belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Not to mention the ‘countdown’ said paper ran in the run up to Charlotte church and bille pipers’ 16th birthdays.Samantha Fox was just 16 when she started as a 'page 3' girl in The Sun.. Actually a child.
Not to mention the ‘countdown’ said paper ran in the run up to Charlotte church and bille pipers’ 16th birthdays.Samantha Fox was just 16 when she started as a 'page 3' girl in The Sun.. Actually a child.
I can’t find evidence of this happening. Just that Chris Moyles made some creepy remarks.Not to mention the ‘countdown’ said paper ran in the run up to Charlotte church and bille pipers’ 16th birthdays.
I can’t find evidence of this happening. Just that Chris Moyles made some creepy remarks.
The Sun is hardly a stout defender of public morals, it's just that its editorial staff know that scandal sells copy.
As for whether a crime had been committed as it? Regardless of whether or not 17 is an adult it is above the age of sexual consent.
Has a prosecuteable crime been committed if there was no coercion involved?
I suspect whomever it was didn't fork out over 30k out of infatuation.The Sun is hardly a stout defender of public morals, it's just that its editorial staff know that scandal sells copy.
As for whether a crime had been committed as it? Regardless of whether or not 17 is an adult it is above the age of sexual consent.
Has a prosecuteable crime been committed if there was no coercion involved?
These things did happen. They did the same to Emma Watson.I can’t find evidence of this happening. Just that Chris Moyles made some creepy remarks.
Can't see CPS going for that if they met through onlyfansEncouraging under 18's to create and send sexual pics is a crime, child pornography.
I’m not defending News International but I wanted to read more on it and found this article which suggests it didn’t happen:These things did happen. They did the same to Emma Watson.
Some of the Sun's comments about 'models'/victims approaching 16 in the 1980's we're literally as awful as 'and from Thursday you can see her nipples!!' and the poor woman becoming more and more scantily clad as the days passed
Chris Moyles did make some terrible comments about Church and her approaching legality
I'm sure if you Trawl Reddit or Press reader these articles or JPGs oh the pants could be found.
I recall someone saying that the phrase to search for on the Daily Mail website is 'all grown up' to find this kind of article
The Sun is hardly a stout defender of public morals, it's just that its editorial staff know that scandal sells copy.
As for whether a crime had been committed as it? Regardless of whether or not 17 is an adult it is above the age of sexual consent.
Has a prosecuteable crime been committed if there was no coercion involved?
How long as that been the case then?Encouraging under 18's to create and send sexual pics is a crime, child pornography.
I think they would try if it were high profile enough. The case/person, I mean.Can't see CPS going for that if they met through onlyfans
How long as that been the case ?
Not a clock but the the language used in the preceding weeks amounted to the same is my understanding of the situation in relation to Church specifically.I’m not defending News International but I wanted to read more on it and found this article which suggests it didn’t happen:
News International and the Charlotte Church Countdown Clock
Today's media kerfluffle in the UK is over the allegation that News International through its subsidiary and newspaper The Sun, published a "Charlotte Church Countdown Clock". It didn't happen but the allegation that it did is an interesting commentary on how the tabloid press is regarded by...www.forbes.com
Well isn’t/wasn’t it that you could only marry under 18 in England with a parent’s consent which is why young couples would elope to Scotland?In America the age of consent is a state thing, looks like a patchwork quilt of the different legal ages. Wonder how that works in practice, legally etc.
Well isn’t/wasn’t it that you could only marry under 18 in England with a parent’s consent which is why young couples would elope to Scotland?
I’m not defending News International but I wanted to read more on it and found this article which suggests it didn’t happen:
News International and the Charlotte Church Countdown Clock
Today's media kerfluffle in the UK is over the allegation that News International through its subsidiary and newspaper The Sun, published a "Charlotte Church Countdown Clock". It didn't happen but the allegation that it did is an interesting commentary on how the tabloid press is regarded by...www.forbes.com
Only in the junior army. Not allowed to go into combat until 18 or used to be.But old enough to be enlisted in the army.
i just learned that the marriage age in the uk changed just a couple of months ago (from 16 up to 18). How did i miss that. This does make sense to me, as in its more coherent - if you're too young to have an only fans account you're too young to say i do.
Urban75 posters being more restrained than Twitter posters in terms of speculation.
Urban75 posters being more restrained than Twitter posters in terms of speculation.
Much of Twitter seem to be listing any annoying BBC presenters they don't like, to the point Vine and Lineker have stated it's not themUrban75 posters being more restrained than Twitter posters in terms of speculation.
If I was paying 10% of 6figure salary to someone to keep me in work. I'd consider keeping tabs on people putting out career ending liables as part of their job...Urban75 posters being more restrained than Twitter posters in terms of speculation.
We got a friendly warning in post #20Urban75 posters being more restrained than Twitter posters in terms of speculation.
Fairly sure a number of the twitter mob would be delighted if it had been Lineker, after his stance on the government and migrants.Much of Twitter seem to be listing any annoying BBC presenters they don't like, to the point Vine and Lineker have stated it's not them
To be fair, the child/adult distinction in this country is a bit fucked up - you can have a job, pay tax, and live away from 'home' at 16, but not vote until 18 - you can be married at 16 to another 16yo, and have children and a house with them, but if they send you an underwear shot from the dressing room at bravissimo you could be sent to prison for possessing sexual images of a child.
It's hardly conducive to everyone knowing where the boundaries are.