Good, get it up on youtube, it will just be washed away with all the Olympics stuff, and it will be on BBC2...
I fucking knew it i posted as much on the Guardian website earlier. BBC tow the Tory line when it comes to benefits.Disabled or Faking It?
Duration: 30 minutes
Panorama investigates the government's plans to end the so-called 'sick note culture' and their attempts to get millions of people off disability benefits and into work. In Britain's modern welfare state, millions are being paid to private companies to assess sick and disabled claimants but is the system working? Or are new tests wrongly victimising those who deserve support the most?
Actually the Panorama one looks like the usual BBC bifurcation of deserving/undeserving poor, they just can't seem to have a programme about the undoubted brutalities and absurdities of ATOS and welfare reform...
Panorama investigates the government's plans to end the
so-called 'sick note culture' and their attempts to get millions of people off disability benefits and into work. In Britain's modern welfare state, millions are being paid to private companies to assess sick and disabled claimants but is the system working? Or are new tests wrongly victimising those who deserve support the most?
Using undercover filming, reporter Jackie Long investigates the
shocking processes used to assess whether sickness and disability benefit claimants should be declared fit for work.
Please read if you have had an ATOS assessment. Received an email from the Benefits and Work website ( you don't have to be a member to see this ) Professor Harrington who has been doing the review into ATOS wants to hear from anyone who has been through the ATOS assessment as to whether the changes he has recommended are making a difference. It's basically whether we are being dealt with fairly and effectively since the changes were made
It goes on to say that the DWP have made it extremely difficult for anyone to answer the questions and probably working on the assumption that hardly anyone will have the chance to respond, will get a favourable outcome for them. It explains it fully on the site - too much to put here.Benefits and Work have put together a questionnaire themselves and so it's important that all of us who have suffered at the hands of ATOS to fill this in and it will then be forwarded to Prof Harrington. Not much time - it has to be back by the 7th September. It seems that it was deliberate that they only give us a few weeks to do it and that it coincided with the school summer holidays. Pass this on to as many people as you can.
BBC also broadcasts Saints and Scroungers. If you want any more examples Flatpack im sure i can come up with some more. Left wing MY ARSE!
it's got a 20 min limit for the session..Gah! It took me too long to complete, and I'll have to start again!
it's got a 20 min limit for the session..
sorry, i've not checked out the links yet, but http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/employment-and-support-allowance/harrington says there is a downloadable text doc for you to fill in the answers so that you can copy/paste into an email (or i'd guess the online survey) at your leisure..
Could you start the test then set the clock back on your PC an hour or 2 to give you extra time to fill it in?
might be worth asking b&w if they can change it?Its appalling that it has a time limit, many disabled people have cognitive issues or are easily fatigued, this may be discriminatory and be challenged...
We’ve created a text version of the questionnaire, so if you prefer you can type in that and then send your answers to Harrington.
I consider that it is reasonably arguable that the reasonable adjustments
required by the [Equality Act 2010] include the early obtaining of independent
medical evidence where the documents submitted with the claim show that the
claimant suffers from mental health problems and that this has not been done, or
at least not done on a sufficiently widespread basis.
The present system results in many thousands of unnecessary appeals at great
public expense, with a high success rate. What is not counted is the cost in
human misery for those people who should never have had to go through the
appeals process in the first place. This could be avoided if doctors were involved
in the assessments at the outset. The Government’s policy of by-passing doctors
is inefficient, unfair, and inhumane. We gain heart from the court’s finding that as
a matter of law, it is arguable that something has to change.
Not sure if folks have seen this but permission has been granted fro the MHRN to take the Govt/WCA to court.
http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/
Apologies if this isn't the right place to put it.
There's no wrong place, the more that's done to expose these wankers for the idiots they are, the betterNot sure if folks have seen this but permission has been granted fro the MHRN to take the Govt/WCA to court.
http://blacktrianglecampaign.org/
Apologies if this isn't the right place to put it.