house. Pretty certain it’s not my error…
Anyway sounds like the insurer are getting their arse in gear
I think between me and the insurer we’ve made a right mess of itHave they not emailed you a confirmation? It sounds very complicated.
Insurance documents sent to solicitor.
Now to find out what “exchange is imminent” really means
It'll be like when a builder tells you that the work will take 2 weeks.
Looks like they are going out of business or something. Avoid like the plague.What does this mean? Just looked the removal company up on companies house
View attachment 326206
Is it suspicious?
Tbf , I had a new roof put on last year , prompted by my previous downstairs neighbour selling up & me telling her we needed the roof done (as the leaks mostly affected us) She wasn't happy , and ended up dropping the price for her share , £12k) but the roofers were fucking excellent and did it on time .It'll be like when a builder tells you that the work will take 2 weeks.
Yes!! Tomorrow!! Am quite stressed, suddenly. The blissful ignorance of the FTB has given way to breakdowns over the vendor wanting an extra 3 hours to send a cleaner in. One hand, I want it clean, other hand I JWTFK
Good luck to you
I would definitely take the free clean!