Idris2002
canadian girlfriend
Ah, M. Yaxley-Lennon. Maintenant, je comprends.C'est qui, pas quoi, c'est Tommy.
Ah, M. Yaxley-Lennon. Maintenant, je comprends.C'est qui, pas quoi, c'est Tommy.
She's nineteen now but she was Fifteen when she left. But whichever age, young men in that cohort also do things that they would not do when they're older. You don't have to go to Syria to know that, just look at the society you live in now or the one you grew up in yourself.If she was a 19 yo man, would your views be different?
Of course they do, but that doesn't mean they are let off for acts carried out when they were irresponsible teens. I don't want to condemn or write off this woman for life, but I also don't want to downplay the utterly despicable nature of both her beliefs and her actions. The fact she was there as a child bearer rather than an active fighter doesn't diminish her responsibility much in my book. Two different roles while acting for the same cause.She's nineteen now but she was Fifteen when she left. But whichever age, young men in that cohort also do things that they would not do when they're older. You don't have to go to Syria to know that, just look at the society you live in now or the one you grew up in yourself.
She's nineteen now but she was Fifteen when she left. But whichever age, young men in that cohort also do things that they would not do when they're older. You don't have to go to Syria to know that, just look at the society you live in now or the one you grew up in yourself.
I'm having similar trouble with this tack.
Additionally, she was there for 4 years. So over 18 for at least one of them. She openly states that the reason for her leaving was because life had become rather uncomfortable. Not because she disagreed with what IS were doing.Of course they do, but that doesn't mean they are let off for acts carried out when they were irresponsible teens. I don't want to condemn or write off this woman for life, but I also don't want to downplay the utterly despicable nature of both her beliefs and her actions. The fact she was there as a child bearer rather than an active fighter doesn't diminish her responsibility much in my book. Two different roles while acting for the same cause.
You're just repeating the same tosh over and over.... it isn't obvously all that clear cut what offence she has commited simply by going out there and getting married and living on the front line.
It's clear morally imo. But it's also clear legally. A while back the govt went out of its way to stress that anyone going to Syria to join up with ISIS was committing a criminal offence. Well that's exactly what she did.You're just repeating the same tosh over and over.
It is perfectly clear to pretty much everyione else.
Totally.But it's also clear legally.
I'm not actually trying to get her off. Just pointing out that it isn't obviously all that clear cut what offence she has committed simply by going out there and getting married and living on the front line.
When the three teenagers from Bethnal Green in east London travelled to Syria, their parents were assured by senior police that they were unlikely to be prosecuted for terrorist offences.
Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, and Sir Mark Rowley, the force’s head of counterterrorism, agreed that the girls would be “returning to their families” if they decided to come back. “We have no evidence that these three girls are responsible for any terrorist offences. They have no reason to fear, if nothing else comes to light, that we will treat them as terrorists,” Sir Mark told the Commons home affairs select committee in March 2015.
Can anyone access the Times piece:
Analysis: Will the Isis brides be prosecuted?
The teaser suggests that it might point to some of the issues.
And a cult like Aum Shinrikiyo, routed though it has been, still has enough adherents to be a threat:There is a difference between voluntarily getting back home because you realised you've made a terrible mistake and having to leave because your cult has been utterly routed and you've nowhere else to go.
There is a difference between voluntarily getting back home because you realised you've made a terrible mistake and having to leave because your cult has been utterly routed and you've nowhere else to go.
I honestly don't have a solid opinion on this because of her age really. Although i will say the suggestion that she just needs therapy and healing is probably naive given she seems pretty clear in her head re the righteousness of heads in bins. Just watched this in the news, she said a lot more than is represented in the piece, seems to regret a bit. Also her man was twice her age so that's abuse,and yeah 19 is still a bairn really. Very difficult.
And yes, would be just as conflicted if she' d joined the national front.
But he didn't say come back and all will be foregiven, he said 'We have no evidence that these three girls are responsible for any terrorist offences.' This was only one month after their arrival and a lot happened in the meantime, but still it does point to the fact that marrying a criminal and having their kids isn't generally an offence in and of itself.
I think that's a perfectly reasonable and decent position to hold. If she gets back to the UK it should be a case of hope for the best but prepare for the worst.
Fair point but presumably he said that at a time when they were still trying to coax her back. I think there's little chance she wouldn't end up in court now, as you say - things have moved on.
They have, but those conversations will be remembered.
There's posters of them in every school these days.
Children have to learn them.
They have, but those conversations will be remembered.
I don't think they'll give much of a shit.
There were cases when they said the same to families of young men who had joined IS. They came back to find themselves locked up all the same.
hhhaahhahahahha
Yeah, I think the point being that it didn't do wonders for trust in the British state for those who had gone out there and immediately regretted it. More importantly it didn't really help for trust in the British state for the families and communities that had worked hard to get them back. Almost like a recruiting tool in itself.
Boo hoo.Yeah, I think the point being that it didn't do wonders for trust in the British state for those who had gone out there and immediately regretted it. More importantly it didn't really help for trust in the British state for the families and communities that had worked hard to get them back.