so its fine then why would anyone complain about being sent to bangladesh if their gran was from there yeah.
Are you conceding on the point of law and want to discuss the morality instead?
so its fine then why would anyone complain about being sent to bangladesh if their gran was from there yeah.
Yep. This is how the law is now framed. They're extending their reach all the time.I went out of my way to get the passport yes, it was quite a lot of work, but this law doesn't care about that, its irrelevant, they could try to send me to the slovak republic without any of that, long as the home sec and her lawyers believed i was 'eligible'.
You are arguing exactly that in the case of Shamima Begum. She didn't even know about her putative Bangladeshi citizenship.
And now you have BIG on your side. Hooray!
That's the whole point. It's why this punishment can only be dealt to some brits and not others. Which is the issue we are discussing. I wonder what its like to be you, so stupid and so self assured.Are you conceding on the point of law and want to discuss the morality instead?
I went out of my way to get the passport yes, it was quite a lot of work, but this law doesn't care about that, its irrelevant, they could try to send me to the slovak republic without any of that, long as the home sec and her lawyers believed i was 'eligible'.
That's the whole point. It's why this punishment can only be dealt to some brits and not others. Which is the issue we are discussing. You're too thick to bother with.
The latest reframing of this law only came into effect last year. Give them time.Back to this again. Can you show us some examples of that having happened ever?
The latest reframing of this law only came into effect last year. Give them time.
i am telling you what the law says ffs. An example is Begum.Back to this again. Can you show us some examples of that having happened ever?
'Only start worrying about the negative consequences of having rights taken away once those negative consequences have happened.'Be sure to let me know when it happens.
What was the change?The latest reframing of this law only came into effect last year. Give them time.
'Only start worrying about the negative consequences of having rights taken away once those negative consequences have happened.'
You're as thick as BIG on this subject.
i am telling you what the law says ffs. An example is Begum.
And that's what you're reduced to. Liking posts by the reactionary idiot, BIG.
That's the whole point. It's why this punishment can only be dealt to some brits and not others. Which is the issue we are discussing. I wonder what its like to be you, so stupid and so self assured.
'Only start worrying about the negative consequences of having rights taken away once those negative consequences have happened.'
You're as thick as BIG on this subject.
I know he doesnt really mean it, this 'if it was a problem you'd be able to show me a past example of it happening' but even the lazy pretence of it from spy here i find unreasonably annoying. I think its because if my grandparents had thought like that and not legged it when they saw which way the wind was blowing i wouldnt have got to exist. So its not just faux naive its kind of offensively naive.'Only start worrying about the negative consequences of having rights taken away once those negative consequences have happened.'
I do, absolutely. Not that that's what happened here.Throughout this thread people have been conflating the legality and the morality.
Do you believe that those that acquire British citizenship after moving to this country as an adult should then have that citizenship regardless of their actions?
Not sure the post I made that Bimble was addressing in any way referred to you though?It's quite annoying to be repeatedly told what I think by people who I've repeatedly told outright what I'm thinking and yet still get it wrong. It's almost as though what they're actually arguing with is the spectres in their own minds.
You and Spymaster have repeatedly referred to the "left" view. Well I'm left, and so's everyone else arguing against Begum's treatment on this thread. Not one of us has professed ourselves relaxed about the prospect of fascists being stripped of their citizenship. So unless you and Spymaster have some evidence you can stop bollocking on as though it's a real point.Not sure the post I made that Bimble was addressing in any way referred to you though?
I do, absolutely. Not that that's what happened here.
It’s more an annoyance I have with liberals than ‘the left’ as one homogeneous block. You argue persuasively but my points aimed at others remain right tbh.You and Spymaster have repeatedly referred to the "left" view. Well I'm left, and so's everyone else arguing against Begum's treatment on this thread. Not one of us has professed ourselves relaxed about the prospect of fascists being stripped of their citizenship. So unless you and Spymaster have some evidence you can stop bollocking on as though it's a real point.
It doesn't matter whether her crime is terrorism or stealing sweets, the law is imposing specific politicised outcomes weighted against particular minorities.
You and Spymaster have repeatedly referred to the "left" view. Well I'm left, and so's everyone else arguing against Begum's treatment on this thread. Not one of us has professed ourselves relaxed about the prospect of fascists being stripped of their citizenship. So unless you and Spymaster have some evidence you can stop bollocking on as though it's a real point.
Missed this. Glad our anti-fascist views align.I would not, at any stage, be in favour of stripping British nationality from Nick Griffin and inflicting the slimy prick on anyone else. This goes for every evil bastard this country's produced, from Nigel Farage to David Copeland. Spymaster and Magnus McGinty please take very specific note of the previous two sentences, which I have put in bold in case your problem is poor eyesight.
Not (on current evidence) if they don't join proscribed groups.
He's just pretending to believe that as long as you make sure not to join ISIS you'll be fine. If you and your grannies are all 100% british that's different, you can go ahead and join them no problem.How do you know its only be used in terrorism cases?
I would not, at any stage, be in favour of stripping British nationality from Nick Griffin and inflicting the slimy prick on anyone else. This goes for every evil bastard this country's produced, from Nigel Farage to David Copeland. Spymaster and Magnus McGinty please take very specific note of the previous two sentences, which I have put in bold in case your problem is poor eyesight.
You fucking what.Not (on current evidence) if they don't join proscribed groups.
Where I would partially agree is that the government should make very clear indeed, the potential pitfalls of dual nationality, and also ensure that UK citizens are aware of the jus sanguinis principle of citizenship.
That way anyone wishing to go off to fight for murderous rape cults in future can relinquish their non-Brit status first and not get themselves into this mess.