why do you wonder that ? to be honest the package offered by ATOS is no better than the NHS and seems to be rather more confrontational especially if people who are attending for assessment have be hyped up by some of the stuff that is being said by those with political motivations against this ( despite the fact it was NuLabour initiative)
"Have to be"? "political motivations"?
Interesting set of constructions you're attempting to build. Let's deal with them one at a time:
1) No-one "has to be" hyped up, although they often are purely by the
reportage around the WCA. Any interview, examination etc that is premised on establishing facts about you in order to cross-check with facts already submitted (by yourself and by the health professionals providing you with treatment) is going to be confrontational anyway. If you want people to be "Quiet Little Crips", then effectively saying that they're frauds and liars until you've confirmed their "disabled" status
IS confrontational. Don't blame clients for reacting, it makes you look like a shill.
2) Find me anyone on this thread who doesn't acknowledge the sheer cuntery of nu Labour in power, or that they set this ball rolling. Your "point" is a straw man. As for
personal political motivations,
hell yes, I'm politically-motivated! I'm motivated to try to ensure that people, those I know
and those I don't, do not get steam-rollered by the WCA like many of us did by the equally violent and poorly-conceived Benefits Integrity Project.
You, you're coming across as one of those idiots who sees everything in terms of "lefties" and "hippies", because you don't have the imagination to think of anything that is beyond your personal prejudices.