Yes, we don't have to choose when apportioning blame, there's plenty to go around: our leading scientists and doctors enlisted the British people in a grotesque medical experiment they knew would lead to tens of thousands of deaths; and instead of seeking alternative advice, the cabinet signed off on it.No, because the epidemiological advice accepted by the cabinet was that the herd immunity policy would cost at least 100,000 additional lives (a massive underestimate according to later modelling). Whether that was a price worth paying was a purely political decision, not a question of listening to experts.
No, because the epidemiological advice accepted by the cabinet was that the herd immunity policy would cost at least 100,000 additional lives (a massive underestimate according to later modelling). Whether that was a price worth paying was a purely political decision, not a question of listening to experts.
I think a silver lining of this whole thing is that the people who actually matter will be valued a whole lot fucking more after this eventually dies down. It's a total paradigm shift.
My point stands. Boris Johnson was a mediocre journalist, turned (fuck knows how exactly) a very successful politican. Not a doctor. He was advised by the most senior doctors in the country. What do you suggest his motive was to adopt the herd immunity policy exactly? That he wanted to kill people?
My point stands. Boris Johnson was a mediocre journalist, turned (fuck knows how exactly) a very successful politican. Not a doctor. He was advised by the most senior doctors in the country. What do you suggest his motive was to adopt the herd immunity policy exactly? That he wanted to kill people?
Cummings was in his ear. You know what Cummings said don't you?
Just for the record like...we haven't had a PM die in office since Palmerston in 1865.
He had a duty to seek out opinions widely. His most senior doctors, for instance, were saying things that were dismaying senior doctors and epidemiologists of other countries. His job was to interrogate them and find out why they disagreed with one another. In the end this was a political decision to make. And yes, he is a mediocre person in every conceivable way, totally ill-equipped for any kind of leadership role, as he has demonstrated in every leadership role he has ever held. But 'I'm really shit at this' isn't an excuse when you've schemed to get yourself into the position to do 'this'.My point stands. Boris Johnson was a mediocre journalist, turned (fuck knows how exactly) a very successful politican. Not a doctor. He was advised by the most senior doctors in the country. What do you suggest his motive was to adopt the herd immunity policy exactly? That he wanted to kill people?
That killing people was preferable to placing restrictions on economic activity. His stupidity (and that of the cabinet) is that there wasn't really a choice about restricting the economy, because the pandemic would have done it anyway. His moral failing was his disregard for life.My point stands. Boris Johnson was a mediocre journalist, turned (fuck knows how exactly) a very successful politican. Not a doctor. He was advised by the most senior doctors in the country. What do you suggest his motive was to adopt the herd immunity policy exactly? That he wanted to kill people?
He had a duty to seek out opinions widely. His most senior doctors, for instance, were saying things that were dismaying senior doctors and epidemiologists of other countries. His job was to interrogate them and find out why they disagreed with one another. In the end this was a political decision to make. And yes, he is a mediocre person in every conceivable way, totally ill-equipped to any kind of leadership role, as he has demonstrated in every leadership role he has ever held. But 'I'm really shit at this' isn't an excuse when you've schemed to get yourself into the position to do 'this'.
That bit where he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch than agree to a brexit extension might age quite badly
Do you know for a fact who gave what advice and how the decisions were made?My point stands. Boris Johnson was a mediocre journalist, turned (fuck knows how exactly) a very successful politican. Not a doctor. He was advised by the most senior doctors in the country. What do you suggest his motive was to adopt the herd immunity policy exactly? That he wanted to kill people?
That killing people was preferable to placing restrictions on economic activity. His stupidity (and that of the cabinet) is that there wasn't really a choice about restricting the economy, because the pandemic would have done it anyway. His moral failing was his disregard for life.
They don't get off scott free. There is a lot of blame to go around, after all. But Johnson has to be held to account for the decisions - that's what being the elected representative means. In addition, whatever hateful shit Cummings said, Cummings didn't make those decisions either. Johnson did.Sure, I get that. I agree, seeing him standing next to the chancellor in those first few briefings was toe-curling. He was totally uninformed and kept deferring to Rishi who seemed to actually know what was going on. He should be nowhere near No. 10. But I think the real culprits here are the 'experts'. Neil Ferguson, I'm looking at you.
Exactly. He had the WHO saying the polar opposite, China on the phone reporting just how bad it was, and the Lancet raising the alarm. Any remotely competent government would've sought alternative advice. Emphasis on remotely.He had a duty to seek out opinions widely. His most senior doctors, for instance, were saying things that were dismaying senior doctors and epidemiologists of other countries. His job was to interrogate them and find out why they disagreed with one another. In the end this was a political decision to make. And yes, he is a mediocre person in every conceivable way, totally ill-equipped for any kind of leadership role, as he has demonstrated in every leadership role he has ever held. But 'I'm really shit at this' isn't an excuse when you've schemed to get yourself into the position to do 'this'.
It was an easy answer that fitted with the malthusian/eugenicist/social darwinist thinking implicit to right libertarian politics. The amazing bit is how they expected people to just go with it,.
My point stands. Boris Johnson was a mediocre journalist, turned (fuck knows how exactly) a very successful politican. Not a doctor. He was advised by the most senior doctors in the country. What do you suggest his motive was to adopt the herd immunity policy exactly? That he wanted to kill people?
If we have to name anyone, Vallance (tag-teamed with Cummings, which tells you all you need to know about his character) and Whitty are surely the most culpable. But yes, Ferguson has some severe questions to answer, likewise the entire SAGE team. As shown by Scotland's CMO parroting the same rubbish before she resigned for flouting her own advice two weeks' in a row, these views are (apologies for the phrase) endemic in our medical community.Sure, I get that. I agree, seeing him standing next to the chancellor in those first few briefings was toe-curling. He was totally uninformed and kept deferring to Rishi who seemed to actually know what was going on. He should be nowhere near No. 10. But I think the real culprits here are the 'experts'. Neil Ferguson, I'm looking at you.
More like Ioannis Metaxas.Johnson (has) always dreamed of being thought of and remembered like a great WWII leader. Churchill definitely, Hitler probably, Stalin
probably not. I hope he doesn't end up being remembered like Tito.
I hope he survives.
This could be a political Road To Damascus moment.
If he passes then they can argue the NHS isn't fit for purpose. Ergo, I hope he pulls through and sees the error of his ways and starts paying all "essential workers" a decent wage.
It's not impossible.
yes it isIt's not impossible.
Exactly. He had the WHO saying the polar opposite, China on the phone reporting just how bad it was, and the Lancet raising the alarm. Any remotely competent government would've sought alternative advice. Emphasis on remotely.
The scientific and medical failure has undoubtedly disturbed me the most. I want to know who taught our chief doctors and scientists this, when, and how it went under the radar for so long. But I'd be just as disturbed if it's used as an out for the people who empowered them.