Fair enough. It would be better if they had to convince a court at least.Oh yeh cos cops are honest and truthful
Fair enough. It would be better if they had to convince a court at least.Oh yeh cos cops are honest and truthful
Yes they could save more lives by paying nurses enough so they don't have to eat from food banks!You'd hope so, wouldn't you. But going by the abysmal job they've been doing on that front for years and years maybe it isn't their main job after all
I think you need to reassess what the main job of the government isYes they could save more lives by paying nurses enough so they don't have to eat from food banks!
In theory, yes (as Pickman's notes, in practice is somewhat different). It is not my job, however, to encourage the government in its tendency to treat people who happen to have been born on the wrong side of the Channel (or indeed on this side but with the wrong parents) as though their lives are worth less than ours.the British governments main job is to protect British people.
Appreciate the sentiment here but i don't feel offended by the word cunt tbh. The amount of posters who are fine with my citizenship being provisional according to the judgement of Suella Braverman is properly disconcerting though.Let's stop calling her a cunt. Because she won't see it, but women who want to engage with the thread will.
It doesn't have to be an either or. I'm in the same boat as you but a bit weirded out by middle aged men calling a young woman a cunt. This puts me off engaging with the discussion around the weaponsation of citizenship loopholes, which I was also directly affected by in my late teens, like the young woman we're discussing and like those kids who went missing in Brighton recently. People called me a cunt when I was going through that too.Appreciate the sentiment here but i don't feel offended by the word cunt tbh. The amount of posters who are fine with my citizenship being provisional according to the judgement of Suella Braverman is properly disconcerting though.
Agreed. The C-word has always been an Urban staple but that doesn't mean it's not creepy and weird in certain contexts.It doesn't have to be an either or. I'm in the same boat as you but a bit weirded out by middle aged men calling a young woman a cunt. This puts me off engaging with the discussion around the weaponsation of citizenship loopholes, which I was also directly affected by in my late teens, like the young woman we're discussing and like those kids who went missing in Brighton recently. People called me a cunt when I was going through that too.
My mum took the traditional feminist line that it was offensive to women to use it as an insult. But in fact this meant that she only used it when she was really angry making the effect that she was claiming even worse. She's 81 this year and about a year ago she called some old fella on her residents committee a cunt to his face. I couldn't have been prouder.Yeah it’s useful to know that it isn’t always appropriate. My dad gave me a good hiding when I was young and called him it (in jest) but nowadays it’s pretty common parlance and my mother is unfazed when I point to the telly and call someone it.
It comes from the same place as the bullshit legal semantics we've seen play out, just different people have different weapons or methods at their disposal. It's about hatred, punching down, and an element of theatre in the vein of "look at the power I/we have". In all of this, people going for Begum are playing up to the camera.yeah, the language just feels part of the general messed up obsession with begum tbh.
Somehow Britain managed to survive for 30 years between 1973 and 2003 without stripping a single person of UK citizenship. Now they number hundreds per year.Do you just disagree with it full stop. Are there any circumstances when you think it's OK? Like if the police were 100% sure they wanted to set off a bomb.
That's fucking nasty.Thread should be moved to Worldwide forum, the cunt isnt a British citizen any more.
and doesnt even live here
There are differences. For starters, Letts was aware that he was a dual national and has not been left stateless. For seconders, he was in his 20s when he went to join Daesh.
But I don't agree with the stripping of his nationality either, now you ask. The change in the law in 2003 to allow this to be done to people who are citizens by birth was a thoroughly bad thing.
Thread should be moved to Worldwide forum, the cunt isnt a British citizen any more.
and doesnt even live here
The amount of posters who are fine with my citizenship being provisional according to the judgement of Suella Braverman is properly disconcerting though.
the difference is you clearly have a lot of faith in suella braverman and i dont.I’m in the same boat as you but am not the slightest bit disconcerted because I don’t intend to join a genocidal rape cult. If I did, I’d simply renounce my non-British citizenship.
the difference is you clearly have a lot of faith in suella braverman and i dont.
If you've nothing to hide you've nothing to fear all over again.You don’t need faith in her to feel secure about not being made stateless unless you’re planning some serious silliness and you’re not really worried about it at all, are you?
If you've nothing to hide you've nothing to fear all over again.
I don't think that'd make the blindest bit of difference, the government of the day would say a) you could potentially be an Irish national and b) you were deliberately making yourself stateless and the consequences were down to your actionsI’m in the same boat as you but am not the slightest bit disconcerted because I don’t intend to join a genocidal rape cult. If I did, I’d simply renounce my non-British citizenship.
I don't think that'd make the blindest bit of difference, the government of the day would say a) you could potentially be an Irish national and b) you were deliberately making yourself stateless and the consequences were down to your actions