people's endless fascination with her is amazing, i wonder if she's got a book deal yet.
Bearing in mind she’s not been to court and is therefore currently innocent, she could keep the earnings too.
people's endless fascination with her is amazing, i wonder if she's got a book deal yet.
And then buy a ticket to Panama and live on a beach drinking pina coladas at which point every cunt would want her back and hung.Bearing in mind she’s not been to court and is therefore currently innocent, she could keep the earnings too.
Probably wouldn't have to pay income tax.Bearing in mind she’s not been to court and is therefore currently innocent, she could keep the earnings too.
Camp might start charging rent though.Probably wouldn't have to pay income tax.
And then buy a ticket to Panama and live on a beach drinking pina coladas at which point every cunt would want her back and hung.
They struggled with Ronnie Biggs. They’ll have to wait until her money runs out and she gets cancer.Pfft!
We could send an unobtrusive MI6 operative round to get that sorted quietly and cheaply.
They struggled with Ronnie Biggs. They’ll have to wait until her money runs out and she gets cancer.
Is this an episode of Spooks or something?Pfft!
We could send an unobtrusive MI6 operative round to get that sorted quietly and cheaply.
Obviously. That's only when they're slagging off other people running agentsHa, this quote by the head of the Met Counter-Terrorism Unit in the article above: '“If you are running agents, you are acquiescing to what they are doing. You are turning a blind eye to their actions because it is being trumped by a rich vein of intelligence.” - I don't recall them following that line during the SpyCops scandal, oddly enough.
possibly nonesense but pretty wild claims nonetheless being reported in the Times, de-paywalled here>
Shamima Begum ‘was smuggled into Syria by western spy’ | News | The T…
archived 30 Aug 2022 18:17:45 UTCarchive.ph
articles claims shamima and her mate were smuggled into Syria by a double agent who was working for both ISIS and Canadian intelligence
Thinking about it she could become a poster girl and star for Afghanistan. Until they ban telly again.
Same way they were complicit in paramilitary murders in Northern Ireland, I’d imagine: operatives embedded in the organisations doing stuff with the full knowledge and support of superiors.Does he explain exactly how the UK was “complicit” in smuggling people into Syria to support IS?
Same way they were complicit in paramilitary murders in Northern Ireland, I’d imagine: operatives embedded in the organisations doing stuff with the full knowledge and support of superiors.
I know nothing of this guy, his credibility, or his evidence. All I'm saying is that it's entirely believable that if the UK security services had infiltrated an Islamist sect, or a people-smuggling operation, their operatives would take part in the activities in the full knowledge of basically the UK state. That's very much how it works. There's any number of credible histories of various spheres you could consult. I see no reason to believe IS and Syria would be any different.Like what, in the case of smuggling Begum to IS?
This chap seems to have some information that few others are aware of. Does he lay it out somewhere or are we just expected to believe him?
If the UK didn't have agents (not officers) inside ISIS I'd want my (tax) money back. Doesn't mean they had any degree of control, I doubt they were anywhere near as embedded as in the later stages of the Irish campaign. This opinion just based on the time lines and lack of the close links there were Northern Ireland.I know nothing of this guy, his credibility, or his evidence. All I'm saying is that it's entirely believable that if the UK security services had infiltrated an Islamist sect, or a people-smuggling operation, their operatives would take part in the activities in the full knowledge of basically the UK state. That's very much how it works. There's any number of credible histories of various spheres you could consult. I see no reason to believe IS and Syria would be any different.
I know nothing of this guy, his credibility, or his evidence. All I'm saying is that it's entirely believable that if the UK security services had infiltrated an Islamist sect, or a people-smuggling operation, their operatives would take part in the activities in the full knowledge of basically the UK state. That's very much how it works. There's any number of credible histories of various spheres you could consult. I see no reason to believe IS and Syria would be any different.
I don't know the details. But it's not beyond belief they were more involved than is currently alleged.I've just been reading about Sabir and downloaded his book, although that's about something else. The allegation seems to be that a guy who was involved in the transport operation was also supplying intelligence to the Canadian embassy in Jordan, some of which may have been shared with British security services, including the names and addresses of people smuggled. That's intelligence gathering, not complicity in the smuggling of people.
If the operative who smuggled her to IS was a double agent, that doesn't affect her agency compared to being smuggled by a non-double agent. It does, however, reflect something on the nature of the operations if they were happy to participate in the recruitment of 15-year-olds. It means that she was sacrificed to a larger cause. It means, regardless of her agency, that the UK owes her something.If the UK didn't have agents (not officers) inside ISIS I'd want my (tax) money back. Doesn't mean they had any degree of control, I doubt they were anywhere near as embedded as in the later stages of the Irish campaign.
I'm still interested at why so many people seem to want to deny Shamima Begum her agency in this?
If the operative who smuggled her to IS was a double agent, that doesn't affect her agency compared to being smuggled by a non-double agent. It does, however, reflect something on the nature of the operations if they were happy to participate in the recruitment of 15-year-olds. It means that she was sacrificed to a larger cause. It means, regardless of her agency, that the UK owes her something.
Not saying I think this is what happened, but like danny, I would say that it is the sort of thing that does happen.
I wouldn't judge the extent of involvement to need to be very large for the UK to have to take some responsibility for what happened. Simply knowing about the smuggling and failing to stop it because stopping it would have blown agents' cover would be enough - it would mean that Begum and others were sacrificed to the larger cause when they could have been stopped.Profiting from information supplied about things beyond your control doesn't make you complicit in those acts. Wilhelm Canaris supplied information to British security services throughout 1943 and 1944. That doesn't make the British government complicit in the Holocaust. What Sabir has alluded to there, is UK and Canadian involvement in the smuggling of Begum to IS, to the extent that her citizenship should be restored. He needs to show us what he alleges he knows.
If the operative who smuggled her to IS was a double agent, that doesn't affect her agency compared to being smuggled by a non-double agent. It does, however, reflect something on the nature of the operations if they were happy to participate in the recruitment of 15-year-olds. It means that she was sacrificed to a larger cause. It means, regardless of her agency, that the UK owes her something.
Not saying I think this is what happened, but like danny, I would say that it is the sort of thing that does happen.
I disagree with that, but even if I didn’t, it’s quite a high bar you’ve set there. That UK security services knew that Begum, specifically, was being trafficked, and could have prevented it. At the moment we have the word of a Muslim academic and campaigner, on Twitter. Let’s see more evidence.I wouldn't judge the extent of involvement to need to be very large for the UK to have to take some responsibility for what happened. Simply knowing about the smuggling and failing to stop it because stopping it would have blown agents' cover would be enough - it would mean that Begum and others were sacrificed to the larger cause when they could have been stopped.
Isn't the claim that the UK became aware she'd gone to Syria, through intel shared by Canada, provided by the Canadian agent who helped her get there, after the fact?